Multimethod assessment of psychopathology among DSM-IV subtypes of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Self-, parent, and teacher reports

David S. Crystal, Rick Ostrander, Ru San Chen, Gerald J. August

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Using data based on self-, parent, and teacher reports, we assessed various aspects of psychopathelogy in a large sample of control children and those with ADHD. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to extract response bias from latent constructs of aggression, anxiety, attention problems, depression, conduct disorder, and hyperactivity. These latent constructs were then entered into logistic regression equations to predict membership in control versus ADHD groups, and to discriminate between ADHD subtypes. Results of the regression equations showed that higher levels of attention problems and aggression were the best predictors of membership in the ADHD group relative to controls. Logistic regression also indicated that a higher degree of aggression was the only significant predictor of membership in the ADHD-Combined group compared to the ADHD-Inattentive group. However, when comorbid diagnoses of Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder were controlled for in the logistic regression, greater hyperactivity rather than aggression was the sole variable with which to distinguish the ADHD-Combined from the ADHD-Inattentive subtype. Results are discussed in the context of the DSM-IV ADHD nosology and the role of instrument and source bias in the diagnosis of ADHD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)189-205
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology
Volume29
Issue number3
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity
Aggression
Psychopathology
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
Conduct Disorder
Logistic Models
Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders
Statistical Factor Analysis
Anxiety
Depression

Keywords

  • ADHD
  • Confirmatory factor analysis
  • Multimethod assessment
  • Subtypes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Multimethod assessment of psychopathology among DSM-IV subtypes of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder : Self-, parent, and teacher reports. / Crystal, David S.; Ostrander, Rick; Chen, Ru San; August, Gerald J.

In: Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2001, p. 189-205.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0adeb555f0a148f6b97bece28f968a4c,
title = "Multimethod assessment of psychopathology among DSM-IV subtypes of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Self-, parent, and teacher reports",
abstract = "Using data based on self-, parent, and teacher reports, we assessed various aspects of psychopathelogy in a large sample of control children and those with ADHD. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to extract response bias from latent constructs of aggression, anxiety, attention problems, depression, conduct disorder, and hyperactivity. These latent constructs were then entered into logistic regression equations to predict membership in control versus ADHD groups, and to discriminate between ADHD subtypes. Results of the regression equations showed that higher levels of attention problems and aggression were the best predictors of membership in the ADHD group relative to controls. Logistic regression also indicated that a higher degree of aggression was the only significant predictor of membership in the ADHD-Combined group compared to the ADHD-Inattentive group. However, when comorbid diagnoses of Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder were controlled for in the logistic regression, greater hyperactivity rather than aggression was the sole variable with which to distinguish the ADHD-Combined from the ADHD-Inattentive subtype. Results are discussed in the context of the DSM-IV ADHD nosology and the role of instrument and source bias in the diagnosis of ADHD.",
keywords = "ADHD, Confirmatory factor analysis, Multimethod assessment, Subtypes",
author = "Crystal, {David S.} and Rick Ostrander and Chen, {Ru San} and August, {Gerald J.}",
year = "2001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "189--205",
journal = "Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology",
issn = "0091-0627",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multimethod assessment of psychopathology among DSM-IV subtypes of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

T2 - Self-, parent, and teacher reports

AU - Crystal, David S.

AU - Ostrander, Rick

AU - Chen, Ru San

AU - August, Gerald J.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Using data based on self-, parent, and teacher reports, we assessed various aspects of psychopathelogy in a large sample of control children and those with ADHD. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to extract response bias from latent constructs of aggression, anxiety, attention problems, depression, conduct disorder, and hyperactivity. These latent constructs were then entered into logistic regression equations to predict membership in control versus ADHD groups, and to discriminate between ADHD subtypes. Results of the regression equations showed that higher levels of attention problems and aggression were the best predictors of membership in the ADHD group relative to controls. Logistic regression also indicated that a higher degree of aggression was the only significant predictor of membership in the ADHD-Combined group compared to the ADHD-Inattentive group. However, when comorbid diagnoses of Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder were controlled for in the logistic regression, greater hyperactivity rather than aggression was the sole variable with which to distinguish the ADHD-Combined from the ADHD-Inattentive subtype. Results are discussed in the context of the DSM-IV ADHD nosology and the role of instrument and source bias in the diagnosis of ADHD.

AB - Using data based on self-, parent, and teacher reports, we assessed various aspects of psychopathelogy in a large sample of control children and those with ADHD. Confirmatory factor analysis was employed to extract response bias from latent constructs of aggression, anxiety, attention problems, depression, conduct disorder, and hyperactivity. These latent constructs were then entered into logistic regression equations to predict membership in control versus ADHD groups, and to discriminate between ADHD subtypes. Results of the regression equations showed that higher levels of attention problems and aggression were the best predictors of membership in the ADHD group relative to controls. Logistic regression also indicated that a higher degree of aggression was the only significant predictor of membership in the ADHD-Combined group compared to the ADHD-Inattentive group. However, when comorbid diagnoses of Oppositional Defiant Disorder and Conduct Disorder were controlled for in the logistic regression, greater hyperactivity rather than aggression was the sole variable with which to distinguish the ADHD-Combined from the ADHD-Inattentive subtype. Results are discussed in the context of the DSM-IV ADHD nosology and the role of instrument and source bias in the diagnosis of ADHD.

KW - ADHD

KW - Confirmatory factor analysis

KW - Multimethod assessment

KW - Subtypes

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035380379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035380379&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11411782

AN - SCOPUS:0035380379

VL - 29

SP - 189

EP - 205

JO - Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

JF - Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

SN - 0091-0627

IS - 3

ER -