Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system)

Hiep T. Nguyen, Carol B. Benson, Bryann Bromley, Jeffrey B. Campbell, Jeanne Chow, Beverly Coleman, Christopher Cooper, Jude Crino, Kassa Darge, C. D. Anthony Herndon, Anthony O. Odibo, Michael J G Somers, Deborah R. Stein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective Urinary tract (UT) dilation is sonographically identified in 1-2% of fetuses and reflects a spectrum of possible uropathies. There is significant variability in the clinical management of individuals with prenatal UT dilation that stems from a paucity of evidence-based information correlating the severity of prenatal UT dilation to postnatal urological pathologies. The lack of correlation between prenatal and postnatal US findings and final urologic diagnosis has been problematic, in large measure because of a lack of consensus and uniformity in defining and classifying UT dilation. Consequently, there is a need for a unified classification system with an accepted standard terminology for the diagnosis and management of prenatal and postnatal UT dilation. Methods A consensus meeting was convened on March 14-15, 2014, in Linthicum, Maryland, USA to propose: 1) a unified description of UT dilation that could be applied both prenatally and postnatally; and 2) a standardized scheme for the perinatal evaluation of these patients based on sonographic criteria (i.e. The classification system). The participating societies included American College of Radiology, the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, the American Society of Pediatric Nephrology, the Society for Fetal Urology, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, the Society for Pediatric Urology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasounds. Results The recommendations proposed in this consensus statement are based on a detailed analysis of the current literature and expert opinion representing common clinical practice. The proposed UTD Classification System (and hence the severity of the UT dilation) is based on six categories in US findings: 1) anterior-posterior renal pelvic diameter (APRPD); 2) calyceal dilation; 3) renal parenchymal thickness; 4) renal parenchymal appearance; 5) bladder abnormalities; and 6) ureteral abnormalities. The classification system is stratified based on gestational age and whether the UT dilation is detected prenatally or postnatally. The panel also proposed a follow-up scheme based on the UTD classification. Conclusion The proposed grading classification system will require extensive evaluation to assess its utility in predicting clinical outcomes. Currently, the grading system is correlated with the risk of postnatal uropathies. Future research will help to further refine the classification system to one that correlates with other clinical outcomes such as the need for surgical intervention or renal function.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)992-998
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Pediatric Urology
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Urinary Tract
Dilatation
Kidney
Urology
Expert Testimony
Prenatal Diagnosis
Terminology
Radiology
Gestational Age
Urinary Bladder
Fetus
Medicine
Pediatrics
Pathology

Keywords

  • Classification
  • Evaluation
  • Hydronephrosis
  • Postnatal
  • Prenatal
  • Ultrasonography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system). / Nguyen, Hiep T.; Benson, Carol B.; Bromley, Bryann; Campbell, Jeffrey B.; Chow, Jeanne; Coleman, Beverly; Cooper, Christopher; Crino, Jude; Darge, Kassa; Anthony Herndon, C. D.; Odibo, Anthony O.; Somers, Michael J G; Stein, Deborah R.

In: Journal of Pediatric Urology, Vol. 10, No. 6, 01.12.2014, p. 992-998.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nguyen, HT, Benson, CB, Bromley, B, Campbell, JB, Chow, J, Coleman, B, Cooper, C, Crino, J, Darge, K, Anthony Herndon, CD, Odibo, AO, Somers, MJG & Stein, DR 2014, 'Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system)', Journal of Pediatric Urology, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 992-998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.002
Nguyen, Hiep T. ; Benson, Carol B. ; Bromley, Bryann ; Campbell, Jeffrey B. ; Chow, Jeanne ; Coleman, Beverly ; Cooper, Christopher ; Crino, Jude ; Darge, Kassa ; Anthony Herndon, C. D. ; Odibo, Anthony O. ; Somers, Michael J G ; Stein, Deborah R. / Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system). In: Journal of Pediatric Urology. 2014 ; Vol. 10, No. 6. pp. 992-998.
@article{4eb43a59db3147cbbf49679c39e802f5,
title = "Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system)",
abstract = "Objective Urinary tract (UT) dilation is sonographically identified in 1-2{\%} of fetuses and reflects a spectrum of possible uropathies. There is significant variability in the clinical management of individuals with prenatal UT dilation that stems from a paucity of evidence-based information correlating the severity of prenatal UT dilation to postnatal urological pathologies. The lack of correlation between prenatal and postnatal US findings and final urologic diagnosis has been problematic, in large measure because of a lack of consensus and uniformity in defining and classifying UT dilation. Consequently, there is a need for a unified classification system with an accepted standard terminology for the diagnosis and management of prenatal and postnatal UT dilation. Methods A consensus meeting was convened on March 14-15, 2014, in Linthicum, Maryland, USA to propose: 1) a unified description of UT dilation that could be applied both prenatally and postnatally; and 2) a standardized scheme for the perinatal evaluation of these patients based on sonographic criteria (i.e. The classification system). The participating societies included American College of Radiology, the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, the American Society of Pediatric Nephrology, the Society for Fetal Urology, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, the Society for Pediatric Urology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasounds. Results The recommendations proposed in this consensus statement are based on a detailed analysis of the current literature and expert opinion representing common clinical practice. The proposed UTD Classification System (and hence the severity of the UT dilation) is based on six categories in US findings: 1) anterior-posterior renal pelvic diameter (APRPD); 2) calyceal dilation; 3) renal parenchymal thickness; 4) renal parenchymal appearance; 5) bladder abnormalities; and 6) ureteral abnormalities. The classification system is stratified based on gestational age and whether the UT dilation is detected prenatally or postnatally. The panel also proposed a follow-up scheme based on the UTD classification. Conclusion The proposed grading classification system will require extensive evaluation to assess its utility in predicting clinical outcomes. Currently, the grading system is correlated with the risk of postnatal uropathies. Future research will help to further refine the classification system to one that correlates with other clinical outcomes such as the need for surgical intervention or renal function.",
keywords = "Classification, Evaluation, Hydronephrosis, Postnatal, Prenatal, Ultrasonography",
author = "Nguyen, {Hiep T.} and Benson, {Carol B.} and Bryann Bromley and Campbell, {Jeffrey B.} and Jeanne Chow and Beverly Coleman and Christopher Cooper and Jude Crino and Kassa Darge and {Anthony Herndon}, {C. D.} and Odibo, {Anthony O.} and Somers, {Michael J G} and Stein, {Deborah R.}",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "992--998",
journal = "Journal of Pediatric Urology",
issn = "1477-5131",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multidisciplinary consensus on the classification of prenatal and postnatal urinary tract dilation (UTD classification system)

