Normal venous phase documented during angiography in patients with spinal vascular malformations

Incidence and clinical implications

D. Eckart Sorte, M. Obrzut, E. Wyse, Philippe Gailloud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and Purpose: A key angiographic sign observed in patients with spinal vascular malformations is the absence of a normal venous phase. While this finding alone is often believed to rule out a lesion impacting the perimedullary venous drainage, the observation of a venous phase in several patients with vascular malformations led us to reconsider the validity of that sign. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one patients with 6 spinal arteriovenous malformations, 16 perimedullary arteriovenous fistulas, 61 spinal epidural or dural AVFs, and 1 paravertebral AVF (2 patients had multiple lesions) were reviewed. The venous phase was defined as normal, absent, or indeterminate. The venous phase timing was analyzed in patients with spinal dural or epidural AVFs. RESULTS: The existence of a venous phase could not be determined for technical reasons in 23 patients. A venous phase was documented in 25 of 58 patients (43%), including 16 of 49 vascular malformations (40.0%) with perimedullary venous drainage. Twelve of the 30 patients (40.0%) with dural or epidural AVFs had a normal venous phase, appearing, on average, 10.1 seconds and best visualized 15.0 seconds after opacification of the artery of Adamkiewicz. CONCLUSIONS: A normal venous phase was observed in 43% of patients with spinal vascular malformations, and within an acceptable delay (=18 seconds) in 40% of slow-flow AVFs. While it remains an important angiographic sign, the observation of a normal venous phase cannot be used to exclude the presence of a vascular malformation or justify interrupting a diagnostic spinal angiogram.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)565-571
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2016

Fingerprint

Vascular Malformations
Angiography
Incidence
Drainage
Observation
Arteriovenous Malformations
Arteriovenous Fistula
Arteries

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Normal venous phase documented during angiography in patients with spinal vascular malformations : Incidence and clinical implications. / Eckart Sorte, D.; Obrzut, M.; Wyse, E.; Gailloud, Philippe.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 37, No. 3, 01.03.2016, p. 565-571.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f18e5d83b252432e96c1f81be4194554,
title = "Normal venous phase documented during angiography in patients with spinal vascular malformations: Incidence and clinical implications",
abstract = "Background and Purpose: A key angiographic sign observed in patients with spinal vascular malformations is the absence of a normal venous phase. While this finding alone is often believed to rule out a lesion impacting the perimedullary venous drainage, the observation of a venous phase in several patients with vascular malformations led us to reconsider the validity of that sign. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one patients with 6 spinal arteriovenous malformations, 16 perimedullary arteriovenous fistulas, 61 spinal epidural or dural AVFs, and 1 paravertebral AVF (2 patients had multiple lesions) were reviewed. The venous phase was defined as normal, absent, or indeterminate. The venous phase timing was analyzed in patients with spinal dural or epidural AVFs. RESULTS: The existence of a venous phase could not be determined for technical reasons in 23 patients. A venous phase was documented in 25 of 58 patients (43{\%}), including 16 of 49 vascular malformations (40.0{\%}) with perimedullary venous drainage. Twelve of the 30 patients (40.0{\%}) with dural or epidural AVFs had a normal venous phase, appearing, on average, 10.1 seconds and best visualized 15.0 seconds after opacification of the artery of Adamkiewicz. CONCLUSIONS: A normal venous phase was observed in 43{\%} of patients with spinal vascular malformations, and within an acceptable delay (=18 seconds) in 40{\%} of slow-flow AVFs. While it remains an important angiographic sign, the observation of a normal venous phase cannot be used to exclude the presence of a vascular malformation or justify interrupting a diagnostic spinal angiogram.",
author = "{Eckart Sorte}, D. and M. Obrzut and E. Wyse and Philippe Gailloud",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3174/ajnr.A4601",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "565--571",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Normal venous phase documented during angiography in patients with spinal vascular malformations

T2 - Incidence and clinical implications

AU - Eckart Sorte, D.

AU - Obrzut, M.

AU - Wyse, E.

AU - Gailloud, Philippe

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Background and Purpose: A key angiographic sign observed in patients with spinal vascular malformations is the absence of a normal venous phase. While this finding alone is often believed to rule out a lesion impacting the perimedullary venous drainage, the observation of a venous phase in several patients with vascular malformations led us to reconsider the validity of that sign. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one patients with 6 spinal arteriovenous malformations, 16 perimedullary arteriovenous fistulas, 61 spinal epidural or dural AVFs, and 1 paravertebral AVF (2 patients had multiple lesions) were reviewed. The venous phase was defined as normal, absent, or indeterminate. The venous phase timing was analyzed in patients with spinal dural or epidural AVFs. RESULTS: The existence of a venous phase could not be determined for technical reasons in 23 patients. A venous phase was documented in 25 of 58 patients (43%), including 16 of 49 vascular malformations (40.0%) with perimedullary venous drainage. Twelve of the 30 patients (40.0%) with dural or epidural AVFs had a normal venous phase, appearing, on average, 10.1 seconds and best visualized 15.0 seconds after opacification of the artery of Adamkiewicz. CONCLUSIONS: A normal venous phase was observed in 43% of patients with spinal vascular malformations, and within an acceptable delay (=18 seconds) in 40% of slow-flow AVFs. While it remains an important angiographic sign, the observation of a normal venous phase cannot be used to exclude the presence of a vascular malformation or justify interrupting a diagnostic spinal angiogram.

AB - Background and Purpose: A key angiographic sign observed in patients with spinal vascular malformations is the absence of a normal venous phase. While this finding alone is often believed to rule out a lesion impacting the perimedullary venous drainage, the observation of a venous phase in several patients with vascular malformations led us to reconsider the validity of that sign. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one patients with 6 spinal arteriovenous malformations, 16 perimedullary arteriovenous fistulas, 61 spinal epidural or dural AVFs, and 1 paravertebral AVF (2 patients had multiple lesions) were reviewed. The venous phase was defined as normal, absent, or indeterminate. The venous phase timing was analyzed in patients with spinal dural or epidural AVFs. RESULTS: The existence of a venous phase could not be determined for technical reasons in 23 patients. A venous phase was documented in 25 of 58 patients (43%), including 16 of 49 vascular malformations (40.0%) with perimedullary venous drainage. Twelve of the 30 patients (40.0%) with dural or epidural AVFs had a normal venous phase, appearing, on average, 10.1 seconds and best visualized 15.0 seconds after opacification of the artery of Adamkiewicz. CONCLUSIONS: A normal venous phase was observed in 43% of patients with spinal vascular malformations, and within an acceptable delay (=18 seconds) in 40% of slow-flow AVFs. While it remains an important angiographic sign, the observation of a normal venous phase cannot be used to exclude the presence of a vascular malformation or justify interrupting a diagnostic spinal angiogram.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84961193404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84961193404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3174/ajnr.A4601

DO - 10.3174/ajnr.A4601

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 565

EP - 571

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 3

ER -