Musculoskeletal Radiology Reports: Overlooked or Valuable?

Sadaf Sahraian, Matthew D. Alvin, Arya Haj-Mirzaian, Rozita Jalilianhasanpour, Elham Beheshtian, Evan Honig, Mona Shahriari, Mert Uzner, Shadpour Demehri, David M. Yousem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The electronic medical record (EMR) can reveal preferences of clinicians regarding imaging services. We sought to evaluate viewing habits for reports and images of musculoskeletal (MSK) studies by ordering clinicians. We hypothesized that MSK reports are important to clinical management, especially for advanced imaging modalities. We tracked the image and report access of all MSK studies ordered in September 2016 over 8 months using logs of the EMR (Epic Systems, Verona, WI), and by an independent analysis of the institutional PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication Systems) (Carestream Health, Rochester, NY). The time stamps were extracted for when images and reports were viewed. We categorized MSK studies by modality and provider department. We also compared the rates of viewing reports and images among different modalities and departments using the chi-square test. Of the 8143 viewed MSK studies, 7842 (96.3%) reports (with/without images) and 3916 (48.1%) imaging data (with/without reports) were viewed. Viewing reports alone occurred in 4227 (51.9%) studies. CT and MRI reports alone views occurred more often in comparison to radiographs ([482/706; 68.3%] for CT and [981/1713; 57.3%] for MRI vs. [2764/5724; 48.3%] for radiography, p < 0.001). Orthopedists ordered the highest number of MSK studies and viewed reports 99.2% (3216/3242) of the time, including a 54.6% (1770/3242) rate of viewing reports alone and a 44.6% (1446/3242) rate of viewing both reports and images. They viewed images without reports in 0.8% (27/3242) of cases. MSK reports were viewed significantly more frequently than the images across all modalities and all relevant specialties.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)348-354
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Digital Imaging
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2020

Keywords

  • EMR
  • Musculoskeletal
  • PACS
  • Value
  • Viewing imaging
  • Viewing report

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Computer Science Applications

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Musculoskeletal Radiology Reports: Overlooked or Valuable?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Sahraian, S., Alvin, M. D., Haj-Mirzaian, A., Jalilianhasanpour, R., Beheshtian, E., Honig, E., Shahriari, M., Uzner, M., Demehri, S., & Yousem, D. M. (2020). Musculoskeletal Radiology Reports: Overlooked or Valuable? Journal of Digital Imaging, 33(2), 348-354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-019-00286-0