Msaternal report of advice received for infant care

Staci R. Eisenberg, Megan H. Bair-Merritt, Eve R. Colson, Timothy C. Heeren, Nicole L. Geller, Michael J. Corwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Advice has been associated with increased adherence to recommended infant care abstract practices, and may represent a modifiable factor to promote infant health. METHODS:A stratified, 2-stage, clustered design, with oversampling of black and Hispanic mothers, was used to survey a nationally representative sample of 1031 mothers of infants aged 2 to 6 months. Survey questions assessed advice received from doctors, birth hospital nurses, family, and media regarding immunization, breastfeeding, sleep position, sleep location, and pacifier use. Weighted frequencies of no advice and advice consistent with recommendations were calculated to obtain prevalence estimates. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with receipt of recommendation consistent advice. RESULTS: Although doctors were the most prevalent source of reported advice, ?20% of mothers reported no doctor advice for breastfeeding or sleep position, and more than 50% reported no advice regarding sleep location or pacifier use. Reported advice from nurses was generally similar to doctors. The prevalence of any advice from family or media was 20% to 56% for nearly all care practices, and advice given was often inconsistent with recommendations. The only factors that were consistently associated with receipt of recommendation consistent advice were race/ethnicity and parity; black and Hispanic mothers and first-time mothers were more likely to report recommendation consistent advice. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers commonly report receiving either no advice or recommendation inconsistent advice from each of the 4 sources we studied. By identifying care practices with low prevalence of recommendation consistent advice from potentially important advisors, our findings highlight opportunities for future intervention.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e315-e322
JournalPediatrics
Volume136
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Infant Care
Mothers
Sleep
Pacifiers
Breast Feeding
Hispanic Americans
Nurses
Parity
Immunization
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Parturition

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Eisenberg, S. R., Bair-Merritt, M. H., Colson, E. R., Heeren, T. C., Geller, N. L., & Corwin, M. J. (2015). Msaternal report of advice received for infant care. Pediatrics, 136(2), e315-e322. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-0551

Msaternal report of advice received for infant care. / Eisenberg, Staci R.; Bair-Merritt, Megan H.; Colson, Eve R.; Heeren, Timothy C.; Geller, Nicole L.; Corwin, Michael J.

In: Pediatrics, Vol. 136, No. 2, 01.08.2015, p. e315-e322.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eisenberg, SR, Bair-Merritt, MH, Colson, ER, Heeren, TC, Geller, NL & Corwin, MJ 2015, 'Msaternal report of advice received for infant care', Pediatrics, vol. 136, no. 2, pp. e315-e322. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-0551
Eisenberg SR, Bair-Merritt MH, Colson ER, Heeren TC, Geller NL, Corwin MJ. Msaternal report of advice received for infant care. Pediatrics. 2015 Aug 1;136(2):e315-e322. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-0551
Eisenberg, Staci R. ; Bair-Merritt, Megan H. ; Colson, Eve R. ; Heeren, Timothy C. ; Geller, Nicole L. ; Corwin, Michael J. / Msaternal report of advice received for infant care. In: Pediatrics. 2015 ; Vol. 136, No. 2. pp. e315-e322.
@article{c79959b3bcde4f63b7804e4bd24795b9,
title = "Msaternal report of advice received for infant care",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Advice has been associated with increased adherence to recommended infant care abstract practices, and may represent a modifiable factor to promote infant health. METHODS:A stratified, 2-stage, clustered design, with oversampling of black and Hispanic mothers, was used to survey a nationally representative sample of 1031 mothers of infants aged 2 to 6 months. Survey questions assessed advice received from doctors, birth hospital nurses, family, and media regarding immunization, breastfeeding, sleep position, sleep location, and pacifier use. Weighted frequencies of no advice and advice consistent with recommendations were calculated to obtain prevalence estimates. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with receipt of recommendation consistent advice. RESULTS: Although doctors were the most prevalent source of reported advice, ?20{\%} of mothers reported no doctor advice for breastfeeding or sleep position, and more than 50{\%} reported no advice regarding sleep location or pacifier use. Reported advice from nurses was generally similar to doctors. The prevalence of any advice from family or media was 20{\%} to 56{\%} for nearly all care practices, and advice given was often inconsistent with recommendations. The only factors that were consistently associated with receipt of recommendation consistent advice were race/ethnicity and parity; black and Hispanic mothers and first-time mothers were more likely to report recommendation consistent advice. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers commonly report receiving either no advice or recommendation inconsistent advice from each of the 4 sources we studied. By identifying care practices with low prevalence of recommendation consistent advice from potentially important advisors, our findings highlight opportunities for future intervention.",
author = "Eisenberg, {Staci R.} and Bair-Merritt, {Megan H.} and Colson, {Eve R.} and Heeren, {Timothy C.} and Geller, {Nicole L.} and Corwin, {Michael J.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1542/peds.2015-0551",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "136",
pages = "e315--e322",
journal = "Pediatrics",
issn = "0031-4005",
publisher = "American Academy of Pediatrics",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Msaternal report of advice received for infant care

