National disparities in laparoscopic colorectal procedures for colon cancer

Monirah AlNasser, Eric B. Schneider, Susan L Gearhart, Elizabeth C. Wick, Sandy H Fang, Adil H. Haider, Jonathan Efron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction Racial disparity in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been cited as a potential cause for differences in mortality. This study compares the rates of laparoscopy according to race, insurance status, geographic location, and hospital size. Methods The 2009 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project: Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) database was queried to identify patients with the diagnosis of CRC by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to look at age, gender, insurance coverage, academic versus nonacademic affiliated institutions, rural versus urban settings, location, and proportional differences in laparoscopic procedures according to race. Results A total of 14,502 patients were identified; 4,691 (32.35 %) underwent laparoscopic colorectal procedures and 9,811 (67.65 %) underwent open procedures. The proportion of laparoscopic procedures did not differ significantly by race: Caucasian 32.4 %, African-American 30.04 %, Hispanic 33.99 %, and Asian-Pacific Islander 35.12 (P = 0.08). Among Caucasian and African-American patients, those covered by private insurers were more likely to undergo laparoscopic procedures compared to other insurance types (P ≤ 0.001). The odds of receiving laparoscopic procedure at teaching hospitals was 1.39 times greater than in nonteaching hospitals (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.29-1.48) and did not differ across race groups. Patients in urban hospitals demonstrated higher odds of laparoscopic surgery (2.24, 95 % CI 1.96-2.56) than in rural hospitals; this relationship was consistent within races. The odds of undergoing laparoscopic surgeries was lowest in the Midwest region (0.89, 95 % CI 0.81-0.97) but higher in the Southern region (1.14, 95 % CI 1.06-1.22) compared with the other regions. Conclusions Nearly one-third of all CRC surgeries are laparoscopic. Race does not appear to play a significant role in the selection of a laparoscopic CRC operation. However, there are significant differences in the selection of laparoscopy for CRC patients based on insurance status, geographic location, and hospital type.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-57
Number of pages9
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Colonic Neoplasms
Colorectal Neoplasms
Laparoscopy
Insurance Coverage
International Classification of Diseases
Confidence Intervals
Geographic Locations
African Americans
Health Facility Size
Rural Hospitals
Insurance Carriers
Colorectal Surgery
Urban Hospitals
Insurance
Hispanic Americans
Teaching Hospitals
Health Care Costs
Inpatients
Logistic Models
Databases

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer
  • Race
  • Surgical technique

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

National disparities in laparoscopic colorectal procedures for colon cancer. / AlNasser, Monirah; Schneider, Eric B.; Gearhart, Susan L; Wick, Elizabeth C.; Fang, Sandy H; Haider, Adil H.; Efron, Jonathan.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 28, No. 1, 01.2014, p. 49-57.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

AlNasser, Monirah ; Schneider, Eric B. ; Gearhart, Susan L ; Wick, Elizabeth C. ; Fang, Sandy H ; Haider, Adil H. ; Efron, Jonathan. / National disparities in laparoscopic colorectal procedures for colon cancer. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2014 ; Vol. 28, No. 1. pp. 49-57.
@article{43f30276848143329dd06f4d56c79ae2,
title = "National disparities in laparoscopic colorectal procedures for colon cancer",
abstract = "Introduction Racial disparity in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been cited as a potential cause for differences in mortality. This study compares the rates of laparoscopy according to race, insurance status, geographic location, and hospital size. Methods The 2009 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project: Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) database was queried to identify patients with the diagnosis of CRC by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to look at age, gender, insurance coverage, academic versus nonacademic affiliated institutions, rural versus urban settings, location, and proportional differences in laparoscopic procedures according to race. Results A total of 14,502 patients were identified; 4,691 (32.35 {\%}) underwent laparoscopic colorectal procedures and 9,811 (67.65 {\%}) underwent open procedures. The proportion of laparoscopic procedures did not differ significantly by race: Caucasian 32.4 {\%}, African-American 30.04 {\%}, Hispanic 33.99 {\%}, and Asian-Pacific Islander 35.12 (P = 0.08). Among Caucasian and African-American patients, those covered by private insurers were more likely to undergo laparoscopic procedures compared to other insurance types (P ≤ 0.001). The odds of receiving laparoscopic procedure at teaching hospitals was 1.39 times greater than in nonteaching hospitals (95 {\%} confidence interval [CI] 1.29-1.48) and did not differ across race groups. Patients in urban hospitals demonstrated higher odds of laparoscopic surgery (2.24, 95 {\%} CI 1.96-2.56) than in rural hospitals; this relationship was consistent within races. The odds of undergoing laparoscopic surgeries was lowest in the Midwest region (0.89, 95 {\%} CI 0.81-0.97) but higher in the Southern region (1.14, 95 {\%} CI 1.06-1.22) compared with the other regions. Conclusions Nearly one-third of all CRC surgeries are laparoscopic. Race does not appear to play a significant role in the selection of a laparoscopic CRC operation. However, there are significant differences in the selection of laparoscopy for CRC patients based on insurance status, geographic location, and hospital type.",
keywords = "Colorectal cancer, Race, Surgical technique",
author = "Monirah AlNasser and Schneider, {Eric B.} and Gearhart, {Susan L} and Wick, {Elizabeth C.} and Fang, {Sandy H} and Haider, {Adil H.} and Jonathan Efron",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-013-3160-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "49--57",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - National disparities in laparoscopic colorectal procedures for colon cancer

