Neural Correlates of Sensory Prediction Errors in Monkeys: Evidence for Internal Models of Voluntary Self-Motion in the Cerebellum

Kathleen Cullen, Jessica X. Brooks

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

During self-motion, the vestibular system makes essential contributions to postural stability and self-motion perception. To ensure accurate perception and motor control, it is critical to distinguish between vestibular sensory inputs that are the result of externally applied motion (exafference) and that are the result of our own actions (reafference). Indeed, although the vestibular sensors encode vestibular afference and reafference with equal fidelity, neurons at the first central stage of sensory processing selectively encode vestibular exafference. The mechanism underlying this reafferent suppression compares the brain’s motor-based expectation of sensory feedback with the actual sensory consequences of voluntary self-motion, effectively computing the sensory prediction error (i.e., exafference). It is generally thought that sensory prediction errors are computed in the cerebellum, yet it has been challenging to explicitly demonstrate this. We have recently addressed this question and found that deep cerebellar nuclei neurons explicitly encode sensory prediction errors during self-motion. Importantly, in everyday life, sensory prediction errors occur in response to changes in the effector or world (muscle strength, load, etc.), as well as in response to externally applied sensory stimulation. Accordingly, we hypothesize that altering the relationship between motor commands and the actual movement parameters will result in the updating in the cerebellum-based computation of exafference. If our hypothesis is correct, under these conditions, neuronal responses should initially be increased—consistent with a sudden increase in the sensory prediction error. Then, over time, as the internal model is updated, response modulation should decrease in parallel with a reduction in sensory prediction error, until vestibular reafference is again suppressed. The finding that the internal model predicting the sensory consequences of motor commands adapts for new relationships would have important implications for understanding how responses to passive stimulation endure despite the cerebellum’s ability to learn new relationships between motor commands and sensory feedback.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)31-34
Number of pages4
JournalCerebellum
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cerebellum
Haplorhini
Sensory Feedback
Motion Perception
Neurons
Cerebellar Nuclei
Aptitude
Muscle Strength
Brain

Keywords

  • Cerebellum
  • Corollary discharge
  • Efference copy
  • Internal models
  • Motor learning
  • Primate
  • Vestibular

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Neural Correlates of Sensory Prediction Errors in Monkeys : Evidence for Internal Models of Voluntary Self-Motion in the Cerebellum. / Cullen, Kathleen; Brooks, Jessica X.

In: Cerebellum, Vol. 14, No. 1, 2015, p. 31-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{cf6ab37fc728488d9b3dad7eabf7fdc3,
title = "Neural Correlates of Sensory Prediction Errors in Monkeys: Evidence for Internal Models of Voluntary Self-Motion in the Cerebellum",
abstract = "During self-motion, the vestibular system makes essential contributions to postural stability and self-motion perception. To ensure accurate perception and motor control, it is critical to distinguish between vestibular sensory inputs that are the result of externally applied motion (exafference) and that are the result of our own actions (reafference). Indeed, although the vestibular sensors encode vestibular afference and reafference with equal fidelity, neurons at the first central stage of sensory processing selectively encode vestibular exafference. The mechanism underlying this reafferent suppression compares the brain’s motor-based expectation of sensory feedback with the actual sensory consequences of voluntary self-motion, effectively computing the sensory prediction error (i.e., exafference). It is generally thought that sensory prediction errors are computed in the cerebellum, yet it has been challenging to explicitly demonstrate this. We have recently addressed this question and found that deep cerebellar nuclei neurons explicitly encode sensory prediction errors during self-motion. Importantly, in everyday life, sensory prediction errors occur in response to changes in the effector or world (muscle strength, load, etc.), as well as in response to externally applied sensory stimulation. Accordingly, we hypothesize that altering the relationship between motor commands and the actual movement parameters will result in the updating in the cerebellum-based computation of exafference. If our hypothesis is correct, under these conditions, neuronal responses should initially be increased—consistent with a sudden increase in the sensory prediction error. Then, over time, as the internal model is updated, response modulation should decrease in parallel with a reduction in sensory prediction error, until vestibular reafference is again suppressed. The finding that the internal model predicting the sensory consequences of motor commands adapts for new relationships would have important implications for understanding how responses to passive stimulation endure despite the cerebellum’s ability to learn new relationships between motor commands and sensory feedback.",
keywords = "Cerebellum, Corollary discharge, Efference copy, Internal models, Motor learning, Primate, Vestibular",
author = "Kathleen Cullen and Brooks, {Jessica X.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1007/s12311-014-0608-x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "31--34",
journal = "Cerebellum",
issn = "1473-4222",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neural Correlates of Sensory Prediction Errors in Monkeys

