No. 164-Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain

John F. Jarrell, George A. Vilos, Catherine Allaire, Susan Burgess, Claude Fortin, Robert Gerwin, Louise Lapensee, Robert H. Lea, Nicholas A. Leyland, Paul Martyn, Hassan Shenassa, Paul Taenzer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: To improve the understanding of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and to provide evidence-based guidelines of value to primary care health professionals, general obstetricians and gynaecologists, and those who specialize in chronic pain. Disclaimer: This guideline has been reaffirmed for use and approved by Board of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. A revision is underway. Burden of Suffering: CPP is a common, debilitating condition affecting women. It accounts for substantial personal suffering and health care expenditure for interventions, including multiple consultations and medical and surgical therapies. Because the underlying pathophysiology of this complex condition is poorly understood, these treatments have met with variable success rates. Outcomes: Effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic options, including assessment of myofascial dysfunction, multidisciplinary care, a rehabilitation model that emphasizes achieving higher function with some pain rather than a cure, and appropriate use of opiates for the chronic pain state. Evidence: Medline and the Cochrane Database from 1982 to 2004 were searched for articles in English on subjects related to CPP, including acute care management, myofascial dysfunction, and medical and surgical therapeutic options. The committee reviewed the literature and available data from a needs assessment of subjects with CPP, using a consensus approach to develop recommendations. Values: The quality of the evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Recommendations for practice were ranked according to the method described in that report (Table 1). Recommendations: The recommendations are directed to the following areas: (a) an understanding of the needs of women with CPP; (b) general clinical assessment; (c) practical assessment of pain levels; (d) myofascial pain; (e) medications and surgical procedures; (d) principles of opiate management; (f) increased use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); (g) documentation of the surgically observed extent of disease; (h) alternative therapies; (i) access to multidisciplinary care models that have components of physical therapy (such as exercise and posture) and psychology (such as cognitive-behavioural therapy), along with other medical disciplines, such as gynaecology and anesthesia; G) increased attention to CPP in the training of health care professionals; and (k) increased attention to CPP in formal, high-calibre research. The committee recommends that provincial ministries of health pursue the creation of multidisciplinary teams to manage the condition.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e747-e787
JournalJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada
Volume40
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2018

Fingerprint

Pelvic Pain
Chronic Pain
Consensus
Guidelines
Opiate Alkaloids
Delivery of Health Care
Therapeutics
Pain
Needs Assessment
Health
Cognitive Therapy
Advisory Committees
Pain Measurement
Complementary Therapies
Health Expenditures
Posture
Gynecology
Psychological Stress
Documentation
Primary Health Care

Keywords

  • adenomyosis
  • adhesions
  • adnexal torsion
  • complementary therapies
  • diagnostic imaging
  • endometriosis
  • endosalpingiosis
  • hormonal treatment
  • hysterectomy
  • laparoscopy
  • myofascial pain syndromes
  • ovarian cysts
  • ovarian remnant syndrome
  • pelvic congestion syndrome
  • pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Pelvic pain
  • pelvic peritoneal defects
  • residual ovary syndrome
  • uterine fibroids

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Jarrell, J. F., Vilos, G. A., Allaire, C., Burgess, S., Fortin, C., Gerwin, R., ... Taenzer, P. (2018). No. 164-Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 40(11), e747-e787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.08.015

No. 164-Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain. / Jarrell, John F.; Vilos, George A.; Allaire, Catherine; Burgess, Susan; Fortin, Claude; Gerwin, Robert; Lapensee, Louise; Lea, Robert H.; Leyland, Nicholas A.; Martyn, Paul; Shenassa, Hassan; Taenzer, Paul.

