Music Listening as a Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Nursing Intervention for Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Patients: A Randomized Comparative Clinical Trial

Sylvia Urso, Jiangxia Wang, Kelly M. Webber, Alexander Pantelyat, Laura Kaiser, Maria Liza Anicoche, Tricia Bulacan, Myrna Mamaril

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Randomized comparative mixed method approach with qualitative inquiry study's aim sought to determine if there was a difference in pre/post-intervention State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores and postanesthesia pain scores between two music listening groups of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy patients. Design: Prospective randomized comparative mixed method approach with a qualitative inquiry. Methods: Sample size of 77 male participants assigned by a table of random numbers to Spotify patient-preferred music selection Group I (n = 37) or minimalist hypnotic music with guided relaxation breathing (MHMGRB) instructional narrative Group II (n = 40). Outcome measures used patients’ STAI questionnaire and reported PACU admission and discharge pain scores. Results: Both Groups I and II had reduced pain scores at discharge as compared to admission; both groups had a significant reduction (P =.046 Group I, and Group II (P =.002), but changes for comparative groups (I and II) were not significant between the two groups (P =.53). Conclusions: Study revealed that both patient-preferred selected music and MHMGRB can meaningfully reduce patients’ anxiety and PACU pain scores.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)848-857.e1
JournalJournal of Perianesthesia Nursing
Volume37
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2022

Keywords

  • laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
  • music listening
  • randomized comparative study

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medical–Surgical

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Music Listening as a Postanesthesia Care Unit (PACU) Nursing Intervention for Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Patients: A Randomized Comparative Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this