Multisite exploration of clinical decision making for antibiotic use by emergency medicine providers using quantitative and qualitative methods

Larissa May, Glencora Gudger, Paige Armstrong, Gillian Brooks, Pamela Hinds, Rahul Bhat, Gregory J. Moran, Lisa Schwartz, Sara Cosgrove, Eili Klein, Richard Rothman, Cynthia S Rand

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

objectives. To explore current practices and decision making regarding antimicrobial prescribing among emergency department (ED) clinical providers. methods. We conducted a survey of ED providers recruited from 8 sites in 3 cities. Using purposeful sampling, we then recruited 21 providers for in-depth interviews. Additionally, we observed 10 patient-provider interactions at one of the ED sites. SAS 9.3 was used for descriptive and predictive statistics. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a thematic, constructivist approach with consensus coding using NVivo 10.0. Field and interview notes collected during the observational study were aligned with themes identified through individual interviews. results. Of 150 survey respondents, 76% agreed or strongly agreed that antibiotics are overused in the ED, while half believed they personally did not overprescribe. Eighty-nine percent used a smartphone or tablet in the ED for antibiotic prescribing decisions. Several significant differences were found between attending and resident physicians. Interview analysis identified 42 codes aggregated into the following themes: (1) resource and environmental factors that affect care; (2) access to and quality of care received outside of the ED consult; (3) patient-provider relationships; (4) clinical inertia; and (5) local knowledge generation. The observational study revealed limited patient understanding of antibiotic use. Providers relied heavily upon diagnostics and provided limited education to patients. Most patients denied a priori expectations of being prescribed antibiotics. conclusions. Patient, provider, and healthcare system factors should be considered when designing interventions to improve antimicrobial stewardship in the ED setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1114-1125
Number of pages12
JournalInfection Control and Hospital Epidemiology
Volume35
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Emergency Medicine
Hospital Emergency Service
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Interviews
Observational Studies
Quality of Health Care
Patient Education
Clinical Decision-Making
Tablets
Consensus
Decision Making
Delivery of Health Care
Physicians
Surveys and Questionnaires

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Epidemiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Multisite exploration of clinical decision making for antibiotic use by emergency medicine providers using quantitative and qualitative methods. / May, Larissa; Gudger, Glencora; Armstrong, Paige; Brooks, Gillian; Hinds, Pamela; Bhat, Rahul; Moran, Gregory J.; Schwartz, Lisa; Cosgrove, Sara; Klein, Eili; Rothman, Richard; Rand, Cynthia S.

In: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Vol. 35, No. 9, 2014, p. 1114-1125.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

May, Larissa ; Gudger, Glencora ; Armstrong, Paige ; Brooks, Gillian ; Hinds, Pamela ; Bhat, Rahul ; Moran, Gregory J. ; Schwartz, Lisa ; Cosgrove, Sara ; Klein, Eili ; Rothman, Richard ; Rand, Cynthia S. / Multisite exploration of clinical decision making for antibiotic use by emergency medicine providers using quantitative and qualitative methods. In: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2014 ; Vol. 35, No. 9. pp. 1114-1125.
@article{12af5bb90ae6436d90e227f661666837,
title = "Multisite exploration of clinical decision making for antibiotic use by emergency medicine providers using quantitative and qualitative methods",
abstract = "objectives. To explore current practices and decision making regarding antimicrobial prescribing among emergency department (ED) clinical providers. methods. We conducted a survey of ED providers recruited from 8 sites in 3 cities. Using purposeful sampling, we then recruited 21 providers for in-depth interviews. Additionally, we observed 10 patient-provider interactions at one of the ED sites. SAS 9.3 was used for descriptive and predictive statistics. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a thematic, constructivist approach with consensus coding using NVivo 10.0. Field and interview notes collected during the observational study were aligned with themes identified through individual interviews. results. Of 150 survey respondents, 76{\%} agreed or strongly agreed that antibiotics are overused in the ED, while half believed they personally did not overprescribe. Eighty-nine percent used a smartphone or tablet in the ED for antibiotic prescribing decisions. Several significant differences were found between attending and resident physicians. Interview analysis identified 42 codes aggregated into the following themes: (1) resource and environmental factors that affect care; (2) access to and quality of care received outside of the ED consult; (3) patient-provider relationships; (4) clinical inertia; and (5) local knowledge generation. The observational study revealed limited patient understanding of antibiotic use. Providers relied heavily upon diagnostics and provided limited education to patients. Most patients denied a priori expectations of being prescribed antibiotics. conclusions. Patient, provider, and healthcare system factors should be considered when designing interventions to improve antimicrobial stewardship in the ED setting.",
author = "Larissa May and Glencora Gudger and Paige Armstrong and Gillian Brooks and Pamela Hinds and Rahul Bhat and Moran, {Gregory J.} and Lisa Schwartz and Sara Cosgrove and Eili Klein and Richard Rothman and Rand, {Cynthia S}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1086/677637",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "35",
pages = "1114--1125",
journal = "Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology",
issn = "0899-823X",
publisher = "University of Chicago Press",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multisite exploration of clinical decision making for antibiotic use by emergency medicine providers using quantitative and qualitative methods

