Objective measures of sleep and wakefulness in patients with moderate to severe brain injury on an inpatient rehabilitation unit. Pearls and pitfalls of actigraph monitoring

Michael J. Makley, Kimberley R. Monden, Angela Philippus, Patrick Tarwater, Jody Newman, Jennifer Biggs, Eric Spier, Alan Weintraub

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: As awareness of disrupted sleep in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) increases so does interest in finding objective measures of sleep. As a result, many clinicians are turning to actigraphs to monitor sleep in patients with altered consciousness. Actigraphs are accelerometers which have been used in sleep research for over four decades. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to determine the best method for scoring actigraphs in a TBI population and to describe the benefits and pitfalls of using actigraphs with patients on a brain injury rehabilitation unit. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 43 patients compared three different ways of scoring night time rest periods: autoscoring, manual scoring, and set interval scoring for the sleep parameters of sleep efficiency, wakefulness after sleep onset, and total sleep time. Nursing compliance with using the event marker on the device to set rest period was also analyzed. Results: The autoscoring method of determining the rest interval showed an inflation of sleep efficiency. For each sleep parameter compared, the strongest correlations were observed between the manual and set interval scoring methods. Compliance using event markers to set rest interval was low (16.7%). Conclusions: Set interval scoring is the most efficient method to determine the rest interval in TBI patients. The use of event markers was an unreliable method to determine rest period.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)277-285
Number of pages9
JournalNeuroRehabilitation
Volume43
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Wakefulness
Brain Injuries
Inpatients
Sleep
Rehabilitation
Research Design
Economic Inflation
Consciousness
Compliance
Nursing
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • actigraph
  • actigraph scoring
  • Brain injury
  • rehabilitation
  • sleep disruption
  • sleep efficiency
  • sleep rest interval
  • total sleep time
  • traumatic brain injury
  • wakefulness after sleep onset

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Rehabilitation
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Objective measures of sleep and wakefulness in patients with moderate to severe brain injury on an inpatient rehabilitation unit. Pearls and pitfalls of actigraph monitoring. / Makley, Michael J.; Monden, Kimberley R.; Philippus, Angela; Tarwater, Patrick; Newman, Jody; Biggs, Jennifer; Spier, Eric; Weintraub, Alan.

In: NeuroRehabilitation, Vol. 43, No. 3, 01.01.2018, p. 277-285.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Makley, Michael J. ; Monden, Kimberley R. ; Philippus, Angela ; Tarwater, Patrick ; Newman, Jody ; Biggs, Jennifer ; Spier, Eric ; Weintraub, Alan. / Objective measures of sleep and wakefulness in patients with moderate to severe brain injury on an inpatient rehabilitation unit. Pearls and pitfalls of actigraph monitoring. In: NeuroRehabilitation. 2018 ; Vol. 43, No. 3. pp. 277-285.
@article{189368c1cdba4dc7aaa98c16e6d247ad,
title = "Objective measures of sleep and wakefulness in patients with moderate to severe brain injury on an inpatient rehabilitation unit. Pearls and pitfalls of actigraph monitoring",
abstract = "Background: As awareness of disrupted sleep in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) increases so does interest in finding objective measures of sleep. As a result, many clinicians are turning to actigraphs to monitor sleep in patients with altered consciousness. Actigraphs are accelerometers which have been used in sleep research for over four decades. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to determine the best method for scoring actigraphs in a TBI population and to describe the benefits and pitfalls of using actigraphs with patients on a brain injury rehabilitation unit. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 43 patients compared three different ways of scoring night time rest periods: autoscoring, manual scoring, and set interval scoring for the sleep parameters of sleep efficiency, wakefulness after sleep onset, and total sleep time. Nursing compliance with using the event marker on the device to set rest period was also analyzed. Results: The autoscoring method of determining the rest interval showed an inflation of sleep efficiency. For each sleep parameter compared, the strongest correlations were observed between the manual and set interval scoring methods. Compliance using event markers to set rest interval was low (16.7{\%}). Conclusions: Set interval scoring is the most efficient method to determine the rest interval in TBI patients. The use of event markers was an unreliable method to determine rest period.",
keywords = "actigraph, actigraph scoring, Brain injury, rehabilitation, sleep disruption, sleep efficiency, sleep rest interval, total sleep time, traumatic brain injury, wakefulness after sleep onset",
author = "Makley, {Michael J.} and Monden, {Kimberley R.} and Angela Philippus and Patrick Tarwater and Jody Newman and Jennifer Biggs and Eric Spier and Alan Weintraub",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3233/NRE-182537",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "277--285",
journal = "NeuroRehabilitation",
issn = "1053-8135",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Objective measures of sleep and wakefulness in patients with moderate to severe brain injury on an inpatient rehabilitation unit. Pearls and pitfalls of actigraph monitoring

