Novel automated morphometric and kinematic handwriting assessment: A validity study in children with ASD and ADHD

Benjamin Dirlikov, Laurent Younes, Mary Beth Nebel, Mary Katherine Martinelli, Alyssa Nicole Tiedemann, Carolyn A. Koch, Diana Fiorilli, Amy J. Bastian, Martha Bridge Denckla, Michael I. Miller, Stewart H. Mostofsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study presents construct validity for a novel automated morphometric and kinematic handwriting assessment, including (1) convergent validity, establishing reliability of automated measures with traditional manual-derived Minnesota Handwriting Assessment (MHA), and (2) discriminant validity, establishing that the automated methods distinguish populations of children with previously reported impairments in handwriting. Results revealed standard (manual derived) MHA, and comparable automated handwriting scores were highly correlated, providing evidence for convergent validity. Participants in the discriminant validity study included 167 children (ages 7–12 years old; 65 typically developing [TD], 45 attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], and 57 autism spectrum disorder [ASD]). Repeated measures ANOVAs were employed to test for diagnostic differences across conditions and groups; follow-up correlations using letter form were conducted to identify associations between handwriting and neuropsychological performance. Diagnostic group comparisons provided evidence of discriminant validity, revealing elevated letter-form scores (worse performance) in children with ASD and ADHD groups compared to TD children; children with ASD showed the greatest letter-form impairment. These results provide strong evidence of construct validity for this novel automated handwriting assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-201
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 3 2017

Fingerprint

handwriting
Handwriting
Pervasive Child Development Disorders
Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Biomechanical Phenomena
validity
child
assessment
autism
measurement method
ADHD
novel
letter
construct validity
diagnostic
score
performance
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Reproducibility of Results
Analysis of Variance

Keywords

  • Developmental disorders
  • handwriting
  • motor control

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Occupational Therapy

Cite this

Novel automated morphometric and kinematic handwriting assessment : A validity study in children with ASD and ADHD. / Dirlikov, Benjamin; Younes, Laurent; Nebel, Mary Beth; Martinelli, Mary Katherine; Tiedemann, Alyssa Nicole; Koch, Carolyn A.; Fiorilli, Diana; Bastian, Amy J.; Denckla, Martha Bridge; Miller, Michael I.; Mostofsky, Stewart H.

In: Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, Vol. 10, No. 2, 03.04.2017, p. 185-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dirlikov, Benjamin; Younes, Laurent; Nebel, Mary Beth; Martinelli, Mary Katherine; Tiedemann, Alyssa Nicole; Koch, Carolyn A.; Fiorilli, Diana; Bastian, Amy J.; Denckla, Martha Bridge; Miller, Michael I.; Mostofsky, Stewart H. / Novel automated morphometric and kinematic handwriting assessment : A validity study in children with ASD and ADHD.

In: Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention, Vol. 10, No. 2, 03.04.2017, p. 185-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{85bf58b5a3ea499fb58747926e3cae09,
title = "Novel automated morphometric and kinematic handwriting assessment: A validity study in children with ASD and ADHD",
abstract = "This study presents construct validity for a novel automated morphometric and kinematic handwriting assessment, including (1) convergent validity, establishing reliability of automated measures with traditional manual-derived Minnesota Handwriting Assessment (MHA), and (2) discriminant validity, establishing that the automated methods distinguish populations of children with previously reported impairments in handwriting. Results revealed standard (manual derived) MHA, and comparable automated handwriting scores were highly correlated, providing evidence for convergent validity. Participants in the discriminant validity study included 167 children (ages 7–12 years old; 65 typically developing [TD], 45 attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], and 57 autism spectrum disorder [ASD]). Repeated measures ANOVAs were employed to test for diagnostic differences across conditions and groups; follow-up correlations using letter form were conducted to identify associations between handwriting and neuropsychological performance. Diagnostic group comparisons provided evidence of discriminant validity, revealing elevated letter-form scores (worse performance) in children with ASD and ADHD groups compared to TD children; children with ASD showed the greatest letter-form impairment. These results provide strong evidence of construct validity for this novel automated handwriting assessment.",
keywords = "Developmental disorders, handwriting, motor control",
author = "Benjamin Dirlikov and Laurent Younes and Nebel, {Mary Beth} and Martinelli, {Mary Katherine} and Tiedemann, {Alyssa Nicole} and Koch, {Carolyn A.} and Diana Fiorilli and Bastian, {Amy J.} and Denckla, {Martha Bridge} and Miller, {Michael I.} and Mostofsky, {Stewart H.}",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/19411243.2017.1304841",
volume = "10",
pages = "185--201",
journal = "Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention",
issn = "1941-1243",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Novel automated morphometric and kinematic handwriting assessment

T2 - Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention

AU - Dirlikov,Benjamin

AU - Younes,Laurent

AU - Nebel,Mary Beth

AU - Martinelli,Mary Katherine

AU - Tiedemann,Alyssa Nicole

AU - Koch,Carolyn A.

AU - Fiorilli,Diana

AU - Bastian,Amy J.

AU - Denckla,Martha Bridge

AU - Miller,Michael I.

AU - Mostofsky,Stewart H.

PY - 2017/4/3

Y1 - 2017/4/3

N2 - This study presents construct validity for a novel automated morphometric and kinematic handwriting assessment, including (1) convergent validity, establishing reliability of automated measures with traditional manual-derived Minnesota Handwriting Assessment (MHA), and (2) discriminant validity, establishing that the automated methods distinguish populations of children with previously reported impairments in handwriting. Results revealed standard (manual derived) MHA, and comparable automated handwriting scores were highly correlated, providing evidence for convergent validity. Participants in the discriminant validity study included 167 children (ages 7–12 years old; 65 typically developing [TD], 45 attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], and 57 autism spectrum disorder [ASD]). Repeated measures ANOVAs were employed to test for diagnostic differences across conditions and groups; follow-up correlations using letter form were conducted to identify associations between handwriting and neuropsychological performance. Diagnostic group comparisons provided evidence of discriminant validity, revealing elevated letter-form scores (worse performance) in children with ASD and ADHD groups compared to TD children; children with ASD showed the greatest letter-form impairment. These results provide strong evidence of construct validity for this novel automated handwriting assessment.

AB - This study presents construct validity for a novel automated morphometric and kinematic handwriting assessment, including (1) convergent validity, establishing reliability of automated measures with traditional manual-derived Minnesota Handwriting Assessment (MHA), and (2) discriminant validity, establishing that the automated methods distinguish populations of children with previously reported impairments in handwriting. Results revealed standard (manual derived) MHA, and comparable automated handwriting scores were highly correlated, providing evidence for convergent validity. Participants in the discriminant validity study included 167 children (ages 7–12 years old; 65 typically developing [TD], 45 attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], and 57 autism spectrum disorder [ASD]). Repeated measures ANOVAs were employed to test for diagnostic differences across conditions and groups; follow-up correlations using letter form were conducted to identify associations between handwriting and neuropsychological performance. Diagnostic group comparisons provided evidence of discriminant validity, revealing elevated letter-form scores (worse performance) in children with ASD and ADHD groups compared to TD children; children with ASD showed the greatest letter-form impairment. These results provide strong evidence of construct validity for this novel automated handwriting assessment.

KW - Developmental disorders

KW - handwriting

KW - motor control

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017280885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017280885&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/19411243.2017.1304841

DO - 10.1080/19411243.2017.1304841

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 185

EP - 201

JO - Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention

JF - Journal of Occupational Therapy, Schools, and Early Intervention

SN - 1941-1243

IS - 2

ER -