Multilevel mapping of sexual dimorphism in intrinsic functional brain networks

Nina De Lacy, Elizabeth McCauley, J. Nathan Kutz, Vince D. Calhoun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Differences in cognitive performance between males and females are well-described, most commonly in certain spatial and language tasks. Sex-related differences in cognition are relevant to the study of the neurotypical brain and to neuropsychiatric disorders, which exhibit prominent disparities in the incidence, prevalence and severity of symptoms between men and women. While structural dimorphism in the human brain is well-described, controversy exists regarding the existence and degree of sex-related differences in brain function. We analyzed resting-state functional MRI from 650 neurotypical young adults matched for age and sex to determine the degree of sexual dimorphism present in intrinsic functional networks. Multilevel modeling was pursued to create 8-, 24-, and 51-network models of whole-brain data to quantify sex-related effects in network activity with increasing resolution. We determined that sexual dimorphism is present in the majority of intrinsic brain networks and affects ∼0.5-2% of brain locations surveyed in the three whole-brain network models. It is particularly common in task-positive control networks and is pervasive among default mode networks. The size of sex-related effects varied by network but can be moderate or even large in size. Female > male effects were on average larger, but male > female effects spread across greater network territory. Using a novel methodology, we mapped dimorphic locations to meta-analytic association test maps derived from task fMRI, demonstrating that the neurocognitive footprint of intrinsic neural correlates is much larger in males. All results were replicated in a motion-matched sub-sample. Our findings argue that sex is an important biological variable in human brain function and suggest that observed differences in neurocognitive performance have identifiable intrinsic neural correlates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number332
JournalFrontiers in Neuroscience
Volume13
Issue numberAPR
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sex Characteristics
Brain
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Cognition
Young Adult
Language
Incidence

Keywords

  • Female
  • Functional MRI
  • ICA
  • Intrinsic networks
  • Male
  • Sex-related differences

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Multilevel mapping of sexual dimorphism in intrinsic functional brain networks. / De Lacy, Nina; McCauley, Elizabeth; Kutz, J. Nathan; Calhoun, Vince D.

In: Frontiers in Neuroscience, Vol. 13, No. APR, 332, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

De Lacy, Nina ; McCauley, Elizabeth ; Kutz, J. Nathan ; Calhoun, Vince D. / Multilevel mapping of sexual dimorphism in intrinsic functional brain networks. In: Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2019 ; Vol. 13, No. APR.
@article{92af2d472f074c618a7ee19726c7a053,
title = "Multilevel mapping of sexual dimorphism in intrinsic functional brain networks",
abstract = "Differences in cognitive performance between males and females are well-described, most commonly in certain spatial and language tasks. Sex-related differences in cognition are relevant to the study of the neurotypical brain and to neuropsychiatric disorders, which exhibit prominent disparities in the incidence, prevalence and severity of symptoms between men and women. While structural dimorphism in the human brain is well-described, controversy exists regarding the existence and degree of sex-related differences in brain function. We analyzed resting-state functional MRI from 650 neurotypical young adults matched for age and sex to determine the degree of sexual dimorphism present in intrinsic functional networks. Multilevel modeling was pursued to create 8-, 24-, and 51-network models of whole-brain data to quantify sex-related effects in network activity with increasing resolution. We determined that sexual dimorphism is present in the majority of intrinsic brain networks and affects ∼0.5-2{\%} of brain locations surveyed in the three whole-brain network models. It is particularly common in task-positive control networks and is pervasive among default mode networks. The size of sex-related effects varied by network but can be moderate or even large in size. Female > male effects were on average larger, but male > female effects spread across greater network territory. Using a novel methodology, we mapped dimorphic locations to meta-analytic association test maps derived from task fMRI, demonstrating that the neurocognitive footprint of intrinsic neural correlates is much larger in males. All results were replicated in a motion-matched sub-sample. Our findings argue that sex is an important biological variable in human brain function and suggest that observed differences in neurocognitive performance have identifiable intrinsic neural correlates.",
keywords = "Female, Functional MRI, ICA, Intrinsic networks, Male, Sex-related differences",
author = "{De Lacy}, Nina and Elizabeth McCauley and Kutz, {J. Nathan} and Calhoun, {Vince D.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3389/fnins.2019.00332",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "13",
journal = "Frontiers in Neuroscience",
issn = "1662-4548",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",
number = "APR",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multilevel mapping of sexual dimorphism in intrinsic functional brain networks