AU - AlNasser, Monirah

AU - Schneider, Eric B.

AU - Gearhart, Susan L

AU - Wick, Elizabeth C.

AU - Fang, Sandy H

AU - Haider, Adil H.

AU - Efron, Jonathan

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Introduction Racial disparity in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been cited as a potential cause for differences in mortality. This study compares the rates of laparoscopy according to race, insurance status, geographic location, and hospital size. Methods The 2009 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project: Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) database was queried to identify patients with the diagnosis of CRC by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to look at age, gender, insurance coverage, academic versus nonacademic affiliated institutions, rural versus urban settings, location, and proportional differences in laparoscopic procedures according to race. Results A total of 14,502 patients were identified; 4,691 (32.35 %) underwent laparoscopic colorectal procedures and 9,811 (67.65 %) underwent open procedures. The proportion of laparoscopic procedures did not differ significantly by race: Caucasian 32.4 %, African-American 30.04 %, Hispanic 33.99 %, and Asian-Pacific Islander 35.12 (P = 0.08). Among Caucasian and African-American patients, those covered by private insurers were more likely to undergo laparoscopic procedures compared to other insurance types (P ≤ 0.001). The odds of receiving laparoscopic procedure at teaching hospitals was 1.39 times greater than in nonteaching hospitals (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.29-1.48) and did not differ across race groups. Patients in urban hospitals demonstrated higher odds of laparoscopic surgery (2.24, 95 % CI 1.96-2.56) than in rural hospitals; this relationship was consistent within races. The odds of undergoing laparoscopic surgeries was lowest in the Midwest region (0.89, 95 % CI 0.81-0.97) but higher in the Southern region (1.14, 95 % CI 1.06-1.22) compared with the other regions. Conclusions Nearly one-third of all CRC surgeries are laparoscopic. Race does not appear to play a significant role in the selection of a laparoscopic CRC operation. However, there are significant differences in the selection of laparoscopy for CRC patients based on insurance status, geographic location, and hospital type.

AB - Introduction Racial disparity in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) has been cited as a potential cause for differences in mortality. This study compares the rates of laparoscopy according to race, insurance status, geographic location, and hospital size. Methods The 2009 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project: Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) database was queried to identify patients with the diagnosis of CRC by the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) codes. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to look at age, gender, insurance coverage, academic versus nonacademic affiliated institutions, rural versus urban settings, location, and proportional differences in laparoscopic procedures according to race. Results A total of 14,502 patients were identified; 4,691 (32.35 %) underwent laparoscopic colorectal procedures and 9,811 (67.65 %) underwent open procedures. The proportion of laparoscopic procedures did not differ significantly by race: Caucasian 32.4 %, African-American 30.04 %, Hispanic 33.99 %, and Asian-Pacific Islander 35.12 (P = 0.08). Among Caucasian and African-American patients, those covered by private insurers were more likely to undergo laparoscopic procedures compared to other insurance types (P ≤ 0.001). The odds of receiving laparoscopic procedure at teaching hospitals was 1.39 times greater than in nonteaching hospitals (95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.29-1.48) and did not differ across race groups. Patients in urban hospitals demonstrated higher odds of laparoscopic surgery (2.24, 95 % CI 1.96-2.56) than in rural hospitals; this relationship was consistent within races. The odds of undergoing laparoscopic surgeries was lowest in the Midwest region (0.89, 95 % CI 0.81-0.97) but higher in the Southern region (1.14, 95 % CI 1.06-1.22) compared with the other regions. Conclusions Nearly one-third of all CRC surgeries are laparoscopic. Race does not appear to play a significant role in the selection of a laparoscopic CRC operation. However, there are significant differences in the selection of laparoscopy for CRC patients based on insurance status, geographic location, and hospital type.

KW - Colorectal cancer

KW - Race

KW - Surgical technique

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892989041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892989041&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-013-3160-8

DO - 10.1007/s00464-013-3160-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 24002916

AN - SCOPUS:84892989041

VL - 28

SP - 49

EP - 57

JO - Surgical Endoscopy

JF - Surgical Endoscopy

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 1

ER -