Ocular nanoparticle toxicity and transfection of the retina and retinal pigment epithelium

Tarl W. Prow, Imran Bhutto, Sahng Y. Kim, Rhonda Grebe, Carol Merges, D. Scott McLeod, Koichi Uno, Mohamed Mennon, Li Rodriguez, Kam Leong, Gerard Anthony Lutty

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Chitosan, PCEP (poly{[(cholesteryl oxocarbonylamido ethyl) methyl bis(ethylene) ammonium iodide] ethyl phosphate}), and magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) were evaluated for the safe delivery of genes in the eye. Rabbits were injected with nanoparticles either intravitreally (IV) or subretinally (SR) and sacrificed 7 days later. Eyes were grossly evaluated for retinal pigment epithelium abnormalities, retinal degeneration, and inflammation. All eyes were cryopreserved and sectioned for analysis of toxicity and expression of either enhanced green or red fluorescent proteins. All of the nanoparticles were able to transfect cells in vitro and in vivo. IV chitosan showed inflammation in 12/13 eyes, whereas IV PCEP and IV MNPs were not inflammatory and did not induce retinal pathology. SR PCEP was nontoxic in the majority of cases but yielded poor transfection, whereas SR MNPs were nontoxic and yielded good transfection. Therefore, we conclude that the best nanoparticle evaluated in vivo was the least toxic nanoparticle tested, the MNP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)340-349
Number of pages10
JournalNanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine
Volume4
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Retinal Pigments
Retinal Pigment Epithelium
Pigments
Nanoparticles
Transfection
Toxicity
Retina
Chitosan
Ammonium iodide
Inflammation
Retinal Degeneration
Poisons
Pathology
Propylene
Phosphates
Genes
Rabbits
Proteins

Keywords

  • Chitosan
  • Gene delivery
  • Magnetic nanoparticle
  • Retina
  • Toxicity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Medicine
  • Bioengineering
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Pharmaceutical Science

Cite this

Ocular nanoparticle toxicity and transfection of the retina and retinal pigment epithelium. / Prow, Tarl W.; Bhutto, Imran; Kim, Sahng Y.; Grebe, Rhonda; Merges, Carol; McLeod, D. Scott; Uno, Koichi; Mennon, Mohamed; Rodriguez, Li; Leong, Kam; Lutty, Gerard Anthony.

In: Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine, Vol. 4, No. 4, 12.2008, p. 340-349.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Prow, Tarl W. ; Bhutto, Imran ; Kim, Sahng Y. ; Grebe, Rhonda ; Merges, Carol ; McLeod, D. Scott ; Uno, Koichi ; Mennon, Mohamed ; Rodriguez, Li ; Leong, Kam ; Lutty, Gerard Anthony. / Ocular nanoparticle toxicity and transfection of the retina and retinal pigment epithelium. In: Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine. 2008 ; Vol. 4, No. 4. pp. 340-349.
@article{d16dd229542e44c1b8a8af4217915dca,
title = "Ocular nanoparticle toxicity and transfection of the retina and retinal pigment epithelium",
abstract = "Chitosan, PCEP (poly{[(cholesteryl oxocarbonylamido ethyl) methyl bis(ethylene) ammonium iodide] ethyl phosphate}), and magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) were evaluated for the safe delivery of genes in the eye. Rabbits were injected with nanoparticles either intravitreally (IV) or subretinally (SR) and sacrificed 7 days later. Eyes were grossly evaluated for retinal pigment epithelium abnormalities, retinal degeneration, and inflammation. All eyes were cryopreserved and sectioned for analysis of toxicity and expression of either enhanced green or red fluorescent proteins. All of the nanoparticles were able to transfect cells in vitro and in vivo. IV chitosan showed inflammation in 12/13 eyes, whereas IV PCEP and IV MNPs were not inflammatory and did not induce retinal pathology. SR PCEP was nontoxic in the majority of cases but yielded poor transfection, whereas SR MNPs were nontoxic and yielded good transfection. Therefore, we conclude that the best nanoparticle evaluated in vivo was the least toxic nanoparticle tested, the MNP.",
keywords = "Chitosan, Gene delivery, Magnetic nanoparticle, Retina, Toxicity",
author = "Prow, {Tarl W.} and Imran Bhutto and Kim, {Sahng Y.} and Rhonda Grebe and Carol Merges and McLeod, {D. Scott} and Koichi Uno and Mohamed Mennon and Li Rodriguez and Kam Leong and Lutty, {Gerard Anthony}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.nano.2008.06.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "340--349",
journal = "Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine",
issn = "1549-9634",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ocular nanoparticle toxicity and transfection of the retina and retinal pigment epithelium

AU - Prow, Tarl W.

AU - Bhutto, Imran

AU - Kim, Sahng Y.

AU - Grebe, Rhonda

AU - Merges, Carol

AU - McLeod, D. Scott

AU - Uno, Koichi

AU - Mennon, Mohamed

AU - Rodriguez, Li

AU - Leong, Kam

AU - Lutty, Gerard Anthony

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Chitosan, PCEP (poly{[(cholesteryl oxocarbonylamido ethyl) methyl bis(ethylene) ammonium iodide] ethyl phosphate}), and magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) were evaluated for the safe delivery of genes in the eye. Rabbits were injected with nanoparticles either intravitreally (IV) or subretinally (SR) and sacrificed 7 days later. Eyes were grossly evaluated for retinal pigment epithelium abnormalities, retinal degeneration, and inflammation. All eyes were cryopreserved and sectioned for analysis of toxicity and expression of either enhanced green or red fluorescent proteins. All of the nanoparticles were able to transfect cells in vitro and in vivo. IV chitosan showed inflammation in 12/13 eyes, whereas IV PCEP and IV MNPs were not inflammatory and did not induce retinal pathology. SR PCEP was nontoxic in the majority of cases but yielded poor transfection, whereas SR MNPs were nontoxic and yielded good transfection. Therefore, we conclude that the best nanoparticle evaluated in vivo was the least toxic nanoparticle tested, the MNP.

AB - Chitosan, PCEP (poly{[(cholesteryl oxocarbonylamido ethyl) methyl bis(ethylene) ammonium iodide] ethyl phosphate}), and magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) were evaluated for the safe delivery of genes in the eye. Rabbits were injected with nanoparticles either intravitreally (IV) or subretinally (SR) and sacrificed 7 days later. Eyes were grossly evaluated for retinal pigment epithelium abnormalities, retinal degeneration, and inflammation. All eyes were cryopreserved and sectioned for analysis of toxicity and expression of either enhanced green or red fluorescent proteins. All of the nanoparticles were able to transfect cells in vitro and in vivo. IV chitosan showed inflammation in 12/13 eyes, whereas IV PCEP and IV MNPs were not inflammatory and did not induce retinal pathology. SR PCEP was nontoxic in the majority of cases but yielded poor transfection, whereas SR MNPs were nontoxic and yielded good transfection. Therefore, we conclude that the best nanoparticle evaluated in vivo was the least toxic nanoparticle tested, the MNP.

KW - Chitosan

KW - Gene delivery

KW - Magnetic nanoparticle

KW - Retina

KW - Toxicity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=55949127631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=55949127631&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.nano.2008.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.nano.2008.06.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 18640079

AN - SCOPUS:55949127631

VL - 4

SP - 340

EP - 349

JO - Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine

JF - Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine

SN - 1549-9634

IS - 4

ER -