Multiple human papillomavirus infections and type competition in men

Anne F. Rositch, Charles Poole, Michael G. Hudgens, Kawango Agot, Edith Nyagaya, Stephen Moses, Peter J.F. Snijders, Chris J.L.M. Meijer, Robert C. Bailey, Jennifer S. Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background. There is little information on multiple human papillomavirus (HPV) infections and the potential for type competition in men, yet competition may impact the type-specific efficacy of HPV vaccination. Methods. Among 2702 uncircumcised men in Kisumu, Kenya, who were seronegative for human immunodeficiency virus, the observed numbers of HPV types detected were compared with the expected number, which was simulated under the assumption of independent infections. To assess the potential for HPV type competition, adjusted odds ratios for pairwise combinations of prevalent HPV type infections were estimated using semi-Bayesian methods. Results. Half of all men were HPV positive, of whom 57% had multiple HPV types. We observed men without HPV infection and with ≥4 HPV types more often than expected if infections were independent. No negative associations between individual HPV types were observed. HPV types 31, 39, 56, 58, and 59 were positively associated with both carcinogenic vaccine types HPV-16 and HPV-18 (2-sided P value <.05). Conclusions. Men who were HPV infected were likely to test positive for >1 HPV type. Cross-sectional associations between individual HPV types were positive and did not appear to be type-specific. Thus, we did not identify HPV types that are candidates for potential HPV type competition in men.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)72-81
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Infectious Diseases
Volume205
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Infectious Diseases

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multiple human papillomavirus infections and type competition in men'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this