T2 - Evidence for Internal Models of Voluntary Self-Motion in the Cerebellum

AU - Cullen, Kathleen

AU - Brooks, Jessica X.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - During self-motion, the vestibular system makes essential contributions to postural stability and self-motion perception. To ensure accurate perception and motor control, it is critical to distinguish between vestibular sensory inputs that are the result of externally applied motion (exafference) and that are the result of our own actions (reafference). Indeed, although the vestibular sensors encode vestibular afference and reafference with equal fidelity, neurons at the first central stage of sensory processing selectively encode vestibular exafference. The mechanism underlying this reafferent suppression compares the brain’s motor-based expectation of sensory feedback with the actual sensory consequences of voluntary self-motion, effectively computing the sensory prediction error (i.e., exafference). It is generally thought that sensory prediction errors are computed in the cerebellum, yet it has been challenging to explicitly demonstrate this. We have recently addressed this question and found that deep cerebellar nuclei neurons explicitly encode sensory prediction errors during self-motion. Importantly, in everyday life, sensory prediction errors occur in response to changes in the effector or world (muscle strength, load, etc.), as well as in response to externally applied sensory stimulation. Accordingly, we hypothesize that altering the relationship between motor commands and the actual movement parameters will result in the updating in the cerebellum-based computation of exafference. If our hypothesis is correct, under these conditions, neuronal responses should initially be increased—consistent with a sudden increase in the sensory prediction error. Then, over time, as the internal model is updated, response modulation should decrease in parallel with a reduction in sensory prediction error, until vestibular reafference is again suppressed. The finding that the internal model predicting the sensory consequences of motor commands adapts for new relationships would have important implications for understanding how responses to passive stimulation endure despite the cerebellum’s ability to learn new relationships between motor commands and sensory feedback.

AB - During self-motion, the vestibular system makes essential contributions to postural stability and self-motion perception. To ensure accurate perception and motor control, it is critical to distinguish between vestibular sensory inputs that are the result of externally applied motion (exafference) and that are the result of our own actions (reafference). Indeed, although the vestibular sensors encode vestibular afference and reafference with equal fidelity, neurons at the first central stage of sensory processing selectively encode vestibular exafference. The mechanism underlying this reafferent suppression compares the brain’s motor-based expectation of sensory feedback with the actual sensory consequences of voluntary self-motion, effectively computing the sensory prediction error (i.e., exafference). It is generally thought that sensory prediction errors are computed in the cerebellum, yet it has been challenging to explicitly demonstrate this. We have recently addressed this question and found that deep cerebellar nuclei neurons explicitly encode sensory prediction errors during self-motion. Importantly, in everyday life, sensory prediction errors occur in response to changes in the effector or world (muscle strength, load, etc.), as well as in response to externally applied sensory stimulation. Accordingly, we hypothesize that altering the relationship between motor commands and the actual movement parameters will result in the updating in the cerebellum-based computation of exafference. If our hypothesis is correct, under these conditions, neuronal responses should initially be increased—consistent with a sudden increase in the sensory prediction error. Then, over time, as the internal model is updated, response modulation should decrease in parallel with a reduction in sensory prediction error, until vestibular reafference is again suppressed. The finding that the internal model predicting the sensory consequences of motor commands adapts for new relationships would have important implications for understanding how responses to passive stimulation endure despite the cerebellum’s ability to learn new relationships between motor commands and sensory feedback.

KW - Cerebellum

KW - Corollary discharge

KW - Efference copy

KW - Internal models

KW - Motor learning

KW - Primate

KW - Vestibular

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925495915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925495915&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s12311-014-0608-x

DO - 10.1007/s12311-014-0608-x

M3 - Review article

C2 - 25287644

AN - SCOPUS:84925495915

VL - 14

SP - 31

EP - 34

JO - Cerebellum

JF - Cerebellum

SN - 1473-4222

IS - 1

ER -