AU - Eisenberg, Staci R.

AU - Bair-Merritt, Megan H.

AU - Colson, Eve R.

AU - Heeren, Timothy C.

AU - Geller, Nicole L.

AU - Corwin, Michael J.

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Advice has been associated with increased adherence to recommended infant care abstract practices, and may represent a modifiable factor to promote infant health. METHODS:A stratified, 2-stage, clustered design, with oversampling of black and Hispanic mothers, was used to survey a nationally representative sample of 1031 mothers of infants aged 2 to 6 months. Survey questions assessed advice received from doctors, birth hospital nurses, family, and media regarding immunization, breastfeeding, sleep position, sleep location, and pacifier use. Weighted frequencies of no advice and advice consistent with recommendations were calculated to obtain prevalence estimates. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with receipt of recommendation consistent advice. RESULTS: Although doctors were the most prevalent source of reported advice, ?20% of mothers reported no doctor advice for breastfeeding or sleep position, and more than 50% reported no advice regarding sleep location or pacifier use. Reported advice from nurses was generally similar to doctors. The prevalence of any advice from family or media was 20% to 56% for nearly all care practices, and advice given was often inconsistent with recommendations. The only factors that were consistently associated with receipt of recommendation consistent advice were race/ethnicity and parity; black and Hispanic mothers and first-time mothers were more likely to report recommendation consistent advice. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers commonly report receiving either no advice or recommendation inconsistent advice from each of the 4 sources we studied. By identifying care practices with low prevalence of recommendation consistent advice from potentially important advisors, our findings highlight opportunities for future intervention.

AB - BACKGROUND: Advice has been associated with increased adherence to recommended infant care abstract practices, and may represent a modifiable factor to promote infant health. METHODS:A stratified, 2-stage, clustered design, with oversampling of black and Hispanic mothers, was used to survey a nationally representative sample of 1031 mothers of infants aged 2 to 6 months. Survey questions assessed advice received from doctors, birth hospital nurses, family, and media regarding immunization, breastfeeding, sleep position, sleep location, and pacifier use. Weighted frequencies of no advice and advice consistent with recommendations were calculated to obtain prevalence estimates. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess factors associated with receipt of recommendation consistent advice. RESULTS: Although doctors were the most prevalent source of reported advice, ?20% of mothers reported no doctor advice for breastfeeding or sleep position, and more than 50% reported no advice regarding sleep location or pacifier use. Reported advice from nurses was generally similar to doctors. The prevalence of any advice from family or media was 20% to 56% for nearly all care practices, and advice given was often inconsistent with recommendations. The only factors that were consistently associated with receipt of recommendation consistent advice were race/ethnicity and parity; black and Hispanic mothers and first-time mothers were more likely to report recommendation consistent advice. CONCLUSIONS: Mothers commonly report receiving either no advice or recommendation inconsistent advice from each of the 4 sources we studied. By identifying care practices with low prevalence of recommendation consistent advice from potentially important advisors, our findings highlight opportunities for future intervention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938861852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938861852&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1542/peds.2015-0551

DO - 10.1542/peds.2015-0551

M3 - Article

C2 - 26216322

AN - SCOPUS:84938861852

VL - 136

SP - e315-e322

JO - Pediatrics

JF - Pediatrics

SN - 0031-4005

IS - 2

ER -