Neurocognitive functioning in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder and unaffected relatives

A review of the literature

Stephanie A. Cardenas, Layla Kassem, Melissa A. Brotman, Ellen Leibenluft, Francis J. McMahon

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Background Neurocognitive deficits are present in bipolar disorder (BD) patients and their unaffected (nonbipolar) relatives, but it is not clear which domains are most often impaired and the extent of the impairment resulting from shared genetic factors. In this literature review, we address these issues and identify specific neurocognitive tasks most sensitive to cognitive deficits in patients and unaffected relatives. Method We conducted a systematic review in Web of Science, PubMed/Medline and PsycINFO databases. Results Fifty-one articles assessing cognitive functioning in BD patients (23 studies) and unaffected relatives (28 studies) were examined. Patients and, less so, relatives show impairments in attention, processing speed, verbal learning/memory, and verbal fluency. Conclusion Studies were more likely to find impairment in patients than relatives, suggesting that some neurocognitive deficits may be a result of the illness itself and/or its treatment. However, small sample sizes, differences among relatives studied (e.g., relatedness, diagnostic status, age), and differences in assessment instruments may contribute to inconsistencies in reported neurocognitive performance among relatives. Additional studies addressing these issues are needed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)193-215
Number of pages23
JournalNeuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
Volume69
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bipolar Disorder
Verbal Learning
PubMed
Sample Size
Databases

Keywords

  • At-risk
  • Bipolar disorder
  • Cognition
  • Neuropsychology
  • Relatives
  • Review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Neurocognitive functioning in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder and unaffected relatives : A review of the literature. / Cardenas, Stephanie A.; Kassem, Layla; Brotman, Melissa A.; Leibenluft, Ellen; McMahon, Francis J.

In: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 69, 01.10.2016, p. 193-215.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Cardenas, Stephanie A. ; Kassem, Layla ; Brotman, Melissa A. ; Leibenluft, Ellen ; McMahon, Francis J. / Neurocognitive functioning in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder and unaffected relatives : A review of the literature. In: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2016 ; Vol. 69. pp. 193-215.
@article{b2d76c6a6d03422d8b1f643c1ffe0871,
title = "Neurocognitive functioning in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder and unaffected relatives: A review of the literature",
abstract = "Background Neurocognitive deficits are present in bipolar disorder (BD) patients and their unaffected (nonbipolar) relatives, but it is not clear which domains are most often impaired and the extent of the impairment resulting from shared genetic factors. In this literature review, we address these issues and identify specific neurocognitive tasks most sensitive to cognitive deficits in patients and unaffected relatives. Method We conducted a systematic review in Web of Science, PubMed/Medline and PsycINFO databases. Results Fifty-one articles assessing cognitive functioning in BD patients (23 studies) and unaffected relatives (28 studies) were examined. Patients and, less so, relatives show impairments in attention, processing speed, verbal learning/memory, and verbal fluency. Conclusion Studies were more likely to find impairment in patients than relatives, suggesting that some neurocognitive deficits may be a result of the illness itself and/or its treatment. However, small sample sizes, differences among relatives studied (e.g., relatedness, diagnostic status, age), and differences in assessment instruments may contribute to inconsistencies in reported neurocognitive performance among relatives. Additional studies addressing these issues are needed.",
keywords = "At-risk, Bipolar disorder, Cognition, Neuropsychology, Relatives, Review",
author = "Cardenas, {Stephanie A.} and Layla Kassem and Brotman, {Melissa A.} and Ellen Leibenluft and McMahon, {Francis J.}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "69",
pages = "193--215",
journal = "Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews",
issn = "0149-7634",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neurocognitive functioning in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder and unaffected relatives

T2 - A review of the literature

AU - Cardenas, Stephanie A.

AU - Kassem, Layla

AU - Brotman, Melissa A.

AU - Leibenluft, Ellen

AU - McMahon, Francis J.

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - Background Neurocognitive deficits are present in bipolar disorder (BD) patients and their unaffected (nonbipolar) relatives, but it is not clear which domains are most often impaired and the extent of the impairment resulting from shared genetic factors. In this literature review, we address these issues and identify specific neurocognitive tasks most sensitive to cognitive deficits in patients and unaffected relatives. Method We conducted a systematic review in Web of Science, PubMed/Medline and PsycINFO databases. Results Fifty-one articles assessing cognitive functioning in BD patients (23 studies) and unaffected relatives (28 studies) were examined. Patients and, less so, relatives show impairments in attention, processing speed, verbal learning/memory, and verbal fluency. Conclusion Studies were more likely to find impairment in patients than relatives, suggesting that some neurocognitive deficits may be a result of the illness itself and/or its treatment. However, small sample sizes, differences among relatives studied (e.g., relatedness, diagnostic status, age), and differences in assessment instruments may contribute to inconsistencies in reported neurocognitive performance among relatives. Additional studies addressing these issues are needed.

AB - Background Neurocognitive deficits are present in bipolar disorder (BD) patients and their unaffected (nonbipolar) relatives, but it is not clear which domains are most often impaired and the extent of the impairment resulting from shared genetic factors. In this literature review, we address these issues and identify specific neurocognitive tasks most sensitive to cognitive deficits in patients and unaffected relatives. Method We conducted a systematic review in Web of Science, PubMed/Medline and PsycINFO databases. Results Fifty-one articles assessing cognitive functioning in BD patients (23 studies) and unaffected relatives (28 studies) were examined. Patients and, less so, relatives show impairments in attention, processing speed, verbal learning/memory, and verbal fluency. Conclusion Studies were more likely to find impairment in patients than relatives, suggesting that some neurocognitive deficits may be a result of the illness itself and/or its treatment. However, small sample sizes, differences among relatives studied (e.g., relatedness, diagnostic status, age), and differences in assessment instruments may contribute to inconsistencies in reported neurocognitive performance among relatives. Additional studies addressing these issues are needed.

KW - At-risk

KW - Bipolar disorder

KW - Cognition

KW - Neuropsychology

KW - Relatives

KW - Review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981549546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981549546&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.08.002

M3 - Review article

VL - 69

SP - 193

EP - 215

JO - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

JF - Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews

SN - 0149-7634

ER -