Occasion Setting: A Neural Network Approach

Nestor A. Schmajuk, Jeffrey A. Lamoureux, Peter C. Holland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Classical conditioning data show that a conditioned stimulus (CS) can act either as a simple CS -eliciting conditioned responses (CRs) by signaling the occurrence of an unconditioned stimulus (US) - or as an occasion setter - controlling the responses generated by another CS. In this article, the authors apply a simple extension of a network model of conditioning, originally presented by N. A. Schmajuk and J. J. DiCarlo (S-D; 1992), to the description of these 2 different CS functions. In the model, CS inputs are connected to the CR output both directly and indirectly through a hidden-unit layer that codes configurai stimuli. In this framework, a CS acts as (a) a simple stimulus through its direct connections with the output units and as (b) an occasion setter through its indirect configural connections via the hidden units. Computer simulations demonstrate that the network accounts for a large part of the data on occasion setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-32
Number of pages30
JournalPsychological Review
Volume105
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1998

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Occasion Setting: A Neural Network Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Schmajuk, N. A., Lamoureux, J. A., & Holland, P. C. (1998). Occasion Setting: A Neural Network Approach. Psychological Review, 105(1), 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.3