AU - Nguyen, Hiep T.

AU - Benson, Carol B.

AU - Bromley, Bryann

AU - Campbell, Jeffrey B.

AU - Chow, Jeanne

AU - Coleman, Beverly

AU - Cooper, Christopher

AU - Crino, Jude

AU - Darge, Kassa

AU - Anthony Herndon, C. D.

AU - Odibo, Anthony O.

AU - Somers, Michael J G

AU - Stein, Deborah R.

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Objective Urinary tract (UT) dilation is sonographically identified in 1-2% of fetuses and reflects a spectrum of possible uropathies. There is significant variability in the clinical management of individuals with prenatal UT dilation that stems from a paucity of evidence-based information correlating the severity of prenatal UT dilation to postnatal urological pathologies. The lack of correlation between prenatal and postnatal US findings and final urologic diagnosis has been problematic, in large measure because of a lack of consensus and uniformity in defining and classifying UT dilation. Consequently, there is a need for a unified classification system with an accepted standard terminology for the diagnosis and management of prenatal and postnatal UT dilation. Methods A consensus meeting was convened on March 14-15, 2014, in Linthicum, Maryland, USA to propose: 1) a unified description of UT dilation that could be applied both prenatally and postnatally; and 2) a standardized scheme for the perinatal evaluation of these patients based on sonographic criteria (i.e. The classification system). The participating societies included American College of Radiology, the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, the American Society of Pediatric Nephrology, the Society for Fetal Urology, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, the Society for Pediatric Urology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasounds. Results The recommendations proposed in this consensus statement are based on a detailed analysis of the current literature and expert opinion representing common clinical practice. The proposed UTD Classification System (and hence the severity of the UT dilation) is based on six categories in US findings: 1) anterior-posterior renal pelvic diameter (APRPD); 2) calyceal dilation; 3) renal parenchymal thickness; 4) renal parenchymal appearance; 5) bladder abnormalities; and 6) ureteral abnormalities. The classification system is stratified based on gestational age and whether the UT dilation is detected prenatally or postnatally. The panel also proposed a follow-up scheme based on the UTD classification. Conclusion The proposed grading classification system will require extensive evaluation to assess its utility in predicting clinical outcomes. Currently, the grading system is correlated with the risk of postnatal uropathies. Future research will help to further refine the classification system to one that correlates with other clinical outcomes such as the need for surgical intervention or renal function.

AB - Objective Urinary tract (UT) dilation is sonographically identified in 1-2% of fetuses and reflects a spectrum of possible uropathies. There is significant variability in the clinical management of individuals with prenatal UT dilation that stems from a paucity of evidence-based information correlating the severity of prenatal UT dilation to postnatal urological pathologies. The lack of correlation between prenatal and postnatal US findings and final urologic diagnosis has been problematic, in large measure because of a lack of consensus and uniformity in defining and classifying UT dilation. Consequently, there is a need for a unified classification system with an accepted standard terminology for the diagnosis and management of prenatal and postnatal UT dilation. Methods A consensus meeting was convened on March 14-15, 2014, in Linthicum, Maryland, USA to propose: 1) a unified description of UT dilation that could be applied both prenatally and postnatally; and 2) a standardized scheme for the perinatal evaluation of these patients based on sonographic criteria (i.e. The classification system). The participating societies included American College of Radiology, the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, the American Society of Pediatric Nephrology, the Society for Fetal Urology, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, the Society for Pediatric Urology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasounds. Results The recommendations proposed in this consensus statement are based on a detailed analysis of the current literature and expert opinion representing common clinical practice. The proposed UTD Classification System (and hence the severity of the UT dilation) is based on six categories in US findings: 1) anterior-posterior renal pelvic diameter (APRPD); 2) calyceal dilation; 3) renal parenchymal thickness; 4) renal parenchymal appearance; 5) bladder abnormalities; and 6) ureteral abnormalities. The classification system is stratified based on gestational age and whether the UT dilation is detected prenatally or postnatally. The panel also proposed a follow-up scheme based on the UTD classification. Conclusion The proposed grading classification system will require extensive evaluation to assess its utility in predicting clinical outcomes. Currently, the grading system is correlated with the risk of postnatal uropathies. Future research will help to further refine the classification system to one that correlates with other clinical outcomes such as the need for surgical intervention or renal function.

KW - Classification

KW - Evaluation

KW - Hydronephrosis

KW - Postnatal

KW - Prenatal

KW - Ultrasonography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916882459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84916882459&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.10.002

M3 - Article

C2 - 25435247

AN - SCOPUS:84916882459

VL - 10

SP - 992

EP - 998

JO - Journal of Pediatric Urology

JF - Journal of Pediatric Urology

SN - 1477-5131

IS - 6

ER -