Multi-centre evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of planar and SPECT image quantification: An IAEA phantom study

Brian E. Zimmerman, Darko Grošev, Irène Buvat, Marco A. Coca Pérez, Eric Frey, Alan Green, Anchali Krisanachinda, Michael Lassmann, Michael Ljungberg, Lorena Pozzo, Kamila Afroj Quadir, Mariella A. Terán Gretter, Johann Van Staden, Gian Luca Poli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Accurate quantitation of activity provides the basis for internal dosimetry of targeted radionuclide therapies. This study investigated quantitative imaging capabilities at sites with a variety of experience and equipment and assessed levels of errors in activity quantitation in Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) and planar imaging. Participants from 9 countries took part in a comparison in which planar, SPECT and SPECT with X ray computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging were used to quantify activities of four epoxy-filled cylinders containing 133Ba, which was chosen as a surrogate for 131I. The sources, with nominal volumes of 2, 4, 6 and 23mL, were calibrated for 133Ba activity by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, but the activity was initially unknown to the participants. Imaging was performed in a cylindrical phantom filled with water. Two trials were carried out in which the participants first estimated the activities using their local standard protocols, and then repeated the measurements using a standardized acquisition and analysis protocol. Finally, processing of the imaging data from the second trial was repeated by a single centre using a fixed protocol. In the first trial, the activities were underestimated by about 15% with planar imaging. SPECT with Chang's first order attenuation correction (Chang-AC) and SPECT-CT overestimated the activity by about 10%. The second trial showed moderate improvements in accuracy and variability. Planar imaging was subject to methodological errors, e.g., in the use of a transmission scan for attenuation correction. The use of Chang-AC was subject to variability from the definition of phantom contours. The project demonstrated the need for training and standardized protocols to achieve good levels of quantitative accuracy and precision in a multicentre setting. Absolute quantification of simple objects with no background was possible with the strictest protocol to about 6% with planar imaging and SPECT (with Chang-AC) and within 2% for SPECT-CT. Eine genaue

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalZeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Dec 4 2015

Fingerprint

Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography
X Ray Computed Tomography
Radioisotopes
Technology
Equipment and Supplies
Water

Keywords

  • Comparison
  • Planar
  • Planar
  • Quantitative Bildgebung
  • Quantitative imaging
  • SPECT
  • SPECT
  • Vergleichsstudie

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Multi-centre evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of planar and SPECT image quantification : An IAEA phantom study. / Zimmerman, Brian E.; Grošev, Darko; Buvat, Irène; Coca Pérez, Marco A.; Frey, Eric; Green, Alan; Krisanachinda, Anchali; Lassmann, Michael; Ljungberg, Michael; Pozzo, Lorena; Quadir, Kamila Afroj; Terán Gretter, Mariella A.; Van Staden, Johann; Poli, Gian Luca.

In: Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik, 04.12.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zimmerman, BE, Grošev, D, Buvat, I, Coca Pérez, MA, Frey, E, Green, A, Krisanachinda, A, Lassmann, M, Ljungberg, M, Pozzo, L, Quadir, KA, Terán Gretter, MA, Van Staden, J & Poli, GL 2015, 'Multi-centre evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of planar and SPECT image quantification: An IAEA phantom study', Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zemedi.2016.03.008
Zimmerman, Brian E. ; Grošev, Darko ; Buvat, Irène ; Coca Pérez, Marco A. ; Frey, Eric ; Green, Alan ; Krisanachinda, Anchali ; Lassmann, Michael ; Ljungberg, Michael ; Pozzo, Lorena ; Quadir, Kamila Afroj ; Terán Gretter, Mariella A. ; Van Staden, Johann ; Poli, Gian Luca. / Multi-centre evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of planar and SPECT image quantification : An IAEA phantom study. In: Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik. 2015.
@article{a514bd68544a4c7cabaf70eeafa6b63a,
title = "Multi-centre evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of planar and SPECT image quantification: An IAEA phantom study",
abstract = "Accurate quantitation of activity provides the basis for internal dosimetry of targeted radionuclide therapies. This study investigated quantitative imaging capabilities at sites with a variety of experience and equipment and assessed levels of errors in activity quantitation in Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) and planar imaging. Participants from 9 countries took part in a comparison in which planar, SPECT and SPECT with X ray computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging were used to quantify activities of four epoxy-filled cylinders containing 133Ba, which was chosen as a surrogate for 131I. The sources, with nominal volumes of 2, 4, 6 and 23mL, were calibrated for 133Ba activity by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, but the activity was initially unknown to the participants. Imaging was performed in a cylindrical phantom filled with water. Two trials were carried out in which the participants first estimated the activities using their local standard protocols, and then repeated the measurements using a standardized acquisition and analysis protocol. Finally, processing of the imaging data from the second trial was repeated by a single centre using a fixed protocol. In the first trial, the activities were underestimated by about 15{\%} with planar imaging. SPECT with Chang's first order attenuation correction (Chang-AC) and SPECT-CT overestimated the activity by about 10{\%}. The second trial showed moderate improvements in accuracy and variability. Planar imaging was subject to methodological errors, e.g., in the use of a transmission scan for attenuation correction. The use of Chang-AC was subject to variability from the definition of phantom contours. The project demonstrated the need for training and standardized protocols to achieve good levels of quantitative accuracy and precision in a multicentre setting. Absolute quantification of simple objects with no background was possible with the strictest protocol to about 6{\%} with planar imaging and SPECT (with Chang-AC) and within 2{\%} for SPECT-CT. Eine genaue",
keywords = "Comparison, Planar, Planar, Quantitative Bildgebung, Quantitative imaging, SPECT, SPECT, Vergleichsstudie",
author = "Zimmerman, {Brian E.} and Darko Grošev and Ir{\`e}ne Buvat and {Coca P{\'e}rez}, {Marco A.} and Eric Frey and Alan Green and Anchali Krisanachinda and Michael Lassmann and Michael Ljungberg and Lorena Pozzo and Quadir, {Kamila Afroj} and {Ter{\'a}n Gretter}, {Mariella A.} and {Van Staden}, Johann and Poli, {Gian Luca}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1016/j.zemedi.2016.03.008",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik",
issn = "0939-3889",
publisher = "Urban und Fischer Verlag Jena",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multi-centre evaluation of accuracy and reproducibility of planar and SPECT image quantification