AU - Makley, Michael J.

AU - Monden, Kimberley R.

AU - Philippus, Angela

AU - Tarwater, Patrick

AU - Newman, Jody

AU - Biggs, Jennifer

AU - Spier, Eric

AU - Weintraub, Alan

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: As awareness of disrupted sleep in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) increases so does interest in finding objective measures of sleep. As a result, many clinicians are turning to actigraphs to monitor sleep in patients with altered consciousness. Actigraphs are accelerometers which have been used in sleep research for over four decades. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to determine the best method for scoring actigraphs in a TBI population and to describe the benefits and pitfalls of using actigraphs with patients on a brain injury rehabilitation unit. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 43 patients compared three different ways of scoring night time rest periods: autoscoring, manual scoring, and set interval scoring for the sleep parameters of sleep efficiency, wakefulness after sleep onset, and total sleep time. Nursing compliance with using the event marker on the device to set rest period was also analyzed. Results: The autoscoring method of determining the rest interval showed an inflation of sleep efficiency. For each sleep parameter compared, the strongest correlations were observed between the manual and set interval scoring methods. Compliance using event markers to set rest interval was low (16.7%). Conclusions: Set interval scoring is the most efficient method to determine the rest interval in TBI patients. The use of event markers was an unreliable method to determine rest period.

AB - Background: As awareness of disrupted sleep in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) increases so does interest in finding objective measures of sleep. As a result, many clinicians are turning to actigraphs to monitor sleep in patients with altered consciousness. Actigraphs are accelerometers which have been used in sleep research for over four decades. Objective: The purpose of the present study was to determine the best method for scoring actigraphs in a TBI population and to describe the benefits and pitfalls of using actigraphs with patients on a brain injury rehabilitation unit. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 43 patients compared three different ways of scoring night time rest periods: autoscoring, manual scoring, and set interval scoring for the sleep parameters of sleep efficiency, wakefulness after sleep onset, and total sleep time. Nursing compliance with using the event marker on the device to set rest period was also analyzed. Results: The autoscoring method of determining the rest interval showed an inflation of sleep efficiency. For each sleep parameter compared, the strongest correlations were observed between the manual and set interval scoring methods. Compliance using event markers to set rest interval was low (16.7%). Conclusions: Set interval scoring is the most efficient method to determine the rest interval in TBI patients. The use of event markers was an unreliable method to determine rest period.

KW - actigraph

KW - actigraph scoring

KW - Brain injury

KW - rehabilitation

KW - sleep disruption

KW - sleep efficiency

KW - sleep rest interval

KW - total sleep time

KW - traumatic brain injury

KW - wakefulness after sleep onset

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056392728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056392728&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/NRE-182537

DO - 10.3233/NRE-182537

M3 - Article

C2 - 30373965

AN - SCOPUS:85056392728

VL - 43

SP - 277

EP - 285

JO - NeuroRehabilitation

JF - NeuroRehabilitation

SN - 1053-8135

IS - 3

ER -