Neuroticism, Somatic Complaints, and Disease: Is the Bark Worse than the Bite?

Paul Costa, Robert R. McCrae

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

ABSTRACT Perhaps because negative emotions are frequently expressed in physiological reactions, psychosomatic theories have often identified Neuroticism and its component traits (including anxiety, anger, and depression) as causal influences on the development of disease These views are apparently supported by correlations between physical symptom reports and measures of Neuroticism in males Data from 347 adult women in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging replicate this finding for total physical complaints and for most body systems However, analyses of mortality in the literature and in the present article show no influence of Neuroticism, suggesting that symptom reporting may be biased by Neuroticism‐related styles of perceiving and reporting physiological experiences Researchers in this area are urged to employ objective measures of medical status, and to be alert to possible biases of self‐selection and selective perception in interpreting associations between Neuroticism and disease

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)299-316
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Personality
Volume55
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1987
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bites and Stings
Expressed Emotion
Baltimore
Anger
Longitudinal Studies
Anxiety
Research Personnel
Depression
Mortality
Neuroticism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Neuroticism, Somatic Complaints, and Disease : Is the Bark Worse than the Bite? / Costa, Paul; McCrae, Robert R.

In: Journal of Personality, Vol. 55, No. 2, 1987, p. 299-316.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1073b58f236b4029840a474ffcde20d8,
title = "Neuroticism, Somatic Complaints, and Disease: Is the Bark Worse than the Bite?",
abstract = "ABSTRACT Perhaps because negative emotions are frequently expressed in physiological reactions, psychosomatic theories have often identified Neuroticism and its component traits (including anxiety, anger, and depression) as causal influences on the development of disease These views are apparently supported by correlations between physical symptom reports and measures of Neuroticism in males Data from 347 adult women in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging replicate this finding for total physical complaints and for most body systems However, analyses of mortality in the literature and in the present article show no influence of Neuroticism, suggesting that symptom reporting may be biased by Neuroticism‐related styles of perceiving and reporting physiological experiences Researchers in this area are urged to employ objective measures of medical status, and to be alert to possible biases of self‐selection and selective perception in interpreting associations between Neuroticism and disease",
author = "Paul Costa and McCrae, {Robert R.}",
year = "1987",
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00438.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "55",
pages = "299--316",
journal = "Journal of Personality",
issn = "0022-3506",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neuroticism, Somatic Complaints, and Disease

T2 - Is the Bark Worse than the Bite?

AU - Costa, Paul

AU - McCrae, Robert R.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - ABSTRACT Perhaps because negative emotions are frequently expressed in physiological reactions, psychosomatic theories have often identified Neuroticism and its component traits (including anxiety, anger, and depression) as causal influences on the development of disease These views are apparently supported by correlations between physical symptom reports and measures of Neuroticism in males Data from 347 adult women in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging replicate this finding for total physical complaints and for most body systems However, analyses of mortality in the literature and in the present article show no influence of Neuroticism, suggesting that symptom reporting may be biased by Neuroticism‐related styles of perceiving and reporting physiological experiences Researchers in this area are urged to employ objective measures of medical status, and to be alert to possible biases of self‐selection and selective perception in interpreting associations between Neuroticism and disease

AB - ABSTRACT Perhaps because negative emotions are frequently expressed in physiological reactions, psychosomatic theories have often identified Neuroticism and its component traits (including anxiety, anger, and depression) as causal influences on the development of disease These views are apparently supported by correlations between physical symptom reports and measures of Neuroticism in males Data from 347 adult women in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging replicate this finding for total physical complaints and for most body systems However, analyses of mortality in the literature and in the present article show no influence of Neuroticism, suggesting that symptom reporting may be biased by Neuroticism‐related styles of perceiving and reporting physiological experiences Researchers in this area are urged to employ objective measures of medical status, and to be alert to possible biases of self‐selection and selective perception in interpreting associations between Neuroticism and disease

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023354366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023354366&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00438.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00438.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 3612472

AN - SCOPUS:0023354366

VL - 55

SP - 299

EP - 316

JO - Journal of Personality

JF - Journal of Personality

SN - 0022-3506

IS - 2

ER -