AU - De Lacy, Nina

AU - McCauley, Elizabeth

AU - Kutz, J. Nathan

AU - Calhoun, Vince D.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Differences in cognitive performance between males and females are well-described, most commonly in certain spatial and language tasks. Sex-related differences in cognition are relevant to the study of the neurotypical brain and to neuropsychiatric disorders, which exhibit prominent disparities in the incidence, prevalence and severity of symptoms between men and women. While structural dimorphism in the human brain is well-described, controversy exists regarding the existence and degree of sex-related differences in brain function. We analyzed resting-state functional MRI from 650 neurotypical young adults matched for age and sex to determine the degree of sexual dimorphism present in intrinsic functional networks. Multilevel modeling was pursued to create 8-, 24-, and 51-network models of whole-brain data to quantify sex-related effects in network activity with increasing resolution. We determined that sexual dimorphism is present in the majority of intrinsic brain networks and affects ∼0.5-2% of brain locations surveyed in the three whole-brain network models. It is particularly common in task-positive control networks and is pervasive among default mode networks. The size of sex-related effects varied by network but can be moderate or even large in size. Female > male effects were on average larger, but male > female effects spread across greater network territory. Using a novel methodology, we mapped dimorphic locations to meta-analytic association test maps derived from task fMRI, demonstrating that the neurocognitive footprint of intrinsic neural correlates is much larger in males. All results were replicated in a motion-matched sub-sample. Our findings argue that sex is an important biological variable in human brain function and suggest that observed differences in neurocognitive performance have identifiable intrinsic neural correlates.

AB - Differences in cognitive performance between males and females are well-described, most commonly in certain spatial and language tasks. Sex-related differences in cognition are relevant to the study of the neurotypical brain and to neuropsychiatric disorders, which exhibit prominent disparities in the incidence, prevalence and severity of symptoms between men and women. While structural dimorphism in the human brain is well-described, controversy exists regarding the existence and degree of sex-related differences in brain function. We analyzed resting-state functional MRI from 650 neurotypical young adults matched for age and sex to determine the degree of sexual dimorphism present in intrinsic functional networks. Multilevel modeling was pursued to create 8-, 24-, and 51-network models of whole-brain data to quantify sex-related effects in network activity with increasing resolution. We determined that sexual dimorphism is present in the majority of intrinsic brain networks and affects ∼0.5-2% of brain locations surveyed in the three whole-brain network models. It is particularly common in task-positive control networks and is pervasive among default mode networks. The size of sex-related effects varied by network but can be moderate or even large in size. Female > male effects were on average larger, but male > female effects spread across greater network territory. Using a novel methodology, we mapped dimorphic locations to meta-analytic association test maps derived from task fMRI, demonstrating that the neurocognitive footprint of intrinsic neural correlates is much larger in males. All results were replicated in a motion-matched sub-sample. Our findings argue that sex is an important biological variable in human brain function and suggest that observed differences in neurocognitive performance have identifiable intrinsic neural correlates.

KW - Female

KW - Functional MRI

KW - ICA

KW - Intrinsic networks

KW - Male

KW - Sex-related differences

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068441021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85068441021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fnins.2019.00332

DO - 10.3389/fnins.2019.00332

M3 - Article

C2 - 31024243

AN - SCOPUS:85068441021

VL - 13

JO - Frontiers in Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Neuroscience

SN - 1662-4548

IS - APR

M1 - 332

ER -