National quality measures for breast centers (NQMBC): A robust quality tool: Breast center quality measures

C. S. Kaufman, Lillie Shockney, B. Rabinowitz, C. Coleman, C. Beard, J. Landercasper, J. B. Askew, D. Wiggins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: Measuring and improving quality of care is of primary interest to patients, clinicians, and payers. The National Consortium of Breast Centers (NCBC) has created a unique program to assess and compare the quality of interdisciplinary breast care provided by breast centers across the country. Methods: In 2005 the NCBC Quality Initiative Committee formulated their initial series of 37 measurements of breast center quality, eventually called the National Quality Measures for Breast Centers (NQMBC). Measures were derived from published literature as well as expert opinion. An interactive website was created to enter measurement data from individual breast centers and to provide customized comparison reports. Breast centers submit information using data they collect over a single month on consecutive patients. Centers can compare their results with centers of similar size and demographic or compare themselves to all centers who supplied answers for individual measures. New data may be submitted twice yearly. Serially submitted data allow centers to compare themselves over time. NQMBC random audits confirm accuracy of submitted data. Early results on several initial measures are reported here. Results: Over 200 centers are currently submitting data to the NQMBC via the Internet without charge. These measures provide insight regarding timeliness of care provided by radiologists, surgeons, and pathologists. Results are expressed as the mean average, as well as 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles for each metric. This sample of seven measures includes data from over 30,000 patients since 2005, representing a powerful database. In addition, comparison results are available every 6 months, recognizing that benchmarks may change over time. Conclusions: A real-time web-based quality improvement program facilitates breast center input, providing immediate comparisons with other centers and results serially over time. Data may be used by centers to recognize high-quality care they provide or to identify areas for quality improvement. Initial results demonstrate the power and potential of web-based tools for data collection and analysis from hundreds of centers who care for thousands of patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)377-385
Number of pages9
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume17
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2010

Fingerprint

Breast
Quality of Health Care
Quality Improvement
Information Centers
Benchmarking
Expert Testimony
Internet
Patient Care
Demography
Databases

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cite this

National quality measures for breast centers (NQMBC) : A robust quality tool: Breast center quality measures. / Kaufman, C. S.; Shockney, Lillie; Rabinowitz, B.; Coleman, C.; Beard, C.; Landercasper, J.; Askew, J. B.; Wiggins, D.

In: Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 17, No. 2, 01.02.2010, p. 377-385.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kaufman, CS, Shockney, L, Rabinowitz, B, Coleman, C, Beard, C, Landercasper, J, Askew, JB & Wiggins, D 2010, 'National quality measures for breast centers (NQMBC): A robust quality tool: Breast center quality measures', Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 377-385. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0729-5
Kaufman, C. S. ; Shockney, Lillie ; Rabinowitz, B. ; Coleman, C. ; Beard, C. ; Landercasper, J. ; Askew, J. B. ; Wiggins, D. / National quality measures for breast centers (NQMBC) : A robust quality tool: Breast center quality measures. In: Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2010 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 377-385.
@article{511c4bd46f814bf1a1013f2e69901c25,
title = "National quality measures for breast centers (NQMBC): A robust quality tool: Breast center quality measures",
abstract = "Introduction: Measuring and improving quality of care is of primary interest to patients, clinicians, and payers. The National Consortium of Breast Centers (NCBC) has created a unique program to assess and compare the quality of interdisciplinary breast care provided by breast centers across the country. Methods: In 2005 the NCBC Quality Initiative Committee formulated their initial series of 37 measurements of breast center quality, eventually called the National Quality Measures for Breast Centers (NQMBC). Measures were derived from published literature as well as expert opinion. An interactive website was created to enter measurement data from individual breast centers and to provide customized comparison reports. Breast centers submit information using data they collect over a single month on consecutive patients. Centers can compare their results with centers of similar size and demographic or compare themselves to all centers who supplied answers for individual measures. New data may be submitted twice yearly. Serially submitted data allow centers to compare themselves over time. NQMBC random audits confirm accuracy of submitted data. Early results on several initial measures are reported here. Results: Over 200 centers are currently submitting data to the NQMBC via the Internet without charge. These measures provide insight regarding timeliness of care provided by radiologists, surgeons, and pathologists. Results are expressed as the mean average, as well as 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles for each metric. This sample of seven measures includes data from over 30,000 patients since 2005, representing a powerful database. In addition, comparison results are available every 6 months, recognizing that benchmarks may change over time. Conclusions: A real-time web-based quality improvement program facilitates breast center input, providing immediate comparisons with other centers and results serially over time. Data may be used by centers to recognize high-quality care they provide or to identify areas for quality improvement. Initial results demonstrate the power and potential of web-based tools for data collection and analysis from hundreds of centers who care for thousands of patients.",
author = "Kaufman, {C. S.} and Lillie Shockney and B. Rabinowitz and C. Coleman and C. Beard and J. Landercasper and Askew, {J. B.} and D. Wiggins",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1245/s10434-009-0729-5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "377--385",
journal = "Annals of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "1068-9265",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - National quality measures for breast centers (NQMBC)

