Normalization in PET group comparison studies-The importance of a valid reference region

Per Borghammer, Kristjana Yr Jonsdottir, Paul Cumming, Karen Ostergaard, Kim Vang, Mahmoud Ashkanian, Manoucher Vafaee, Peter Iversen, Albert Gjedde

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: In positron emission tomography (PET) studies of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and metabolism, the large interindividual variation commonly is minimized by normalization to the global mean prior to statistical analysis. This approach requires that no between-group or between-state differences exist in the normalization region. Given the variability typical of global CBF and the practical limit on sample size, small group differences in global mean easily elude detection, but still bias the comparison, with profound consequences for the physiological interpretation of the results. Materials and methods: Quantitative [15O]H2O PET recordings of CBF were obtained in 45 healthy subjects (21-81 years) and 14 patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE). With volume-of-interest (VOI) and voxel-based statistics, we conducted regression analyses of CBF as function of age in the healthy group, and compared the HE group to a subset of the controls. We compared absolute CBF values, and CBF normalized to the gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) means. In additional simulation experiments, we manipulated the cortical values of 12 healthy subjects and compared these to unaltered control data. Results: In healthy aging, CBF was shown to be unchanged in WM and central regions. In contrast, with normalization to the GM mean, CBF displayed positive correlation with age in the central regions. Very similar artifactual increases were seen in the HE comparison and also in the simulation experiment. Conclusion: Ratio normalization to the global mean readily elevates CBF in unchanged regions when a systematic between-group difference exists in gCBF, also when this difference is below the detection threshold. We suggest that the routine normalization to the global mean in earlier studies resulted in spurious interpretations of perturbed CBF. Normalization to central WM yields less biased results in aging and HE and could potentially serve as a normalization reference region in other disorders as well.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)529-540
Number of pages12
JournalNeuroImage
Volume40
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cerebrovascular Circulation
Positron-Emission Tomography
Hepatic Encephalopathy
Healthy Volunteers
Sample Size

Keywords

  • CBF
  • Glucose
  • Normalization
  • Parkinson's disease
  • PET
  • White matter

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neurology

Cite this

Borghammer, P., Jonsdottir, K. Y., Cumming, P., Ostergaard, K., Vang, K., Ashkanian, M., ... Gjedde, A. (2008). Normalization in PET group comparison studies-The importance of a valid reference region. NeuroImage, 40(2), 529-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.057

Normalization in PET group comparison studies-The importance of a valid reference region. / Borghammer, Per; Jonsdottir, Kristjana Yr; Cumming, Paul; Ostergaard, Karen; Vang, Kim; Ashkanian, Mahmoud; Vafaee, Manoucher; Iversen, Peter; Gjedde, Albert.

In: NeuroImage, Vol. 40, No. 2, 01.04.2008, p. 529-540.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Borghammer, P, Jonsdottir, KY, Cumming, P, Ostergaard, K, Vang, K, Ashkanian, M, Vafaee, M, Iversen, P & Gjedde, A 2008, 'Normalization in PET group comparison studies-The importance of a valid reference region', NeuroImage, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 529-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.057
Borghammer P, Jonsdottir KY, Cumming P, Ostergaard K, Vang K, Ashkanian M et al. Normalization in PET group comparison studies-The importance of a valid reference region. NeuroImage. 2008 Apr 1;40(2):529-540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.057
Borghammer, Per ; Jonsdottir, Kristjana Yr ; Cumming, Paul ; Ostergaard, Karen ; Vang, Kim ; Ashkanian, Mahmoud ; Vafaee, Manoucher ; Iversen, Peter ; Gjedde, Albert. / Normalization in PET group comparison studies-The importance of a valid reference region. In: NeuroImage. 2008 ; Vol. 40, No. 2. pp. 529-540.
@article{2c9bcdf6e38540889032ea63b26b4e05,
title = "Normalization in PET group comparison studies-The importance of a valid reference region",
abstract = "Introduction: In positron emission tomography (PET) studies of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and metabolism, the large interindividual variation commonly is minimized by normalization to the global mean prior to statistical analysis. This approach requires that no between-group or between-state differences exist in the normalization region. Given the variability typical of global CBF and the practical limit on sample size, small group differences in global mean easily elude detection, but still bias the comparison, with profound consequences for the physiological interpretation of the results. Materials and methods: Quantitative [15O]H2O PET recordings of CBF were obtained in 45 healthy subjects (21-81 years) and 14 patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE). With volume-of-interest (VOI) and voxel-based statistics, we conducted regression analyses of CBF as function of age in the healthy group, and compared the HE group to a subset of the controls. We compared absolute CBF values, and CBF normalized to the gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) means. In additional simulation experiments, we manipulated the cortical values of 12 healthy subjects and compared these to unaltered control data. Results: In healthy aging, CBF was shown to be unchanged in WM and central regions. In contrast, with normalization to the GM mean, CBF displayed positive correlation with age in the central regions. Very similar artifactual increases were seen in the HE comparison and also in the simulation experiment. Conclusion: Ratio normalization to the global mean readily elevates CBF in unchanged regions when a systematic between-group difference exists in gCBF, also when this difference is below the detection threshold. We suggest that the routine normalization to the global mean in earlier studies resulted in spurious interpretations of perturbed CBF. Normalization to central WM yields less biased results in aging and HE and could potentially serve as a normalization reference region in other disorders as well.",
keywords = "CBF, Glucose, Normalization, Parkinson's disease, PET, White matter",
author = "Per Borghammer and Jonsdottir, {Kristjana Yr} and Paul Cumming and Karen Ostergaard and Kim Vang and Mahmoud Ashkanian and Manoucher Vafaee and Peter Iversen and Albert Gjedde",
year = "2008",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.057",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "529--540",
journal = "NeuroImage",
issn = "1053-8119",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Normalization in PET group comparison studies-The importance of a valid reference region

