Neuromonitoring in endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy

Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Hoon Yub Kim, Che Wei Wu, Matteo Lavazza, Gabriele Materazzi, Celestino Pio Lombardi, Angkoon Anuwong, Ralph P. Tufano

Research output: Research - peer-reviewReview article

Abstract

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has proven effective for intraoperative verification of RLN function in the conventional thyroid surgery. However, no studies have performed a systematic evidence-based assessment of this novel health technology in endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy. Evidence-based criteria were used in a systematic review of relevant literature for years 2000–2015. Four electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Cochrane and EMBASE) were used to retrieve relevant reports published from January 1, 2000 to September 1, 2016. The search terms included “endoscopic thyroidectomy”, “robotic thyroidectomy”, “IONM”, “continuous IONM (CIONM)”, “neural monitoring”, “recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring”, and “superior laryngeal monitoring”. The following data were retrieved from eligible studies of patients undergoing endoscopic or robotic thyroidectomy: objective of study, design and setting of study, population, intervention examined, quality of data, follow-up and dropout rate, risk of bias, and outcomes assessed. Of 160 studies retrieved, only 9 (5%) studies used IONM. Eight studies reported 522 nerve at risk (NAR) with IONM. Only three were prospective randomized studies. Reports of IONM endoscopic and robotic procedures included their use for re-surgery and use in both benign and malignant cases. None of the IONM endoscopic procedures involved bilateral palsy. Two studies reported the use of a staged strategy. The rates of recurrent laryngeal palsy were 0–3.6% for transient and 0–0.4% for permanent. Only 30% of the studies performed vagus nerve stimulation, and only 25% performed superior laryngeal nerve monitoring. In addition to the use of IONM as an assistive technology for navigating the anatomy in challenging procedures such as endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy, IONM has potential use as a routine adjunct to the conventional video-assisted nerve identification in thyroidectomy.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages171-179
Number of pages9
JournalUpdates in Surgery
Volume69
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Thyroidectomy
Robotics
Paralysis
Laryngeal Nerves
Vagus Nerve Stimulation
Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve
Self-Help Devices
Biomedical Technology Assessment
MEDLINE
Anatomy
Thyroid Gland
Databases
Prospective Studies
Population
Data Accuracy

Keywords

  • Endoscopic thyroidectomy
  • Neural monitoring
  • Recurrent laryngeal nerve
  • Robotic thyroidectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Dionigi, G., Kim, H. Y., Wu, C. W., Lavazza, M., Materazzi, G., Lombardi, C. P., ... Tufano, R. P. (2017). Neuromonitoring in endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy. Updates in Surgery, 69(2), 171-179. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-017-0442-z

Neuromonitoring in endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy. / Dionigi, Gianlorenzo; Kim, Hoon Yub; Wu, Che Wei; Lavazza, Matteo; Materazzi, Gabriele; Lombardi, Celestino Pio; Anuwong, Angkoon; Tufano, Ralph P.

In: Updates in Surgery, Vol. 69, No. 2, 01.06.2017, p. 171-179.

Research output: Research - peer-reviewReview article

Dionigi, G, Kim, HY, Wu, CW, Lavazza, M, Materazzi, G, Lombardi, CP, Anuwong, A & Tufano, RP 2017, 'Neuromonitoring in endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy' Updates in Surgery, vol 69, no. 2, pp. 171-179. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-017-0442-z
Dionigi G, Kim HY, Wu CW, Lavazza M, Materazzi G, Lombardi CP et al. Neuromonitoring in endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy. Updates in Surgery. 2017 Jun 1;69(2):171-179. Available from, DOI: 10.1007/s13304-017-0442-z
Dionigi, Gianlorenzo ; Kim, Hoon Yub ; Wu, Che Wei ; Lavazza, Matteo ; Materazzi, Gabriele ; Lombardi, Celestino Pio ; Anuwong, Angkoon ; Tufano, Ralph P./ Neuromonitoring in endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy. In: Updates in Surgery. 2017 ; Vol. 69, No. 2. pp. 171-179
@article{754f7fb916e44f0caafdf3bceeacfffa,
title = "Neuromonitoring in endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy",
abstract = "Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has proven effective for intraoperative verification of RLN function in the conventional thyroid surgery. However, no studies have performed a systematic evidence-based assessment of this novel health technology in endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy. Evidence-based criteria were used in a systematic review of relevant literature for years 2000–2015. Four electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Cochrane and EMBASE) were used to retrieve relevant reports published from January 1, 2000 to September 1, 2016. The search terms included “endoscopic thyroidectomy”, “robotic thyroidectomy”, “IONM”, “continuous IONM (CIONM)”, “neural monitoring”, “recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring”, and “superior laryngeal monitoring”. The following data were retrieved from eligible studies of patients undergoing endoscopic or robotic thyroidectomy: objective of study, design and setting of study, population, intervention examined, quality of data, follow-up and dropout rate, risk of bias, and outcomes assessed. Of 160 studies retrieved, only 9 (5%) studies used IONM. Eight studies reported 522 nerve at risk (NAR) with IONM. Only three were prospective randomized studies. Reports of IONM endoscopic and robotic procedures included their use for re-surgery and use in both benign and malignant cases. None of the IONM endoscopic procedures involved bilateral palsy. Two studies reported the use of a staged strategy. The rates of recurrent laryngeal palsy were 0–3.6% for transient and 0–0.4% for permanent. Only 30% of the studies performed vagus nerve stimulation, and only 25% performed superior laryngeal nerve monitoring. In addition to the use of IONM as an assistive technology for navigating the anatomy in challenging procedures such as endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy, IONM has potential use as a routine adjunct to the conventional video-assisted nerve identification in thyroidectomy.",
keywords = "Endoscopic thyroidectomy, Neural monitoring, Recurrent laryngeal nerve, Robotic thyroidectomy",
author = "Gianlorenzo Dionigi and Kim, {Hoon Yub} and Wu, {Che Wei} and Matteo Lavazza and Gabriele Materazzi and Lombardi, {Celestino Pio} and Angkoon Anuwong and Tufano, {Ralph P.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1007/s13304-017-0442-z",
volume = "69",
pages = "171--179",
journal = "Updates in Surgery",
issn = "2038-131X",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag Italia",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neuromonitoring in endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy

