MR of cervical lymph nodes: Comparison of fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo T2W scans

David Mark Yousem, R. W. Hurst

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: In order to explore the utility of fast spin-echo techniques in the neck, 50 consecutive conventional spin-echo (CSE) long TR examinations were compared with 50 consecutive fast spin-echo (FSE) long TR scans for cervical lymph nodes. Materials and Methods: Standard CSE examinations used parameters of 2200/80/1 (TR/TE/ excitations), 256 x 128 matrix, 5 mm thick with interslice gaps between 1 and 2.5 mm. FSE studies were employed with TR of 4000/80/2, 256 x 192 matrix, fat suppression and 5 mm contiguous slices. Standard T1-weighted examinations and clinical correlation were used as proof of nodal presence. Results: Overall vascular flow artefacts, patient motion artefacts, and image quality were comparable between the two techniques. Lymph node detectability as superior with FSE scans (P <0.05). Typical time saved was approximately 4.5 min with FSE, despite the use of larger matrices, contiguous slices and twice the excitations. Conclusion: FSE is a competitive technique to CSE images in the neck, yielding similar quality images with higher resolution, reduced scan time, and improved lymph node detectability.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)670-675
Number of pages6
JournalClinical Radiology
Volume49
Issue number10
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lymph Nodes
Artifacts
Neck
Blood Vessels
Fats

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

MR of cervical lymph nodes : Comparison of fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo T2W scans. / Yousem, David Mark; Hurst, R. W.

In: Clinical Radiology, Vol. 49, No. 10, 1994, p. 670-675.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c7a9bdf645874a04a6debaa57bc76c71,
title = "MR of cervical lymph nodes: Comparison of fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo T2W scans",
abstract = "Purpose: In order to explore the utility of fast spin-echo techniques in the neck, 50 consecutive conventional spin-echo (CSE) long TR examinations were compared with 50 consecutive fast spin-echo (FSE) long TR scans for cervical lymph nodes. Materials and Methods: Standard CSE examinations used parameters of 2200/80/1 (TR/TE/ excitations), 256 x 128 matrix, 5 mm thick with interslice gaps between 1 and 2.5 mm. FSE studies were employed with TR of 4000/80/2, 256 x 192 matrix, fat suppression and 5 mm contiguous slices. Standard T1-weighted examinations and clinical correlation were used as proof of nodal presence. Results: Overall vascular flow artefacts, patient motion artefacts, and image quality were comparable between the two techniques. Lymph node detectability as superior with FSE scans (P <0.05). Typical time saved was approximately 4.5 min with FSE, despite the use of larger matrices, contiguous slices and twice the excitations. Conclusion: FSE is a competitive technique to CSE images in the neck, yielding similar quality images with higher resolution, reduced scan time, and improved lymph node detectability.",
author = "Yousem, {David Mark} and Hurst, {R. W.}",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "670--675",
journal = "Clinical Radiology",
issn = "0009-9260",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MR of cervical lymph nodes

T2 - Comparison of fast spin-echo and conventional spin-echo T2W scans

AU - Yousem, David Mark

AU - Hurst, R. W.

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Purpose: In order to explore the utility of fast spin-echo techniques in the neck, 50 consecutive conventional spin-echo (CSE) long TR examinations were compared with 50 consecutive fast spin-echo (FSE) long TR scans for cervical lymph nodes. Materials and Methods: Standard CSE examinations used parameters of 2200/80/1 (TR/TE/ excitations), 256 x 128 matrix, 5 mm thick with interslice gaps between 1 and 2.5 mm. FSE studies were employed with TR of 4000/80/2, 256 x 192 matrix, fat suppression and 5 mm contiguous slices. Standard T1-weighted examinations and clinical correlation were used as proof of nodal presence. Results: Overall vascular flow artefacts, patient motion artefacts, and image quality were comparable between the two techniques. Lymph node detectability as superior with FSE scans (P <0.05). Typical time saved was approximately 4.5 min with FSE, despite the use of larger matrices, contiguous slices and twice the excitations. Conclusion: FSE is a competitive technique to CSE images in the neck, yielding similar quality images with higher resolution, reduced scan time, and improved lymph node detectability.

AB - Purpose: In order to explore the utility of fast spin-echo techniques in the neck, 50 consecutive conventional spin-echo (CSE) long TR examinations were compared with 50 consecutive fast spin-echo (FSE) long TR scans for cervical lymph nodes. Materials and Methods: Standard CSE examinations used parameters of 2200/80/1 (TR/TE/ excitations), 256 x 128 matrix, 5 mm thick with interslice gaps between 1 and 2.5 mm. FSE studies were employed with TR of 4000/80/2, 256 x 192 matrix, fat suppression and 5 mm contiguous slices. Standard T1-weighted examinations and clinical correlation were used as proof of nodal presence. Results: Overall vascular flow artefacts, patient motion artefacts, and image quality were comparable between the two techniques. Lymph node detectability as superior with FSE scans (P <0.05). Typical time saved was approximately 4.5 min with FSE, despite the use of larger matrices, contiguous slices and twice the excitations. Conclusion: FSE is a competitive technique to CSE images in the neck, yielding similar quality images with higher resolution, reduced scan time, and improved lymph node detectability.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028060551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028060551&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7955826

AN - SCOPUS:0028060551

VL - 49

SP - 670

EP - 675

JO - Clinical Radiology

JF - Clinical Radiology

SN - 0009-9260

IS - 10

ER -