Neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive functioning in prodromal Huntington disease

Deborah L. Harrington, Dawei Liu, Megan M. Smith, James A. Mills, Jeffrey D. Long, Elizabeth H. Aylward, Jane S. Paulsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: The brain mechanisms of cognitive impairment in prodromal Huntington disease (prHD) are not well understood. Although striatal atrophy correlates with some cognitive abilities, few studies of prHD have investigated whether cortical gray matter morphometry correlates in a regionally specific manner with functioning in different cognitive domains. This knowledge would inform the selection of cognitive measures for clinical trials that would be most sensitive to the target of a treatment intervention. Method: In this study, random forest analysis was used to identify neuroanatomical correlates of functioning in five cognitive domains including attention and information processing speed, working memory, verbal learning and memory, negative emotion recognition, and temporal processing. Participants included 325 prHD individuals with varying levels of disease progression and 119 gene-negative controls with a family history of HD. In intermediate analyses, we identified brain regions that showed significant differences between the prHD and the control groups in cortical thickness and striatal volume. Brain morphometry in these regions was then correlated with cognitive functioning in each of the domains in the prHD group using random forest methods. We hypothesized that different regional patterns of brain morphometry would be associated with performances in distinct cognitive domains. Results: The results showed that performances in different cognitive domains that are vulnerable to decline in prHD were correlated with regionally specific patterns of cortical and striatal morphometry. Putamen and/or caudate volumes were top-ranked correlates of performance across all cognitive domains, as was cortical thickness in regions related to the processing demands of each domain. Conclusions: The results underscore the importance of identifying structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) markers of functioning in different cognitive domains, as their relative sensitivity depends on the extent to which processing is called upon by different brain networks. The findings have implications for identifying neuroimaging and cognitive outcome measures for use in clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)29-40
Number of pages12
JournalBrain and Behavior
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Huntington Disease
Corpus Striatum
Brain
Clinical Trials
Verbal Learning
Aptitude
Putamen
Automatic Data Processing
Short-Term Memory
Neuroimaging
Atrophy
Disease Progression
Emotions
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Control Groups
Genes

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Prodromal Huntington disease

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Harrington, D. L., Liu, D., Smith, M. M., Mills, J. A., Long, J. D., Aylward, E. H., & Paulsen, J. S. (2014). Neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive functioning in prodromal Huntington disease. Brain and Behavior, 4(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.185

Neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive functioning in prodromal Huntington disease. / Harrington, Deborah L.; Liu, Dawei; Smith, Megan M.; Mills, James A.; Long, Jeffrey D.; Aylward, Elizabeth H.; Paulsen, Jane S.

In: Brain and Behavior, Vol. 4, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 29-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Harrington, DL, Liu, D, Smith, MM, Mills, JA, Long, JD, Aylward, EH & Paulsen, JS 2014, 'Neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive functioning in prodromal Huntington disease', Brain and Behavior, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.185
Harrington, Deborah L. ; Liu, Dawei ; Smith, Megan M. ; Mills, James A. ; Long, Jeffrey D. ; Aylward, Elizabeth H. ; Paulsen, Jane S. / Neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive functioning in prodromal Huntington disease. In: Brain and Behavior. 2014 ; Vol. 4, No. 1. pp. 29-40.
@article{86a30b61eea44ec7b6e997e4aedc06d8,
title = "Neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive functioning in prodromal Huntington disease",
abstract = "Introduction: The brain mechanisms of cognitive impairment in prodromal Huntington disease (prHD) are not well understood. Although striatal atrophy correlates with some cognitive abilities, few studies of prHD have investigated whether cortical gray matter morphometry correlates in a regionally specific manner with functioning in different cognitive domains. This knowledge would inform the selection of cognitive measures for clinical trials that would be most sensitive to the target of a treatment intervention. Method: In this study, random forest analysis was used to identify neuroanatomical correlates of functioning in five cognitive domains including attention and information processing speed, working memory, verbal learning and memory, negative emotion recognition, and temporal processing. Participants included 325 prHD individuals with varying levels of disease progression and 119 gene-negative controls with a family history of HD. In intermediate analyses, we identified brain regions that showed significant differences between the prHD and the control groups in cortical thickness and striatal volume. Brain morphometry in these regions was then correlated with cognitive functioning in each of the domains in the prHD group using random forest methods. We hypothesized that different regional patterns of brain morphometry would be associated with performances in distinct cognitive domains. Results: The results showed that performances in different cognitive domains that are vulnerable to decline in prHD were correlated with regionally specific patterns of cortical and striatal morphometry. Putamen and/or caudate volumes were top-ranked correlates of performance across all cognitive domains, as was cortical thickness in regions related to the processing demands of each domain. Conclusions: The results underscore the importance of identifying structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) markers of functioning in different cognitive domains, as their relative sensitivity depends on the extent to which processing is called upon by different brain networks. The findings have implications for identifying neuroimaging and cognitive outcome measures for use in clinical trials.",
keywords = "Cognition, Magnetic resonance imaging, Prodromal Huntington disease",
author = "Harrington, {Deborah L.} and Dawei Liu and Smith, {Megan M.} and Mills, {James A.} and Long, {Jeffrey D.} and Aylward, {Elizabeth H.} and Paulsen, {Jane S.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1002/brb3.185",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4",
pages = "29--40",
journal = "Brain and Behavior",
issn = "2157-9032",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive functioning in prodromal Huntington disease