In: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, Vol. 40, No. 11, 01.11.2018, p. e747-e787.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jarrell, JF, Vilos, GA, Allaire, C, Burgess, S, Fortin, C, Gerwin, R, Lapensee, L, Lea, RH, Leyland, NA, Martyn, P, Shenassa, H & Taenzer, P 2018, 'No. 164-Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain', Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. e747-e787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogc.2018.08.015
Jarrell, John F. ; Vilos, George A. ; Allaire, Catherine ; Burgess, Susan ; Fortin, Claude ; Gerwin, Robert ; Lapensee, Louise ; Lea, Robert H. ; Leyland, Nicholas A. ; Martyn, Paul ; Shenassa, Hassan ; Taenzer, Paul. / No. 164-Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain. In: Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada. 2018 ; Vol. 40, No. 11. pp. e747-e787.
@article{60f5f93061e4422180e64fd85b1cd19e,
title = "No. 164-Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain",
abstract = "Objective: To improve the understanding of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and to provide evidence-based guidelines of value to primary care health professionals, general obstetricians and gynaecologists, and those who specialize in chronic pain. Disclaimer: This guideline has been reaffirmed for use and approved by Board of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. A revision is underway. Burden of Suffering: CPP is a common, debilitating condition affecting women. It accounts for substantial personal suffering and health care expenditure for interventions, including multiple consultations and medical and surgical therapies. Because the underlying pathophysiology of this complex condition is poorly understood, these treatments have met with variable success rates. Outcomes: Effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic options, including assessment of myofascial dysfunction, multidisciplinary care, a rehabilitation model that emphasizes achieving higher function with some pain rather than a cure, and appropriate use of opiates for the chronic pain state. Evidence: Medline and the Cochrane Database from 1982 to 2004 were searched for articles in English on subjects related to CPP, including acute care management, myofascial dysfunction, and medical and surgical therapeutic options. The committee reviewed the literature and available data from a needs assessment of subjects with CPP, using a consensus approach to develop recommendations. Values: The quality of the evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Recommendations for practice were ranked according to the method described in that report (Table 1). Recommendations: The recommendations are directed to the following areas: (a) an understanding of the needs of women with CPP; (b) general clinical assessment; (c) practical assessment of pain levels; (d) myofascial pain; (e) medications and surgical procedures; (d) principles of opiate management; (f) increased use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); (g) documentation of the surgically observed extent of disease; (h) alternative therapies; (i) access to multidisciplinary care models that have components of physical therapy (such as exercise and posture) and psychology (such as cognitive-behavioural therapy), along with other medical disciplines, such as gynaecology and anesthesia; G) increased attention to CPP in the training of health care professionals; and (k) increased attention to CPP in formal, high-calibre research. The committee recommends that provincial ministries of health pursue the creation of multidisciplinary teams to manage the condition.",
keywords = "adenomyosis, adhesions, adnexal torsion, complementary therapies, diagnostic imaging, endometriosis, endosalpingiosis, hormonal treatment, hysterectomy, laparoscopy, myofascial pain syndromes, ovarian cysts, ovarian remnant syndrome, pelvic congestion syndrome, pelvic inflammatory disease, Pelvic pain, pelvic peritoneal defects, residual ovary syndrome, uterine fibroids",
author = "Jarrell, {John F.} and Vilos, {George A.} and Catherine Allaire and Susan Burgess and Claude Fortin and Robert Gerwin and Louise Lapensee and Lea, {Robert H.} and Leyland, {Nicholas A.} and Paul Martyn and Hassan Shenassa and Paul Taenzer",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jogc.2018.08.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "e747--e787",
journal = "Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada",
issn = "1701-2163",
publisher = "Healthcare & Financial Pub.",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - No. 164-Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Chronic Pelvic Pain

AU - Jarrell, John F.

AU - Vilos, George A.

AU - Allaire, Catherine

AU - Burgess, Susan

AU - Fortin, Claude

AU - Gerwin, Robert

AU - Lapensee, Louise

AU - Lea, Robert H.

AU - Leyland, Nicholas A.

