Objective assessment of colonoscope manipulation skills in colonoscopy training

Matthew S. Holden, Chang Nancy Wang, Kyle MacNeil, Ben Church, Lawrence Hookey, Gabor Fichtinger, Tamas Ungi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: Manipulation of the colonoscope is a technical challenge for novice clinicians which is best learned in a simulated environment. It involves the coordination of scope tip steering with scope insertion, using a rotated image as reference. The purpose of this work is to develop and validate a system which objectively assesses colonoscopy technical skills proficiency in an arbitrary training environment, allowing novices to assess their technical proficiency prior to real patient encounters. Methods: We implemented a motion tracking setup to objectively analyze and assess the way operators perform colonoscopies, including an analysis of wrist and elbow joint motions. Subsequently, we conducted a validation study to verify whether our motion analysis could discriminate novice colonoscopists from experts. Participants navigated a wooden bench-top model using a standard colonoscope while their motions were tracked. Results: The developed motion tracking setup allowed colonoscopists of varying levels of proficiency to have their colonoscope manipulation assessed, and was able to be operated by a trained non-technical operator. Novice operators had significantly greater median times (101.5 vs. 31.5 s) and number of hand movements (62.0 vs. 21.5) than experts. Experts, however, spent a significantly greater proportion of time in extreme ranges of wrist and elbow joint motion than novices. Conclusion: We have developed and implemented a hand and joint motion analysis system that is able to discriminate novices from experts based on objective measures of motion. These metrics could, thus, serve as proxies for technical proficiency during training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Oct 30 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Colonoscopes
Colonoscopy
Wrist Joint
Elbow Joint
Hand Joints
Motion analysis
Validation Studies
Proxy
Hand

Keywords

  • Colonoscopy
  • Medical education
  • Objective skill assessment
  • Simulation-based training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Holden, M. S., Wang, C. N., MacNeil, K., Church, B., Hookey, L., Fichtinger, G., & Ungi, T. (Accepted/In press). Objective assessment of colonoscope manipulation skills in colonoscopy training. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1676-4

Objective assessment of colonoscope manipulation skills in colonoscopy training. / Holden, Matthew S.; Wang, Chang Nancy; MacNeil, Kyle; Church, Ben; Hookey, Lawrence; Fichtinger, Gabor; Ungi, Tamas.

In: International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 30.10.2017, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Holden, Matthew S. ; Wang, Chang Nancy ; MacNeil, Kyle ; Church, Ben ; Hookey, Lawrence ; Fichtinger, Gabor ; Ungi, Tamas. / Objective assessment of colonoscope manipulation skills in colonoscopy training. In: International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery. 2017 ; pp. 1-10.
@article{4110b1bbffdf4bcc8de85e7de341d1ba,
title = "Objective assessment of colonoscope manipulation skills in colonoscopy training",
abstract = "Objective: Manipulation of the colonoscope is a technical challenge for novice clinicians which is best learned in a simulated environment. It involves the coordination of scope tip steering with scope insertion, using a rotated image as reference. The purpose of this work is to develop and validate a system which objectively assesses colonoscopy technical skills proficiency in an arbitrary training environment, allowing novices to assess their technical proficiency prior to real patient encounters. Methods: We implemented a motion tracking setup to objectively analyze and assess the way operators perform colonoscopies, including an analysis of wrist and elbow joint motions. Subsequently, we conducted a validation study to verify whether our motion analysis could discriminate novice colonoscopists from experts. Participants navigated a wooden bench-top model using a standard colonoscope while their motions were tracked. Results: The developed motion tracking setup allowed colonoscopists of varying levels of proficiency to have their colonoscope manipulation assessed, and was able to be operated by a trained non-technical operator. Novice operators had significantly greater median times (101.5 vs. 31.5 s) and number of hand movements (62.0 vs. 21.5) than experts. Experts, however, spent a significantly greater proportion of time in extreme ranges of wrist and elbow joint motion than novices. Conclusion: We have developed and implemented a hand and joint motion analysis system that is able to discriminate novices from experts based on objective measures of motion. These metrics could, thus, serve as proxies for technical proficiency during training.",
keywords = "Colonoscopy, Medical education, Objective skill assessment, Simulation-based training",
author = "Holden, {Matthew S.} and Wang, {Chang Nancy} and Kyle MacNeil and Ben Church and Lawrence Hookey and Gabor Fichtinger and Tamas Ungi",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1007/s11548-017-1676-4",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery",
issn = "1861-6410",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Objective assessment of colonoscope manipulation skills in colonoscopy training