AU - Borghammer, Per

AU - Jonsdottir, Kristjana Yr

AU - Cumming, Paul

AU - Ostergaard, Karen

AU - Vang, Kim

AU - Ashkanian, Mahmoud

AU - Vafaee, Manoucher

AU - Iversen, Peter

AU - Gjedde, Albert

PY - 2008/4/1

Y1 - 2008/4/1

N2 - Introduction: In positron emission tomography (PET) studies of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and metabolism, the large interindividual variation commonly is minimized by normalization to the global mean prior to statistical analysis. This approach requires that no between-group or between-state differences exist in the normalization region. Given the variability typical of global CBF and the practical limit on sample size, small group differences in global mean easily elude detection, but still bias the comparison, with profound consequences for the physiological interpretation of the results. Materials and methods: Quantitative [15O]H2O PET recordings of CBF were obtained in 45 healthy subjects (21-81 years) and 14 patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE). With volume-of-interest (VOI) and voxel-based statistics, we conducted regression analyses of CBF as function of age in the healthy group, and compared the HE group to a subset of the controls. We compared absolute CBF values, and CBF normalized to the gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) means. In additional simulation experiments, we manipulated the cortical values of 12 healthy subjects and compared these to unaltered control data. Results: In healthy aging, CBF was shown to be unchanged in WM and central regions. In contrast, with normalization to the GM mean, CBF displayed positive correlation with age in the central regions. Very similar artifactual increases were seen in the HE comparison and also in the simulation experiment. Conclusion: Ratio normalization to the global mean readily elevates CBF in unchanged regions when a systematic between-group difference exists in gCBF, also when this difference is below the detection threshold. We suggest that the routine normalization to the global mean in earlier studies resulted in spurious interpretations of perturbed CBF. Normalization to central WM yields less biased results in aging and HE and could potentially serve as a normalization reference region in other disorders as well.

AB - Introduction: In positron emission tomography (PET) studies of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and metabolism, the large interindividual variation commonly is minimized by normalization to the global mean prior to statistical analysis. This approach requires that no between-group or between-state differences exist in the normalization region. Given the variability typical of global CBF and the practical limit on sample size, small group differences in global mean easily elude detection, but still bias the comparison, with profound consequences for the physiological interpretation of the results. Materials and methods: Quantitative [15O]H2O PET recordings of CBF were obtained in 45 healthy subjects (21-81 years) and 14 patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE). With volume-of-interest (VOI) and voxel-based statistics, we conducted regression analyses of CBF as function of age in the healthy group, and compared the HE group to a subset of the controls. We compared absolute CBF values, and CBF normalized to the gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) means. In additional simulation experiments, we manipulated the cortical values of 12 healthy subjects and compared these to unaltered control data. Results: In healthy aging, CBF was shown to be unchanged in WM and central regions. In contrast, with normalization to the GM mean, CBF displayed positive correlation with age in the central regions. Very similar artifactual increases were seen in the HE comparison and also in the simulation experiment. Conclusion: Ratio normalization to the global mean readily elevates CBF in unchanged regions when a systematic between-group difference exists in gCBF, also when this difference is below the detection threshold. We suggest that the routine normalization to the global mean in earlier studies resulted in spurious interpretations of perturbed CBF. Normalization to central WM yields less biased results in aging and HE and could potentially serve as a normalization reference region in other disorders as well.

KW - CBF

KW - Glucose

KW - Normalization

KW - Parkinson's disease

KW - PET

KW - White matter

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40849087799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=40849087799&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.057

DO - 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.057

M3 - Article

C2 - 18258457

AN - SCOPUS:40849087799

VL - 40

SP - 529

EP - 540

JO - NeuroImage

JF - NeuroImage

SN - 1053-8119

IS - 2

ER -