Not-for-profit versus for-profit health care providers-Part I: comparing and contrasting their records.

Timothy Rotarius, Antonio Jose Trujillo, Aaron Liberman, Bernardo Ramirez

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The debate over which health care providers are most capably meeting their responsibilities in serving the public's interest continues unabated, and the comparisons of not-for-profit (NFP) versus for-profit (FP) hospitals remain at the epicenter of the discussion. From the perspective of available factual information, which of the two sides to this debate is correct? This article is part I of a 2-part series on comparing and contrasting the performance records of NFP health care providers with their FP counterparts. Although it is demonstrated that both NFP and FP providers perform virtuous and selfless feats on behalf of America's public, it is also shown that both camps are involved in potentially willful clinical and administrative missteps. Part I contains the background information (eg, legal differences, perspectives on social responsibility, and types of questionable and fraudulent behavior) that is necessary to adequately understand the scope of the comparison issue. Part II offers actual comparisons of the 2 organizational structures using several disparate factors such as specific organizational behaviors, approach to the health care priorities of cost and quality, and business-focused goals of profits, efficiency, and community benefit.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296-310
Number of pages15
JournalThe health care manager.
Volume24
Issue number4
StatePublished - Oct 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Personnel
profit
health care
Health Priorities
Social Responsibility
Health Care Costs
organizational behavior
social responsibility
public interest
available information
organizational structure
efficiency
responsibility
costs
community
performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy
  • Care Planning
  • Health(social science)
  • Leadership and Management

Cite this

Not-for-profit versus for-profit health care providers-Part I : comparing and contrasting their records. / Rotarius, Timothy; Trujillo, Antonio Jose; Liberman, Aaron; Ramirez, Bernardo.

In: The health care manager., Vol. 24, No. 4, 10.2005, p. 296-310.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{6e5c16cf07f8496cad1a8f2a6ad01e75,
title = "Not-for-profit versus for-profit health care providers-Part I: comparing and contrasting their records.",
abstract = "The debate over which health care providers are most capably meeting their responsibilities in serving the public's interest continues unabated, and the comparisons of not-for-profit (NFP) versus for-profit (FP) hospitals remain at the epicenter of the discussion. From the perspective of available factual information, which of the two sides to this debate is correct? This article is part I of a 2-part series on comparing and contrasting the performance records of NFP health care providers with their FP counterparts. Although it is demonstrated that both NFP and FP providers perform virtuous and selfless feats on behalf of America's public, it is also shown that both camps are involved in potentially willful clinical and administrative missteps. Part I contains the background information (eg, legal differences, perspectives on social responsibility, and types of questionable and fraudulent behavior) that is necessary to adequately understand the scope of the comparison issue. Part II offers actual comparisons of the 2 organizational structures using several disparate factors such as specific organizational behaviors, approach to the health care priorities of cost and quality, and business-focused goals of profits, efficiency, and community benefit.",
author = "Timothy Rotarius and Trujillo, {Antonio Jose} and Aaron Liberman and Bernardo Ramirez",
year = "2005",
month = "10",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "296--310",
journal = "Health Care Manager",
issn = "1525-5794",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Not-for-profit versus for-profit health care providers-Part I

T2 - comparing and contrasting their records.

AU - Rotarius, Timothy

AU - Trujillo, Antonio Jose

AU - Liberman, Aaron

AU - Ramirez, Bernardo

PY - 2005/10

Y1 - 2005/10

N2 - The debate over which health care providers are most capably meeting their responsibilities in serving the public's interest continues unabated, and the comparisons of not-for-profit (NFP) versus for-profit (FP) hospitals remain at the epicenter of the discussion. From the perspective of available factual information, which of the two sides to this debate is correct? This article is part I of a 2-part series on comparing and contrasting the performance records of NFP health care providers with their FP counterparts. Although it is demonstrated that both NFP and FP providers perform virtuous and selfless feats on behalf of America's public, it is also shown that both camps are involved in potentially willful clinical and administrative missteps. Part I contains the background information (eg, legal differences, perspectives on social responsibility, and types of questionable and fraudulent behavior) that is necessary to adequately understand the scope of the comparison issue. Part II offers actual comparisons of the 2 organizational structures using several disparate factors such as specific organizational behaviors, approach to the health care priorities of cost and quality, and business-focused goals of profits, efficiency, and community benefit.

AB - The debate over which health care providers are most capably meeting their responsibilities in serving the public's interest continues unabated, and the comparisons of not-for-profit (NFP) versus for-profit (FP) hospitals remain at the epicenter of the discussion. From the perspective of available factual information, which of the two sides to this debate is correct? This article is part I of a 2-part series on comparing and contrasting the performance records of NFP health care providers with their FP counterparts. Although it is demonstrated that both NFP and FP providers perform virtuous and selfless feats on behalf of America's public, it is also shown that both camps are involved in potentially willful clinical and administrative missteps. Part I contains the background information (eg, legal differences, perspectives on social responsibility, and types of questionable and fraudulent behavior) that is necessary to adequately understand the scope of the comparison issue. Part II offers actual comparisons of the 2 organizational structures using several disparate factors such as specific organizational behaviors, approach to the health care priorities of cost and quality, and business-focused goals of profits, efficiency, and community benefit.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644876628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644876628&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 16284513

AN - SCOPUS:33644876628

VL - 24

SP - 296

EP - 310

JO - Health Care Manager

JF - Health Care Manager

SN - 1525-5794

IS - 4

ER -