Multiple micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy in low-income countries: A meta-analysis of effects on birth size and length of gestation

Caroline H.D. Fall, David J. Fisher, Clive Osmond, Barrie M. Margetts, Pierre Adou, Víctor M. Aguayo, Lindsay H. Allen, Zulfiqar Ahmed Bhutta, Parul Christian, Shaonong Dang, Gwenola Desplats, Michael Dibley, Shams El Arifeen, Henrik Friis, Exnevia Gomo, Batool Azra Haider, Adi Hidayat, Abbas Jahari, Pernille Kaestel, Patrick KolsterenKusharisupeni, Aissa Mamadoultaibou, Dharma Sharna Mandandhar, Barrie Margetts, David Osrin, Lars Ake Persson, Usha Ramakrishnan, Dominique Roberfroid, Carine Ronsmans, Anuraj H. Shankar, Subarkah, Sunawang, Budi Utomo, Anjana Vaidya, Hong Yan, Noel Zagre, Lingxia Zeng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

146 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. Multiple micronutrient deficiencies are common among women in low-income countries and may adversely affect pregnancy outcomes. Objective. This meta-analysis reports the effects on newborn size and duration of gestation of multiple micronutrient supplementation mainly compared with iron plus folic acid during pregnancy in recent rand-omized, controlled trials. Methods. Original data from 12 randomized, control-led trials in Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, China, Guinea-Bissau, Indonesia, Mexico, Nepal, Niger, Pakistan and Zimbabwe, all providing approximately 1 recommended dietary allowance (RDA) of multiple micronutrients to presumed HIV-negative women, were included. Out-comes included birthweight, other birth measurements, gestation, and incidence of low birthweight (LBW) (< 2,500g), small-for-gestational age birth (SGA, birth-weight below the within-each-population 10th percen-tile), large-for-gestational age birth (LGA, birthweight above the within-each- population 90th percentile), and preterm delivery (< 37 weeks). Results. Compared with control supplementation (mainly with iron-folic acid), multiple micronutrient supplementation was associated with an increase in mean birthweight (pooled estimate: +22.4 g [95% CI, 8.3 to 36.4 g]; p = .002), a reduction in the prevalence of LBW (pooled OR = 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81 to 0.97];p = .01) and SGA birth (pooled OR = 0.90 [95% CI, 0.82 to 0.99]; p = .03), and an increase in the prevalence of LGA birth (pooled OR = 1.13 [95% CI, 1.00 to 1.28]; p = .04). In most studies, the effects on birthweight were greater in mothers with higher body mass index (BMI). In the pooled analysis, the positive effect of multiple micro-nutrients on birthweight increased by 7.6 g (95% CI, 1.9 to 13.3 g) per unit increase in maternal BMI (p for interaction = .009). The intervention effect relative to the control group was + 39.0 g (95% CI, +22.0 to +56.1 g) in mothers with BMI of 20 kg/m2 or higher compared with -6.0 g (95% CI, -8.8 to +16.8 g) in mothers with BMI under 20 kg/m2. There were no significant effects of multiple micronutrient supplementation on birth length or head circumference nor on the duration of gestation (pooled effect: +0.17 day [95% CI, -0.35 to +0.70 day]; p = .51) or the incidence of preterm birth (pooled OR = 1.00 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.09]; p = .92). Conclusions. Compared with iron-folic acid sup-plementation alone, maternal supplementation with multiple micronutrients during pregnancy in low-income countries resulted in a small increase in birthweight and a reduction in the prevalence of LBW of about 10%. The effect was greater among women with higher BMI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S533-S546
JournalFood and nutrition bulletin
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2009

Keywords

  • Birth outcomes
  • Birthweight
  • Iron-folic acid
  • Maternal body mass index
  • Meta-analysis
  • Multiple micronutrients
  • Pregnancy
  • Preterm delivery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multiple micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy in low-income countries: A meta-analysis of effects on birth size and length of gestation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this