AU - Martyn, Paul

AU - Shenassa, Hassan

AU - Taenzer, Paul

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Objective: To improve the understanding of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and to provide evidence-based guidelines of value to primary care health professionals, general obstetricians and gynaecologists, and those who specialize in chronic pain. Disclaimer: This guideline has been reaffirmed for use and approved by Board of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. A revision is underway. Burden of Suffering: CPP is a common, debilitating condition affecting women. It accounts for substantial personal suffering and health care expenditure for interventions, including multiple consultations and medical and surgical therapies. Because the underlying pathophysiology of this complex condition is poorly understood, these treatments have met with variable success rates. Outcomes: Effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic options, including assessment of myofascial dysfunction, multidisciplinary care, a rehabilitation model that emphasizes achieving higher function with some pain rather than a cure, and appropriate use of opiates for the chronic pain state. Evidence: Medline and the Cochrane Database from 1982 to 2004 were searched for articles in English on subjects related to CPP, including acute care management, myofascial dysfunction, and medical and surgical therapeutic options. The committee reviewed the literature and available data from a needs assessment of subjects with CPP, using a consensus approach to develop recommendations. Values: The quality of the evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Recommendations for practice were ranked according to the method described in that report (Table 1). Recommendations: The recommendations are directed to the following areas: (a) an understanding of the needs of women with CPP; (b) general clinical assessment; (c) practical assessment of pain levels; (d) myofascial pain; (e) medications and surgical procedures; (d) principles of opiate management; (f) increased use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); (g) documentation of the surgically observed extent of disease; (h) alternative therapies; (i) access to multidisciplinary care models that have components of physical therapy (such as exercise and posture) and psychology (such as cognitive-behavioural therapy), along with other medical disciplines, such as gynaecology and anesthesia; G) increased attention to CPP in the training of health care professionals; and (k) increased attention to CPP in formal, high-calibre research. The committee recommends that provincial ministries of health pursue the creation of multidisciplinary teams to manage the condition.

AB - Objective: To improve the understanding of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and to provide evidence-based guidelines of value to primary care health professionals, general obstetricians and gynaecologists, and those who specialize in chronic pain. Disclaimer: This guideline has been reaffirmed for use and approved by Board of The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. A revision is underway. Burden of Suffering: CPP is a common, debilitating condition affecting women. It accounts for substantial personal suffering and health care expenditure for interventions, including multiple consultations and medical and surgical therapies. Because the underlying pathophysiology of this complex condition is poorly understood, these treatments have met with variable success rates. Outcomes: Effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic options, including assessment of myofascial dysfunction, multidisciplinary care, a rehabilitation model that emphasizes achieving higher function with some pain rather than a cure, and appropriate use of opiates for the chronic pain state. Evidence: Medline and the Cochrane Database from 1982 to 2004 were searched for articles in English on subjects related to CPP, including acute care management, myofascial dysfunction, and medical and surgical therapeutic options. The committee reviewed the literature and available data from a needs assessment of subjects with CPP, using a consensus approach to develop recommendations. Values: The quality of the evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Report of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. Recommendations for practice were ranked according to the method described in that report (Table 1). Recommendations: The recommendations are directed to the following areas: (a) an understanding of the needs of women with CPP; (b) general clinical assessment; (c) practical assessment of pain levels; (d) myofascial pain; (e) medications and surgical procedures; (d) principles of opiate management; (f) increased use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); (g) documentation of the surgically observed extent of disease; (h) alternative therapies; (i) access to multidisciplinary care models that have components of physical therapy (such as exercise and posture) and psychology (such as cognitive-behavioural therapy), along with other medical disciplines, such as gynaecology and anesthesia; G) increased attention to CPP in the training of health care professionals; and (k) increased attention to CPP in formal, high-calibre research. The committee recommends that provincial ministries of health pursue the creation of multidisciplinary teams to manage the condition.

KW - adenomyosis

KW - adhesions

KW - adnexal torsion

KW - complementary therapies

KW - diagnostic imaging

KW - endometriosis

KW - endosalpingiosis

KW - hormonal treatment

KW - hysterectomy

KW - laparoscopy

KW - myofascial pain syndromes

KW - ovarian cysts

KW - ovarian remnant syndrome

KW - pelvic congestion syndrome

KW - pelvic inflammatory disease

KW - Pelvic pain

KW - pelvic peritoneal defects

KW - residual ovary syndrome

KW - uterine fibroids

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056896911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056896911&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.08.015

DO - 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.08.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 30473127

AN - SCOPUS:85056896911

VL - 40

SP - e747-e787

JO - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

JF - Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada

SN - 1701-2163

IS - 11

ER -