Object features used by humans and monkeys to identify rotated shapes

Kristina J Nielsen, Nikos K. Logothetis, Gregor Rainer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Humans and rhesus monkeys can identify shapes that have been rotated in the picture plane. Recognition of rotated shapes can be as efficient as recognition of upright shapes. Here we investigate whether subjects showing view-invariant performance use the same object features to identify upright and rotated versions of a shape. We find marked differences between humans and monkeys. While humans tend to use the same features independent of shape orientation, monkeys use unique features for each orientation. Humans are able to generalize to a greater-degree across orientation changes than rhesus monkey observers, who tend to relearn separate problems at each orientation rather than flexibly apply previously learned knowledge to novel problems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number9
JournalJournal of Vision
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 22 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Haplorhini
Macaca mulatta

Keywords

  • Macaca mulatta
  • Object recognition
  • View-invariance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Object features used by humans and monkeys to identify rotated shapes. / Nielsen, Kristina J; Logothetis, Nikos K.; Rainer, Gregor.

In: Journal of Vision, Vol. 8, No. 2, 9, 22.02.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nielsen, Kristina J ; Logothetis, Nikos K. ; Rainer, Gregor. / Object features used by humans and monkeys to identify rotated shapes. In: Journal of Vision. 2008 ; Vol. 8, No. 2.
@article{e3c9eb42439e4d99b2850ca0a899368f,
title = "Object features used by humans and monkeys to identify rotated shapes",
abstract = "Humans and rhesus monkeys can identify shapes that have been rotated in the picture plane. Recognition of rotated shapes can be as efficient as recognition of upright shapes. Here we investigate whether subjects showing view-invariant performance use the same object features to identify upright and rotated versions of a shape. We find marked differences between humans and monkeys. While humans tend to use the same features independent of shape orientation, monkeys use unique features for each orientation. Humans are able to generalize to a greater-degree across orientation changes than rhesus monkey observers, who tend to relearn separate problems at each orientation rather than flexibly apply previously learned knowledge to novel problems.",
keywords = "Macaca mulatta, Object recognition, View-invariance",
author = "Nielsen, {Kristina J} and Logothetis, {Nikos K.} and Gregor Rainer",
year = "2008",
month = "2",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1167/8.2.9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Journal of Vision",
issn = "1534-7362",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Object features used by humans and monkeys to identify rotated shapes

AU - Nielsen, Kristina J

AU - Logothetis, Nikos K.

AU - Rainer, Gregor

PY - 2008/2/22

Y1 - 2008/2/22

N2 - Humans and rhesus monkeys can identify shapes that have been rotated in the picture plane. Recognition of rotated shapes can be as efficient as recognition of upright shapes. Here we investigate whether subjects showing view-invariant performance use the same object features to identify upright and rotated versions of a shape. We find marked differences between humans and monkeys. While humans tend to use the same features independent of shape orientation, monkeys use unique features for each orientation. Humans are able to generalize to a greater-degree across orientation changes than rhesus monkey observers, who tend to relearn separate problems at each orientation rather than flexibly apply previously learned knowledge to novel problems.

AB - Humans and rhesus monkeys can identify shapes that have been rotated in the picture plane. Recognition of rotated shapes can be as efficient as recognition of upright shapes. Here we investigate whether subjects showing view-invariant performance use the same object features to identify upright and rotated versions of a shape. We find marked differences between humans and monkeys. While humans tend to use the same features independent of shape orientation, monkeys use unique features for each orientation. Humans are able to generalize to a greater-degree across orientation changes than rhesus monkey observers, who tend to relearn separate problems at each orientation rather than flexibly apply previously learned knowledge to novel problems.

KW - Macaca mulatta

KW - Object recognition

KW - View-invariance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=39749136232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=39749136232&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/8.2.9

DO - 10.1167/8.2.9

M3 - Article

C2 - 18318635

AN - SCOPUS:39749136232

VL - 8

JO - Journal of Vision

JF - Journal of Vision

SN - 1534-7362

IS - 2

M1 - 9

ER -