Obstetrician and gynecologists population-based screening practices

Angie Jelin, Britta Anderson, Louise Wilkins-Haug, Jay Schulkin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The ability to obtain genetic information can now be accomplished in far greater detail, and more quickly than in the past. It is important to understand obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) screening practices as these changes occur.Methods: Cross-sectional survey was performed by mailing paper surveys to Fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and a subset of Fellows who belong to the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network (CARN).Results: Response rates were 57% for the CARN network. Almost all responders (92%) offer population-based genetic screening in the prenatal period and almost all (93%) conduct counseling prior to the provision of genetic testing. Almost all (92%) counsel patients when the result is positive, with 46% being the primary counselor and 55% calling the patient themselves. When results are negative, 73% counsel with 58% indicating they are the primary counselor and 17% call patients themselves. A total of 72% have received continuing medical education (CME) on genetics within 5 years, with 79% receiving CME at conferences and 21% receiving CME online.Conclusion: Ob-gyns have a large role in providing patients new genetic screening technologies. This role requires a significant knowledge base, some of which can be obtained by online modules; however, our study suggests online education is underutilized as a means for CME on genetic screening among ob-gyns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)875-879
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 18 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Continuing Medical Education
Genetic Testing
Population
Aptitude
Knowledge Bases
Population Genetics
Research
Counseling
Cross-Sectional Studies
Technology
Education
Counselors

Keywords

  • CME
  • Cystic fibrosis
  • Genetics
  • Prenatal
  • Screening
  • survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Obstetrician and gynecologists population-based screening practices. / Jelin, Angie; Anderson, Britta; Wilkins-Haug, Louise; Schulkin, Jay.

In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 6, 18.03.2016, p. 875-879.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jelin, Angie ; Anderson, Britta ; Wilkins-Haug, Louise ; Schulkin, Jay. / Obstetrician and gynecologists population-based screening practices. In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2016 ; Vol. 29, No. 6. pp. 875-879.
@article{687c279c893a4f84982efdf5eda5a24d,
title = "Obstetrician and gynecologists population-based screening practices",
abstract = "Background: The ability to obtain genetic information can now be accomplished in far greater detail, and more quickly than in the past. It is important to understand obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) screening practices as these changes occur.Methods: Cross-sectional survey was performed by mailing paper surveys to Fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and a subset of Fellows who belong to the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network (CARN).Results: Response rates were 57{\%} for the CARN network. Almost all responders (92{\%}) offer population-based genetic screening in the prenatal period and almost all (93{\%}) conduct counseling prior to the provision of genetic testing. Almost all (92{\%}) counsel patients when the result is positive, with 46{\%} being the primary counselor and 55{\%} calling the patient themselves. When results are negative, 73{\%} counsel with 58{\%} indicating they are the primary counselor and 17{\%} call patients themselves. A total of 72{\%} have received continuing medical education (CME) on genetics within 5 years, with 79{\%} receiving CME at conferences and 21{\%} receiving CME online.Conclusion: Ob-gyns have a large role in providing patients new genetic screening technologies. This role requires a significant knowledge base, some of which can be obtained by online modules; however, our study suggests online education is underutilized as a means for CME on genetic screening among ob-gyns.",
keywords = "CME, Cystic fibrosis, Genetics, Prenatal, Screening, survey",
author = "Angie Jelin and Britta Anderson and Louise Wilkins-Haug and Jay Schulkin",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "18",
doi = "10.3109/14767058.2015.1029910",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "875--879",
journal = "Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine",
issn = "1476-7058",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Obstetrician and gynecologists population-based screening practices

AU - Jelin, Angie

AU - Anderson, Britta

AU - Wilkins-Haug, Louise

AU - Schulkin, Jay

PY - 2016/3/18

Y1 - 2016/3/18

N2 - Background: The ability to obtain genetic information can now be accomplished in far greater detail, and more quickly than in the past. It is important to understand obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) screening practices as these changes occur.Methods: Cross-sectional survey was performed by mailing paper surveys to Fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and a subset of Fellows who belong to the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network (CARN).Results: Response rates were 57% for the CARN network. Almost all responders (92%) offer population-based genetic screening in the prenatal period and almost all (93%) conduct counseling prior to the provision of genetic testing. Almost all (92%) counsel patients when the result is positive, with 46% being the primary counselor and 55% calling the patient themselves. When results are negative, 73% counsel with 58% indicating they are the primary counselor and 17% call patients themselves. A total of 72% have received continuing medical education (CME) on genetics within 5 years, with 79% receiving CME at conferences and 21% receiving CME online.Conclusion: Ob-gyns have a large role in providing patients new genetic screening technologies. This role requires a significant knowledge base, some of which can be obtained by online modules; however, our study suggests online education is underutilized as a means for CME on genetic screening among ob-gyns.

AB - Background: The ability to obtain genetic information can now be accomplished in far greater detail, and more quickly than in the past. It is important to understand obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) screening practices as these changes occur.Methods: Cross-sectional survey was performed by mailing paper surveys to Fellows of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and a subset of Fellows who belong to the Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network (CARN).Results: Response rates were 57% for the CARN network. Almost all responders (92%) offer population-based genetic screening in the prenatal period and almost all (93%) conduct counseling prior to the provision of genetic testing. Almost all (92%) counsel patients when the result is positive, with 46% being the primary counselor and 55% calling the patient themselves. When results are negative, 73% counsel with 58% indicating they are the primary counselor and 17% call patients themselves. A total of 72% have received continuing medical education (CME) on genetics within 5 years, with 79% receiving CME at conferences and 21% receiving CME online.Conclusion: Ob-gyns have a large role in providing patients new genetic screening technologies. This role requires a significant knowledge base, some of which can be obtained by online modules; however, our study suggests online education is underutilized as a means for CME on genetic screening among ob-gyns.

KW - CME

KW - Cystic fibrosis

KW - Genetics

KW - Prenatal

KW - Screening

KW - survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84983208352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84983208352&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/14767058.2015.1029910

DO - 10.3109/14767058.2015.1029910

M3 - Article

C2 - 25782463

AN - SCOPUS:84983208352

VL - 29

SP - 875

EP - 879

JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

SN - 1476-7058

IS - 6

ER -