Observational Studies in Economic Evaluation

Daniel E. Polsky, M. Baiocchi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The goal of an economic evaluation of medical interventions is to provide actionable information for policy makers. However, the demand for causal evidence in medicine far exceeds the ability to practically control, finance, and/or conduct randomized studies. Observational data offer a sensible alternative source of data for developing evidence about the implications of different medical interventions. However, for studies using observational data to be considered as reliable sources for evidence of causal effects, great care is needed to design studies in a way that limits the number of alternative explanations for observed differences in outcomes between intervention and control. In this article we highlight a number of the techniques and tools used in high-quality observational studies. We will also discuss a few of the common pitfalls to be aware of.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationEncyclopedia of Health Economics
PublisherElsevier
Pages399-408
Number of pages10
ISBN (Electronic)9780123756787
ISBN (Print)9780123756794
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Economic evaluation
Observational study
Causal effect
Medicine
Politicians
Finance

Keywords

  • Average treatment effect
  • Average treatment effect on the treated
  • Hidden bias
  • Individual level treatment effect
  • Instrumental variables
  • Matching
  • Neonatal intensive care unit
  • Observed selection bias
  • Potential outcome framework
  • Probability weighting
  • Propensity score
  • Regression discontinuity
  • Selection bias
  • Sensitivity analysis
  • Strongly ignorable treatment assignment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Polsky, D. E., & Baiocchi, M. (2014). Observational Studies in Economic Evaluation. In Encyclopedia of Health Economics (pp. 399-408). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375678-7.01417-6

Observational Studies in Economic Evaluation. / Polsky, Daniel E.; Baiocchi, M.

Encyclopedia of Health Economics. Elsevier, 2014. p. 399-408.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Polsky, DE & Baiocchi, M 2014, Observational Studies in Economic Evaluation. in Encyclopedia of Health Economics. Elsevier, pp. 399-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375678-7.01417-6
Polsky DE, Baiocchi M. Observational Studies in Economic Evaluation. In Encyclopedia of Health Economics. Elsevier. 2014. p. 399-408 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375678-7.01417-6
Polsky, Daniel E. ; Baiocchi, M. / Observational Studies in Economic Evaluation. Encyclopedia of Health Economics. Elsevier, 2014. pp. 399-408
@inbook{c47d95a829594b2b81f387ad6e3b24e7,
title = "Observational Studies in Economic Evaluation",
abstract = "The goal of an economic evaluation of medical interventions is to provide actionable information for policy makers. However, the demand for causal evidence in medicine far exceeds the ability to practically control, finance, and/or conduct randomized studies. Observational data offer a sensible alternative source of data for developing evidence about the implications of different medical interventions. However, for studies using observational data to be considered as reliable sources for evidence of causal effects, great care is needed to design studies in a way that limits the number of alternative explanations for observed differences in outcomes between intervention and control. In this article we highlight a number of the techniques and tools used in high-quality observational studies. We will also discuss a few of the common pitfalls to be aware of.",
keywords = "Average treatment effect, Average treatment effect on the treated, Hidden bias, Individual level treatment effect, Instrumental variables, Matching, Neonatal intensive care unit, Observed selection bias, Potential outcome framework, Probability weighting, Propensity score, Regression discontinuity, Selection bias, Sensitivity analysis, Strongly ignorable treatment assignment",
author = "Polsky, {Daniel E.} and M. Baiocchi",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/B978-0-12-375678-7.01417-6",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780123756794",
pages = "399--408",
booktitle = "Encyclopedia of Health Economics",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Observational Studies in Economic Evaluation

AU - Polsky, Daniel E.

AU - Baiocchi, M.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - The goal of an economic evaluation of medical interventions is to provide actionable information for policy makers. However, the demand for causal evidence in medicine far exceeds the ability to practically control, finance, and/or conduct randomized studies. Observational data offer a sensible alternative source of data for developing evidence about the implications of different medical interventions. However, for studies using observational data to be considered as reliable sources for evidence of causal effects, great care is needed to design studies in a way that limits the number of alternative explanations for observed differences in outcomes between intervention and control. In this article we highlight a number of the techniques and tools used in high-quality observational studies. We will also discuss a few of the common pitfalls to be aware of.

AB - The goal of an economic evaluation of medical interventions is to provide actionable information for policy makers. However, the demand for causal evidence in medicine far exceeds the ability to practically control, finance, and/or conduct randomized studies. Observational data offer a sensible alternative source of data for developing evidence about the implications of different medical interventions. However, for studies using observational data to be considered as reliable sources for evidence of causal effects, great care is needed to design studies in a way that limits the number of alternative explanations for observed differences in outcomes between intervention and control. In this article we highlight a number of the techniques and tools used in high-quality observational studies. We will also discuss a few of the common pitfalls to be aware of.

KW - Average treatment effect

KW - Average treatment effect on the treated

KW - Hidden bias

KW - Individual level treatment effect

KW - Instrumental variables

KW - Matching

KW - Neonatal intensive care unit

KW - Observed selection bias

KW - Potential outcome framework

KW - Probability weighting

KW - Propensity score

KW - Regression discontinuity

KW - Selection bias

KW - Sensitivity analysis

KW - Strongly ignorable treatment assignment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043293792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043293792&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/B978-0-12-375678-7.01417-6

DO - 10.1016/B978-0-12-375678-7.01417-6

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85043293792

SN - 9780123756794

SP - 399

EP - 408

BT - Encyclopedia of Health Economics

PB - Elsevier

ER -