AU - Dionigi,Gianlorenzo

AU - Kim,Hoon Yub

AU - Wu,Che Wei

AU - Lavazza,Matteo

AU - Materazzi,Gabriele

AU - Lombardi,Celestino Pio

AU - Anuwong,Angkoon

AU - Tufano,Ralph P.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has proven effective for intraoperative verification of RLN function in the conventional thyroid surgery. However, no studies have performed a systematic evidence-based assessment of this novel health technology in endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy. Evidence-based criteria were used in a systematic review of relevant literature for years 2000–2015. Four electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Cochrane and EMBASE) were used to retrieve relevant reports published from January 1, 2000 to September 1, 2016. The search terms included “endoscopic thyroidectomy”, “robotic thyroidectomy”, “IONM”, “continuous IONM (CIONM)”, “neural monitoring”, “recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring”, and “superior laryngeal monitoring”. The following data were retrieved from eligible studies of patients undergoing endoscopic or robotic thyroidectomy: objective of study, design and setting of study, population, intervention examined, quality of data, follow-up and dropout rate, risk of bias, and outcomes assessed. Of 160 studies retrieved, only 9 (5%) studies used IONM. Eight studies reported 522 nerve at risk (NAR) with IONM. Only three were prospective randomized studies. Reports of IONM endoscopic and robotic procedures included their use for re-surgery and use in both benign and malignant cases. None of the IONM endoscopic procedures involved bilateral palsy. Two studies reported the use of a staged strategy. The rates of recurrent laryngeal palsy were 0–3.6% for transient and 0–0.4% for permanent. Only 30% of the studies performed vagus nerve stimulation, and only 25% performed superior laryngeal nerve monitoring. In addition to the use of IONM as an assistive technology for navigating the anatomy in challenging procedures such as endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy, IONM has potential use as a routine adjunct to the conventional video-assisted nerve identification in thyroidectomy.

AB - Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has proven effective for intraoperative verification of RLN function in the conventional thyroid surgery. However, no studies have performed a systematic evidence-based assessment of this novel health technology in endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy. Evidence-based criteria were used in a systematic review of relevant literature for years 2000–2015. Four electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Cochrane and EMBASE) were used to retrieve relevant reports published from January 1, 2000 to September 1, 2016. The search terms included “endoscopic thyroidectomy”, “robotic thyroidectomy”, “IONM”, “continuous IONM (CIONM)”, “neural monitoring”, “recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring”, and “superior laryngeal monitoring”. The following data were retrieved from eligible studies of patients undergoing endoscopic or robotic thyroidectomy: objective of study, design and setting of study, population, intervention examined, quality of data, follow-up and dropout rate, risk of bias, and outcomes assessed. Of 160 studies retrieved, only 9 (5%) studies used IONM. Eight studies reported 522 nerve at risk (NAR) with IONM. Only three were prospective randomized studies. Reports of IONM endoscopic and robotic procedures included their use for re-surgery and use in both benign and malignant cases. None of the IONM endoscopic procedures involved bilateral palsy. Two studies reported the use of a staged strategy. The rates of recurrent laryngeal palsy were 0–3.6% for transient and 0–0.4% for permanent. Only 30% of the studies performed vagus nerve stimulation, and only 25% performed superior laryngeal nerve monitoring. In addition to the use of IONM as an assistive technology for navigating the anatomy in challenging procedures such as endoscopic and robotic thyroidectomy, IONM has potential use as a routine adjunct to the conventional video-assisted nerve identification in thyroidectomy.

KW - Endoscopic thyroidectomy

KW - Neural monitoring

KW - Recurrent laryngeal nerve

KW - Robotic thyroidectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021689654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021689654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13304-017-0442-z

DO - 10.1007/s13304-017-0442-z

M3 - Review article

VL - 69

SP - 171

EP - 179

JO - Updates in Surgery

T2 - Updates in Surgery

JF - Updates in Surgery

SN - 2038-131X

IS - 2

ER -