OMERACT filter 2.1: Elaboration of the conceptual framework for outcome measurement in health intervention studies

Maarten Boers, Dorcas E. Beaton, Beverley J. Shea, Lara J. Maxwell, Susan J. Bartlett, Clifton Bingham, Philip G. Conaghan, Maria Antonietta D’Agostino, Maarten P. De Wit, Laure Gossec, Lyn March, Lee S. Simon, Jasvinder A. Singh, Vibeke Strand, George A. Wells, Peter Tugwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.0 framework was developed in 2014 to aid core outcome set development by describing the full universe of “measurable aspects of health conditions” from which core domains can be selected. This paper provides elaborations and updated concepts (OMERACT Filter 2.1). Methods. At OMERACT 2018, we discussed challenges in the framework application caused by unclear or ambiguous wording and terms and incompletely developed concepts. Results. The updated OMERACT Filter 2.1 framework makes benefits and harms explicit, clarifies concepts, and improves naming of various terms. Conclusion. We expect that the Filter 2.1 framework will improve the process of core set development.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1021-1027
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Rheumatology
Volume46
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2019

Fingerprint

Rheumatology
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Health

Keywords

  • Health status indicator
  • Measurement model
  • OMERACT
  • Patient outcome
  • Theoretical framework

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rheumatology
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology

Cite this

OMERACT filter 2.1 : Elaboration of the conceptual framework for outcome measurement in health intervention studies. / Boers, Maarten; Beaton, Dorcas E.; Shea, Beverley J.; Maxwell, Lara J.; Bartlett, Susan J.; Bingham, Clifton; Conaghan, Philip G.; D’Agostino, Maria Antonietta; De Wit, Maarten P.; Gossec, Laure; March, Lyn; Simon, Lee S.; Singh, Jasvinder A.; Strand, Vibeke; Wells, George A.; Tugwell, Peter.

In: Journal of Rheumatology, Vol. 46, No. 8, 01.08.2019, p. 1021-1027.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Boers, M, Beaton, DE, Shea, BJ, Maxwell, LJ, Bartlett, SJ, Bingham, C, Conaghan, PG, D’Agostino, MA, De Wit, MP, Gossec, L, March, L, Simon, LS, Singh, JA, Strand, V, Wells, GA & Tugwell, P 2019, 'OMERACT filter 2.1: Elaboration of the conceptual framework for outcome measurement in health intervention studies', Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1021-1027. https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.181096
Boers, Maarten ; Beaton, Dorcas E. ; Shea, Beverley J. ; Maxwell, Lara J. ; Bartlett, Susan J. ; Bingham, Clifton ; Conaghan, Philip G. ; D’Agostino, Maria Antonietta ; De Wit, Maarten P. ; Gossec, Laure ; March, Lyn ; Simon, Lee S. ; Singh, Jasvinder A. ; Strand, Vibeke ; Wells, George A. ; Tugwell, Peter. / OMERACT filter 2.1 : Elaboration of the conceptual framework for outcome measurement in health intervention studies. In: Journal of Rheumatology. 2019 ; Vol. 46, No. 8. pp. 1021-1027.
@article{61d9b18c2ce5482e9658dc294a87c4b0,
title = "OMERACT filter 2.1: Elaboration of the conceptual framework for outcome measurement in health intervention studies",
abstract = "Objective. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.0 framework was developed in 2014 to aid core outcome set development by describing the full universe of “measurable aspects of health conditions” from which core domains can be selected. This paper provides elaborations and updated concepts (OMERACT Filter 2.1). Methods. At OMERACT 2018, we discussed challenges in the framework application caused by unclear or ambiguous wording and terms and incompletely developed concepts. Results. The updated OMERACT Filter 2.1 framework makes benefits and harms explicit, clarifies concepts, and improves naming of various terms. Conclusion. We expect that the Filter 2.1 framework will improve the process of core set development.",
keywords = "Health status indicator, Measurement model, OMERACT, Patient outcome, Theoretical framework",
author = "Maarten Boers and Beaton, {Dorcas E.} and Shea, {Beverley J.} and Maxwell, {Lara J.} and Bartlett, {Susan J.} and Clifton Bingham and Conaghan, {Philip G.} and D’Agostino, {Maria Antonietta} and {De Wit}, {Maarten P.} and Laure Gossec and Lyn March and Simon, {Lee S.} and Singh, {Jasvinder A.} and Vibeke Strand and Wells, {George A.} and Peter Tugwell",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3899/jrheum.181096",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "1021--1027",
journal = "Journal of Rheumatology",
issn = "0315-162X",
publisher = "Journal of Rheumatology",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - OMERACT filter 2.1

T2 - Elaboration of the conceptual framework for outcome measurement in health intervention studies

AU - Boers, Maarten

AU - Beaton, Dorcas E.

AU - Shea, Beverley J.

AU - Maxwell, Lara J.

AU - Bartlett, Susan J.

AU - Bingham, Clifton

AU - Conaghan, Philip G.

AU - D’Agostino, Maria Antonietta

AU - De Wit, Maarten P.

AU - Gossec, Laure

AU - March, Lyn

AU - Simon, Lee S.

AU - Singh, Jasvinder A.

AU - Strand, Vibeke

AU - Wells, George A.

AU - Tugwell, Peter

PY - 2019/8/1

Y1 - 2019/8/1

N2 - Objective. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.0 framework was developed in 2014 to aid core outcome set development by describing the full universe of “measurable aspects of health conditions” from which core domains can be selected. This paper provides elaborations and updated concepts (OMERACT Filter 2.1). Methods. At OMERACT 2018, we discussed challenges in the framework application caused by unclear or ambiguous wording and terms and incompletely developed concepts. Results. The updated OMERACT Filter 2.1 framework makes benefits and harms explicit, clarifies concepts, and improves naming of various terms. Conclusion. We expect that the Filter 2.1 framework will improve the process of core set development.

AB - Objective. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter 2.0 framework was developed in 2014 to aid core outcome set development by describing the full universe of “measurable aspects of health conditions” from which core domains can be selected. This paper provides elaborations and updated concepts (OMERACT Filter 2.1). Methods. At OMERACT 2018, we discussed challenges in the framework application caused by unclear or ambiguous wording and terms and incompletely developed concepts. Results. The updated OMERACT Filter 2.1 framework makes benefits and harms explicit, clarifies concepts, and improves naming of various terms. Conclusion. We expect that the Filter 2.1 framework will improve the process of core set development.

KW - Health status indicator

KW - Measurement model

KW - OMERACT

KW - Patient outcome

KW - Theoretical framework

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070203338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070203338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3899/jrheum.181096

DO - 10.3899/jrheum.181096

M3 - Article

C2 - 30770515

AN - SCOPUS:85070203338

VL - 46

SP - 1021

EP - 1027

JO - Journal of Rheumatology

JF - Journal of Rheumatology

SN - 0315-162X

IS - 8

ER -