TY - JOUR
T1 - Multicenter clinical validation of the molecular BD max enteric viral panel for detection of enteric pathogens
AU - Stokes, William
AU - Simner, Patricia J.
AU - Mortensen, Joel
AU - Oethinger, Margret
AU - Stellrecht, Kathleen
AU - Lockamy, Elizabeth
AU - Lay, Tricia
AU - Bouchy, Peggy
AU - Pillai, Dylan R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences-Diagnostic Systems (Sparks, MD, USA).
Funding Information:
We thank Devin S. Gary (Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences- Diagnostic Systems) for insight, discussion, and review during the preparation of the manuscript. We thank Shu Zhang, Infrias Berhane, and Christina Chiao (Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences-Diagnostic Systems) for statistical support. We thank Ram Yogev and Bill Muller for general assistance with the study. The individuals acknowledged here have no additional funding or additional compensation to disclose. We all contributed to the interpretation of the data, critically revised the manuscript for important intellectual content, and approved the final version to be published. This study was supported by Becton, Dickinson and Company, BD Life Sciences- Diagnostic Systems (Sparks, MD, USA). W.S., P.J.S., M.O., J.M., and D.R.P. disclose research funding from Becton, Dickinson and Company. K.S. discloses research funding from Becton, Dickinson and Company, BioFire, and Hologic. E.L., P.B., and T.L. are employees of Becton, Dickinson and Company, the sponsor of the study.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The conventional methodology for gastrointestinal pathogen detection remains time-consuming, expensive, and of limited sensitivity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the BD Max enteric viral panel (Max EVP) assay for identification of viral pathogens in stool specimens from individuals with symptoms of acute gastroenteritis, enteritis, or colitis. Prospective and archival stool specimens from adult and pediatric patients with diarrhea were collected in Cary- Blair medium or unpreserved containers. The results for specimens tested by the Max EVP (on the BD Max platform) were compared to those obtained by the reference method (alternate PCR assays, followed by bidirectional sequencing). Positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were calculated. A total of 2,239 specimens were collected, with 2,148 being included for analysis. In this population, 39.6% of specimens were from outpatients, 42.1% were from patients <21 years old, and 49.7% were from females. Prevalence rates for prospective specimens were 7.3%, 4.5%, 3.5%, 2.4%, and 1.2% for norovirus, sapovirus, astrovirus, rotavirus, and adenovirus, respectively. PPA was 92.8%, 84.9%, 93.0%, 100%, and 95.6%, for norovirus, sapovirus, astrovirus, rotavirus, and adenovirus, respectively. NPA was ≥99.4% for all targets. In conjunction with the clinical presentation, laboratory findings, and epidemiological information, the Max EVP assay is effective for the differential diagnosis of enteric disease caused by norovirus, sapovirus, astrovirus, rotavirus, and adenovirus. This assay can be used individually for patients at high risk for a viral enteropathogen (e.g., in outbreak settings) or as an adjunct to other enteric bacterial panels.
AB - The conventional methodology for gastrointestinal pathogen detection remains time-consuming, expensive, and of limited sensitivity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the BD Max enteric viral panel (Max EVP) assay for identification of viral pathogens in stool specimens from individuals with symptoms of acute gastroenteritis, enteritis, or colitis. Prospective and archival stool specimens from adult and pediatric patients with diarrhea were collected in Cary- Blair medium or unpreserved containers. The results for specimens tested by the Max EVP (on the BD Max platform) were compared to those obtained by the reference method (alternate PCR assays, followed by bidirectional sequencing). Positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) were calculated. A total of 2,239 specimens were collected, with 2,148 being included for analysis. In this population, 39.6% of specimens were from outpatients, 42.1% were from patients <21 years old, and 49.7% were from females. Prevalence rates for prospective specimens were 7.3%, 4.5%, 3.5%, 2.4%, and 1.2% for norovirus, sapovirus, astrovirus, rotavirus, and adenovirus, respectively. PPA was 92.8%, 84.9%, 93.0%, 100%, and 95.6%, for norovirus, sapovirus, astrovirus, rotavirus, and adenovirus, respectively. NPA was ≥99.4% for all targets. In conjunction with the clinical presentation, laboratory findings, and epidemiological information, the Max EVP assay is effective for the differential diagnosis of enteric disease caused by norovirus, sapovirus, astrovirus, rotavirus, and adenovirus. This assay can be used individually for patients at high risk for a viral enteropathogen (e.g., in outbreak settings) or as an adjunct to other enteric bacterial panels.
KW - Adenovirus
KW - Astrovirus
KW - BD Max
KW - Enteric pathogens
KW - Enteric viral panel
KW - Gastrointestinal panel
KW - Norovirus
KW - Rotavirus
KW - Sapovirus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071714181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85071714181&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1128/JCM.00306-19
DO - 10.1128/JCM.00306-19
M3 - Article
C2 - 31270179
AN - SCOPUS:85071714181
SN - 0095-1137
VL - 57
JO - Journal of Clinical Microbiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Microbiology
IS - 9
M1 - e00306-19
ER -