T2 - An IAEA phantom study

AU - Zimmerman, Brian E.

AU - Grošev, Darko

AU - Buvat, Irène

AU - Coca Pérez, Marco A.

AU - Frey, Eric

AU - Green, Alan

AU - Krisanachinda, Anchali

AU - Lassmann, Michael

AU - Ljungberg, Michael

AU - Pozzo, Lorena

AU - Quadir, Kamila Afroj

AU - Terán Gretter, Mariella A.

AU - Van Staden, Johann

AU - Poli, Gian Luca

PY - 2015/12/4

Y1 - 2015/12/4

N2 - Accurate quantitation of activity provides the basis for internal dosimetry of targeted radionuclide therapies. This study investigated quantitative imaging capabilities at sites with a variety of experience and equipment and assessed levels of errors in activity quantitation in Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) and planar imaging. Participants from 9 countries took part in a comparison in which planar, SPECT and SPECT with X ray computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging were used to quantify activities of four epoxy-filled cylinders containing 133Ba, which was chosen as a surrogate for 131I. The sources, with nominal volumes of 2, 4, 6 and 23mL, were calibrated for 133Ba activity by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, but the activity was initially unknown to the participants. Imaging was performed in a cylindrical phantom filled with water. Two trials were carried out in which the participants first estimated the activities using their local standard protocols, and then repeated the measurements using a standardized acquisition and analysis protocol. Finally, processing of the imaging data from the second trial was repeated by a single centre using a fixed protocol. In the first trial, the activities were underestimated by about 15% with planar imaging. SPECT with Chang's first order attenuation correction (Chang-AC) and SPECT-CT overestimated the activity by about 10%. The second trial showed moderate improvements in accuracy and variability. Planar imaging was subject to methodological errors, e.g., in the use of a transmission scan for attenuation correction. The use of Chang-AC was subject to variability from the definition of phantom contours. The project demonstrated the need for training and standardized protocols to achieve good levels of quantitative accuracy and precision in a multicentre setting. Absolute quantification of simple objects with no background was possible with the strictest protocol to about 6% with planar imaging and SPECT (with Chang-AC) and within 2% for SPECT-CT. Eine genaue

AB - Accurate quantitation of activity provides the basis for internal dosimetry of targeted radionuclide therapies. This study investigated quantitative imaging capabilities at sites with a variety of experience and equipment and assessed levels of errors in activity quantitation in Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) and planar imaging. Participants from 9 countries took part in a comparison in which planar, SPECT and SPECT with X ray computed tomography (SPECT-CT) imaging were used to quantify activities of four epoxy-filled cylinders containing 133Ba, which was chosen as a surrogate for 131I. The sources, with nominal volumes of 2, 4, 6 and 23mL, were calibrated for 133Ba activity by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, but the activity was initially unknown to the participants. Imaging was performed in a cylindrical phantom filled with water. Two trials were carried out in which the participants first estimated the activities using their local standard protocols, and then repeated the measurements using a standardized acquisition and analysis protocol. Finally, processing of the imaging data from the second trial was repeated by a single centre using a fixed protocol. In the first trial, the activities were underestimated by about 15% with planar imaging. SPECT with Chang's first order attenuation correction (Chang-AC) and SPECT-CT overestimated the activity by about 10%. The second trial showed moderate improvements in accuracy and variability. Planar imaging was subject to methodological errors, e.g., in the use of a transmission scan for attenuation correction. The use of Chang-AC was subject to variability from the definition of phantom contours. The project demonstrated the need for training and standardized protocols to achieve good levels of quantitative accuracy and precision in a multicentre setting. Absolute quantification of simple objects with no background was possible with the strictest protocol to about 6% with planar imaging and SPECT (with Chang-AC) and within 2% for SPECT-CT. Eine genaue

KW - Comparison

KW - Planar

KW - Planar

KW - Quantitative Bildgebung

KW - Quantitative imaging

KW - SPECT

KW - SPECT

KW - Vergleichsstudie

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963811404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963811404&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.zemedi.2016.03.008

DO - 10.1016/j.zemedi.2016.03.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 27105765

AN - SCOPUS:84963811404

JO - Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik

JF - Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik

SN - 0939-3889

ER -