AU - Harrington, Deborah L.

AU - Liu, Dawei

AU - Smith, Megan M.

AU - Mills, James A.

AU - Long, Jeffrey D.

AU - Aylward, Elizabeth H.

AU - Paulsen, Jane S.

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Introduction: The brain mechanisms of cognitive impairment in prodromal Huntington disease (prHD) are not well understood. Although striatal atrophy correlates with some cognitive abilities, few studies of prHD have investigated whether cortical gray matter morphometry correlates in a regionally specific manner with functioning in different cognitive domains. This knowledge would inform the selection of cognitive measures for clinical trials that would be most sensitive to the target of a treatment intervention. Method: In this study, random forest analysis was used to identify neuroanatomical correlates of functioning in five cognitive domains including attention and information processing speed, working memory, verbal learning and memory, negative emotion recognition, and temporal processing. Participants included 325 prHD individuals with varying levels of disease progression and 119 gene-negative controls with a family history of HD. In intermediate analyses, we identified brain regions that showed significant differences between the prHD and the control groups in cortical thickness and striatal volume. Brain morphometry in these regions was then correlated with cognitive functioning in each of the domains in the prHD group using random forest methods. We hypothesized that different regional patterns of brain morphometry would be associated with performances in distinct cognitive domains. Results: The results showed that performances in different cognitive domains that are vulnerable to decline in prHD were correlated with regionally specific patterns of cortical and striatal morphometry. Putamen and/or caudate volumes were top-ranked correlates of performance across all cognitive domains, as was cortical thickness in regions related to the processing demands of each domain. Conclusions: The results underscore the importance of identifying structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) markers of functioning in different cognitive domains, as their relative sensitivity depends on the extent to which processing is called upon by different brain networks. The findings have implications for identifying neuroimaging and cognitive outcome measures for use in clinical trials.

AB - Introduction: The brain mechanisms of cognitive impairment in prodromal Huntington disease (prHD) are not well understood. Although striatal atrophy correlates with some cognitive abilities, few studies of prHD have investigated whether cortical gray matter morphometry correlates in a regionally specific manner with functioning in different cognitive domains. This knowledge would inform the selection of cognitive measures for clinical trials that would be most sensitive to the target of a treatment intervention. Method: In this study, random forest analysis was used to identify neuroanatomical correlates of functioning in five cognitive domains including attention and information processing speed, working memory, verbal learning and memory, negative emotion recognition, and temporal processing. Participants included 325 prHD individuals with varying levels of disease progression and 119 gene-negative controls with a family history of HD. In intermediate analyses, we identified brain regions that showed significant differences between the prHD and the control groups in cortical thickness and striatal volume. Brain morphometry in these regions was then correlated with cognitive functioning in each of the domains in the prHD group using random forest methods. We hypothesized that different regional patterns of brain morphometry would be associated with performances in distinct cognitive domains. Results: The results showed that performances in different cognitive domains that are vulnerable to decline in prHD were correlated with regionally specific patterns of cortical and striatal morphometry. Putamen and/or caudate volumes were top-ranked correlates of performance across all cognitive domains, as was cortical thickness in regions related to the processing demands of each domain. Conclusions: The results underscore the importance of identifying structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) markers of functioning in different cognitive domains, as their relative sensitivity depends on the extent to which processing is called upon by different brain networks. The findings have implications for identifying neuroimaging and cognitive outcome measures for use in clinical trials.

KW - Cognition

KW - Magnetic resonance imaging

KW - Prodromal Huntington disease

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893516704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893516704&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/brb3.185

DO - 10.1002/brb3.185

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 29

EP - 40

JO - Brain and Behavior

JF - Brain and Behavior

SN - 2157-9032

IS - 1

ER -