AU - Holden, Matthew S.

AU - Wang, Chang Nancy

AU - MacNeil, Kyle

AU - Church, Ben

AU - Hookey, Lawrence

AU - Fichtinger, Gabor

AU - Ungi, Tamas

PY - 2017/10/30

Y1 - 2017/10/30

N2 - Objective: Manipulation of the colonoscope is a technical challenge for novice clinicians which is best learned in a simulated environment. It involves the coordination of scope tip steering with scope insertion, using a rotated image as reference. The purpose of this work is to develop and validate a system which objectively assesses colonoscopy technical skills proficiency in an arbitrary training environment, allowing novices to assess their technical proficiency prior to real patient encounters. Methods: We implemented a motion tracking setup to objectively analyze and assess the way operators perform colonoscopies, including an analysis of wrist and elbow joint motions. Subsequently, we conducted a validation study to verify whether our motion analysis could discriminate novice colonoscopists from experts. Participants navigated a wooden bench-top model using a standard colonoscope while their motions were tracked. Results: The developed motion tracking setup allowed colonoscopists of varying levels of proficiency to have their colonoscope manipulation assessed, and was able to be operated by a trained non-technical operator. Novice operators had significantly greater median times (101.5 vs. 31.5 s) and number of hand movements (62.0 vs. 21.5) than experts. Experts, however, spent a significantly greater proportion of time in extreme ranges of wrist and elbow joint motion than novices. Conclusion: We have developed and implemented a hand and joint motion analysis system that is able to discriminate novices from experts based on objective measures of motion. These metrics could, thus, serve as proxies for technical proficiency during training.

AB - Objective: Manipulation of the colonoscope is a technical challenge for novice clinicians which is best learned in a simulated environment. It involves the coordination of scope tip steering with scope insertion, using a rotated image as reference. The purpose of this work is to develop and validate a system which objectively assesses colonoscopy technical skills proficiency in an arbitrary training environment, allowing novices to assess their technical proficiency prior to real patient encounters. Methods: We implemented a motion tracking setup to objectively analyze and assess the way operators perform colonoscopies, including an analysis of wrist and elbow joint motions. Subsequently, we conducted a validation study to verify whether our motion analysis could discriminate novice colonoscopists from experts. Participants navigated a wooden bench-top model using a standard colonoscope while their motions were tracked. Results: The developed motion tracking setup allowed colonoscopists of varying levels of proficiency to have their colonoscope manipulation assessed, and was able to be operated by a trained non-technical operator. Novice operators had significantly greater median times (101.5 vs. 31.5 s) and number of hand movements (62.0 vs. 21.5) than experts. Experts, however, spent a significantly greater proportion of time in extreme ranges of wrist and elbow joint motion than novices. Conclusion: We have developed and implemented a hand and joint motion analysis system that is able to discriminate novices from experts based on objective measures of motion. These metrics could, thus, serve as proxies for technical proficiency during training.

KW - Colonoscopy

KW - Medical education

KW - Objective skill assessment

KW - Simulation-based training

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85032669611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85032669611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11548-017-1676-4

DO - 10.1007/s11548-017-1676-4

M3 - Article

C2 - 29086234

AN - SCOPUS:85032669611

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery

JF - Computer-Assisted Radiology and Surgery

SN - 1861-6410

ER -