AU - May, Larissa

AU - Gudger, Glencora

AU - Armstrong, Paige

AU - Brooks, Gillian

AU - Hinds, Pamela

AU - Bhat, Rahul

AU - Moran, Gregory J.

AU - Schwartz, Lisa

AU - Cosgrove, Sara

AU - Klein, Eili

AU - Rothman, Richard

AU - Rand, Cynthia S

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - objectives. To explore current practices and decision making regarding antimicrobial prescribing among emergency department (ED) clinical providers. methods. We conducted a survey of ED providers recruited from 8 sites in 3 cities. Using purposeful sampling, we then recruited 21 providers for in-depth interviews. Additionally, we observed 10 patient-provider interactions at one of the ED sites. SAS 9.3 was used for descriptive and predictive statistics. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a thematic, constructivist approach with consensus coding using NVivo 10.0. Field and interview notes collected during the observational study were aligned with themes identified through individual interviews. results. Of 150 survey respondents, 76% agreed or strongly agreed that antibiotics are overused in the ED, while half believed they personally did not overprescribe. Eighty-nine percent used a smartphone or tablet in the ED for antibiotic prescribing decisions. Several significant differences were found between attending and resident physicians. Interview analysis identified 42 codes aggregated into the following themes: (1) resource and environmental factors that affect care; (2) access to and quality of care received outside of the ED consult; (3) patient-provider relationships; (4) clinical inertia; and (5) local knowledge generation. The observational study revealed limited patient understanding of antibiotic use. Providers relied heavily upon diagnostics and provided limited education to patients. Most patients denied a priori expectations of being prescribed antibiotics. conclusions. Patient, provider, and healthcare system factors should be considered when designing interventions to improve antimicrobial stewardship in the ED setting.

AB - objectives. To explore current practices and decision making regarding antimicrobial prescribing among emergency department (ED) clinical providers. methods. We conducted a survey of ED providers recruited from 8 sites in 3 cities. Using purposeful sampling, we then recruited 21 providers for in-depth interviews. Additionally, we observed 10 patient-provider interactions at one of the ED sites. SAS 9.3 was used for descriptive and predictive statistics. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a thematic, constructivist approach with consensus coding using NVivo 10.0. Field and interview notes collected during the observational study were aligned with themes identified through individual interviews. results. Of 150 survey respondents, 76% agreed or strongly agreed that antibiotics are overused in the ED, while half believed they personally did not overprescribe. Eighty-nine percent used a smartphone or tablet in the ED for antibiotic prescribing decisions. Several significant differences were found between attending and resident physicians. Interview analysis identified 42 codes aggregated into the following themes: (1) resource and environmental factors that affect care; (2) access to and quality of care received outside of the ED consult; (3) patient-provider relationships; (4) clinical inertia; and (5) local knowledge generation. The observational study revealed limited patient understanding of antibiotic use. Providers relied heavily upon diagnostics and provided limited education to patients. Most patients denied a priori expectations of being prescribed antibiotics. conclusions. Patient, provider, and healthcare system factors should be considered when designing interventions to improve antimicrobial stewardship in the ED setting.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905965597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905965597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1086/677637

DO - 10.1086/677637

M3 - Article

C2 - 25111919

AN - SCOPUS:84905965597

VL - 35

SP - 1114

EP - 1125

JO - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

JF - Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology

SN - 0899-823X

IS - 9

ER -