Muscle Functional Morphology in Paleobiology

The Past, Present, and Future of “Paleomyology”

Jonathan M G Perry, Kristen A. Prufrock

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Our knowledge of muscle anatomy and physiology in vertebrates has increased dramatically over the last two-hundred years. Today, much is understood about how muscles contract and about the functional meaning of muscular variation at multiple scales. Progress in muscle anatomy has profited from the availability of broad comparative samples, advances in microscopy have permitted comparisons at increasingly finer scales, and progress in muscle physiology has profited from many carefully designed and executed experiments. Several avenues of future work are promising. In particular, muscle ontogeny (growth and development) is poorly understood for many vertebrate groups. We consider which types of advances in muscle functional morphology are of use to paleobiologists. These are only a modest subset for muscle anatomy and a very small subset for muscle physiology. The relationship between muscle and bone – spatially and mechanically—is critical to any future advances in “paleomyology”. Anat Rec, 301:538–555, 2018.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)538-555
Number of pages18
JournalAnatomical Record
Volume301
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

paleobiology
functional morphology
muscle
Muscles
muscles
muscle physiology
anatomy
physiology
Anatomy
vertebrates
Vertebrates
vertebrate
ontogeny
microscopy
growth and development
Growth and Development
bones
bone
Microscopy
Bone and Bones

Keywords

  • adaptation
  • anatomy
  • muscle
  • review
  • vertebrates

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anatomy
  • Biotechnology
  • Histology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Cite this

Muscle Functional Morphology in Paleobiology : The Past, Present, and Future of “Paleomyology”. / Perry, Jonathan M G; Prufrock, Kristen A.

In: Anatomical Record, Vol. 301, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 538-555.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fc19b35160a34803bd45d9d9b1133623,
title = "Muscle Functional Morphology in Paleobiology: The Past, Present, and Future of “Paleomyology”",
abstract = "Our knowledge of muscle anatomy and physiology in vertebrates has increased dramatically over the last two-hundred years. Today, much is understood about how muscles contract and about the functional meaning of muscular variation at multiple scales. Progress in muscle anatomy has profited from the availability of broad comparative samples, advances in microscopy have permitted comparisons at increasingly finer scales, and progress in muscle physiology has profited from many carefully designed and executed experiments. Several avenues of future work are promising. In particular, muscle ontogeny (growth and development) is poorly understood for many vertebrate groups. We consider which types of advances in muscle functional morphology are of use to paleobiologists. These are only a modest subset for muscle anatomy and a very small subset for muscle physiology. The relationship between muscle and bone – spatially and mechanically—is critical to any future advances in “paleomyology”. Anat Rec, 301:538–555, 2018.",
keywords = "adaptation, anatomy, muscle, review, vertebrates",
author = "Perry, {Jonathan M G} and Prufrock, {Kristen A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ar.23772",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "301",
pages = "538--555",
journal = "Anatomical Record",
issn = "1932-8486",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Muscle Functional Morphology in Paleobiology

T2 - The Past, Present, and Future of “Paleomyology”

AU - Perry, Jonathan M G

AU - Prufrock, Kristen A.

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Our knowledge of muscle anatomy and physiology in vertebrates has increased dramatically over the last two-hundred years. Today, much is understood about how muscles contract and about the functional meaning of muscular variation at multiple scales. Progress in muscle anatomy has profited from the availability of broad comparative samples, advances in microscopy have permitted comparisons at increasingly finer scales, and progress in muscle physiology has profited from many carefully designed and executed experiments. Several avenues of future work are promising. In particular, muscle ontogeny (growth and development) is poorly understood for many vertebrate groups. We consider which types of advances in muscle functional morphology are of use to paleobiologists. These are only a modest subset for muscle anatomy and a very small subset for muscle physiology. The relationship between muscle and bone – spatially and mechanically—is critical to any future advances in “paleomyology”. Anat Rec, 301:538–555, 2018.

AB - Our knowledge of muscle anatomy and physiology in vertebrates has increased dramatically over the last two-hundred years. Today, much is understood about how muscles contract and about the functional meaning of muscular variation at multiple scales. Progress in muscle anatomy has profited from the availability of broad comparative samples, advances in microscopy have permitted comparisons at increasingly finer scales, and progress in muscle physiology has profited from many carefully designed and executed experiments. Several avenues of future work are promising. In particular, muscle ontogeny (growth and development) is poorly understood for many vertebrate groups. We consider which types of advances in muscle functional morphology are of use to paleobiologists. These are only a modest subset for muscle anatomy and a very small subset for muscle physiology. The relationship between muscle and bone – spatially and mechanically—is critical to any future advances in “paleomyology”. Anat Rec, 301:538–555, 2018.

KW - adaptation

KW - anatomy

KW - muscle

KW - review

KW - vertebrates

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041810525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85041810525&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ar.23772

DO - 10.1002/ar.23772

M3 - Article

VL - 301

SP - 538

EP - 555

JO - Anatomical Record

JF - Anatomical Record

SN - 1932-8486

IS - 3

ER -