T2 - A robust quality tool: Breast center quality measures

AU - Kaufman, C. S.

AU - Shockney, Lillie

AU - Rabinowitz, B.

AU - Coleman, C.

AU - Beard, C.

AU - Landercasper, J.

AU - Askew, J. B.

AU - Wiggins, D.

PY - 2010/2/1

Y1 - 2010/2/1

N2 - Introduction: Measuring and improving quality of care is of primary interest to patients, clinicians, and payers. The National Consortium of Breast Centers (NCBC) has created a unique program to assess and compare the quality of interdisciplinary breast care provided by breast centers across the country. Methods: In 2005 the NCBC Quality Initiative Committee formulated their initial series of 37 measurements of breast center quality, eventually called the National Quality Measures for Breast Centers (NQMBC). Measures were derived from published literature as well as expert opinion. An interactive website was created to enter measurement data from individual breast centers and to provide customized comparison reports. Breast centers submit information using data they collect over a single month on consecutive patients. Centers can compare their results with centers of similar size and demographic or compare themselves to all centers who supplied answers for individual measures. New data may be submitted twice yearly. Serially submitted data allow centers to compare themselves over time. NQMBC random audits confirm accuracy of submitted data. Early results on several initial measures are reported here. Results: Over 200 centers are currently submitting data to the NQMBC via the Internet without charge. These measures provide insight regarding timeliness of care provided by radiologists, surgeons, and pathologists. Results are expressed as the mean average, as well as 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles for each metric. This sample of seven measures includes data from over 30,000 patients since 2005, representing a powerful database. In addition, comparison results are available every 6 months, recognizing that benchmarks may change over time. Conclusions: A real-time web-based quality improvement program facilitates breast center input, providing immediate comparisons with other centers and results serially over time. Data may be used by centers to recognize high-quality care they provide or to identify areas for quality improvement. Initial results demonstrate the power and potential of web-based tools for data collection and analysis from hundreds of centers who care for thousands of patients.

AB - Introduction: Measuring and improving quality of care is of primary interest to patients, clinicians, and payers. The National Consortium of Breast Centers (NCBC) has created a unique program to assess and compare the quality of interdisciplinary breast care provided by breast centers across the country. Methods: In 2005 the NCBC Quality Initiative Committee formulated their initial series of 37 measurements of breast center quality, eventually called the National Quality Measures for Breast Centers (NQMBC). Measures were derived from published literature as well as expert opinion. An interactive website was created to enter measurement data from individual breast centers and to provide customized comparison reports. Breast centers submit information using data they collect over a single month on consecutive patients. Centers can compare their results with centers of similar size and demographic or compare themselves to all centers who supplied answers for individual measures. New data may be submitted twice yearly. Serially submitted data allow centers to compare themselves over time. NQMBC random audits confirm accuracy of submitted data. Early results on several initial measures are reported here. Results: Over 200 centers are currently submitting data to the NQMBC via the Internet without charge. These measures provide insight regarding timeliness of care provided by radiologists, surgeons, and pathologists. Results are expressed as the mean average, as well as 25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles for each metric. This sample of seven measures includes data from over 30,000 patients since 2005, representing a powerful database. In addition, comparison results are available every 6 months, recognizing that benchmarks may change over time. Conclusions: A real-time web-based quality improvement program facilitates breast center input, providing immediate comparisons with other centers and results serially over time. Data may be used by centers to recognize high-quality care they provide or to identify areas for quality improvement. Initial results demonstrate the power and potential of web-based tools for data collection and analysis from hundreds of centers who care for thousands of patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77149138307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77149138307&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1245/s10434-009-0729-5

DO - 10.1245/s10434-009-0729-5

M3 - Article

C2 - 19834768

AN - SCOPUS:77149138307

VL - 17

SP - 377

EP - 385

JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology

JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology

SN - 1068-9265

IS - 2

ER -