MR imaging for predicting neoplastic invasion of the cervical esophagus

S. Roychowdhury, L. A. Loevner, David Mark Yousem, A. Chalian, K. T. Montone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Esophageal invasion (EI) by head and neck neoplasm has important prognostic and surgical management implications. Our purpose was to determine the accuracy of MR imaging for predicting neoplastic cervical esophageal invasion. METHODS: MR scans of the neck obtained from 22 patients with periesophageal masses were retrospectively reviewed independently and by consensus by two experienced head and neck radiologists who were unaware of surgical findings. The patients were selected from clinical, radiologic, or pathologic reports suggesting EI. The following imaging criteria for EI were evaluated: effacement of periesophageal fat planes, circumferential mass, paraesophageal lymph nodes, luminal size, wall thickening, increased T2 wall signal, and wall enhancement. There were eight patients with EI and 14 patients without EI, as confirmed by surgical findings or pathologic examination. RESULTS: The consensus criteria with the best sensitivities were any wall thickening (100%), effaced fat plane (100%), and any T2 wall signal abnormality (100%). The criteria with the best specificities were circumferential mass greater than 270 (100%) or 180 degrees (93%) and focal T2 wall signal abnormality (86%). The overall kappa value for the two readers for all criteria was 0.57 (moderate agreement). CONCLUSION: A circumferential mass or focal T2 signal abnormality on the esophageal wall suggests the presence of EI. An intact fat plane, absence of wall thickening, and no T2 wall signal abnormalities imply that the esophagus is not invaded.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1681-1687
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume21
Issue number9
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Esophagus
Fats
Neck
Head and Neck Neoplasms
Lymph Nodes
Head

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Cite this

Roychowdhury, S., Loevner, L. A., Yousem, D. M., Chalian, A., & Montone, K. T. (2000). MR imaging for predicting neoplastic invasion of the cervical esophagus. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 21(9), 1681-1687.

MR imaging for predicting neoplastic invasion of the cervical esophagus. / Roychowdhury, S.; Loevner, L. A.; Yousem, David Mark; Chalian, A.; Montone, K. T.

In: American Journal of Neuroradiology, Vol. 21, No. 9, 2000, p. 1681-1687.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Roychowdhury, S, Loevner, LA, Yousem, DM, Chalian, A & Montone, KT 2000, 'MR imaging for predicting neoplastic invasion of the cervical esophagus', American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1681-1687.
Roychowdhury, S. ; Loevner, L. A. ; Yousem, David Mark ; Chalian, A. ; Montone, K. T. / MR imaging for predicting neoplastic invasion of the cervical esophagus. In: American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2000 ; Vol. 21, No. 9. pp. 1681-1687.
@article{0baac91a9c5940bea96f1935edddf3b3,
title = "MR imaging for predicting neoplastic invasion of the cervical esophagus",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Esophageal invasion (EI) by head and neck neoplasm has important prognostic and surgical management implications. Our purpose was to determine the accuracy of MR imaging for predicting neoplastic cervical esophageal invasion. METHODS: MR scans of the neck obtained from 22 patients with periesophageal masses were retrospectively reviewed independently and by consensus by two experienced head and neck radiologists who were unaware of surgical findings. The patients were selected from clinical, radiologic, or pathologic reports suggesting EI. The following imaging criteria for EI were evaluated: effacement of periesophageal fat planes, circumferential mass, paraesophageal lymph nodes, luminal size, wall thickening, increased T2 wall signal, and wall enhancement. There were eight patients with EI and 14 patients without EI, as confirmed by surgical findings or pathologic examination. RESULTS: The consensus criteria with the best sensitivities were any wall thickening (100{\%}), effaced fat plane (100{\%}), and any T2 wall signal abnormality (100{\%}). The criteria with the best specificities were circumferential mass greater than 270 (100{\%}) or 180 degrees (93{\%}) and focal T2 wall signal abnormality (86{\%}). The overall kappa value for the two readers for all criteria was 0.57 (moderate agreement). CONCLUSION: A circumferential mass or focal T2 signal abnormality on the esophageal wall suggests the presence of EI. An intact fat plane, absence of wall thickening, and no T2 wall signal abnormalities imply that the esophagus is not invaded.",
author = "S. Roychowdhury and Loevner, {L. A.} and Yousem, {David Mark} and A. Chalian and Montone, {K. T.}",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "1681--1687",
journal = "American Journal of Neuroradiology",
issn = "0195-6108",
publisher = "American Society of Neuroradiology",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MR imaging for predicting neoplastic invasion of the cervical esophagus

AU - Roychowdhury, S.

AU - Loevner, L. A.

AU - Yousem, David Mark

AU - Chalian, A.

AU - Montone, K. T.

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Esophageal invasion (EI) by head and neck neoplasm has important prognostic and surgical management implications. Our purpose was to determine the accuracy of MR imaging for predicting neoplastic cervical esophageal invasion. METHODS: MR scans of the neck obtained from 22 patients with periesophageal masses were retrospectively reviewed independently and by consensus by two experienced head and neck radiologists who were unaware of surgical findings. The patients were selected from clinical, radiologic, or pathologic reports suggesting EI. The following imaging criteria for EI were evaluated: effacement of periesophageal fat planes, circumferential mass, paraesophageal lymph nodes, luminal size, wall thickening, increased T2 wall signal, and wall enhancement. There were eight patients with EI and 14 patients without EI, as confirmed by surgical findings or pathologic examination. RESULTS: The consensus criteria with the best sensitivities were any wall thickening (100%), effaced fat plane (100%), and any T2 wall signal abnormality (100%). The criteria with the best specificities were circumferential mass greater than 270 (100%) or 180 degrees (93%) and focal T2 wall signal abnormality (86%). The overall kappa value for the two readers for all criteria was 0.57 (moderate agreement). CONCLUSION: A circumferential mass or focal T2 signal abnormality on the esophageal wall suggests the presence of EI. An intact fat plane, absence of wall thickening, and no T2 wall signal abnormalities imply that the esophagus is not invaded.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Esophageal invasion (EI) by head and neck neoplasm has important prognostic and surgical management implications. Our purpose was to determine the accuracy of MR imaging for predicting neoplastic cervical esophageal invasion. METHODS: MR scans of the neck obtained from 22 patients with periesophageal masses were retrospectively reviewed independently and by consensus by two experienced head and neck radiologists who were unaware of surgical findings. The patients were selected from clinical, radiologic, or pathologic reports suggesting EI. The following imaging criteria for EI were evaluated: effacement of periesophageal fat planes, circumferential mass, paraesophageal lymph nodes, luminal size, wall thickening, increased T2 wall signal, and wall enhancement. There were eight patients with EI and 14 patients without EI, as confirmed by surgical findings or pathologic examination. RESULTS: The consensus criteria with the best sensitivities were any wall thickening (100%), effaced fat plane (100%), and any T2 wall signal abnormality (100%). The criteria with the best specificities were circumferential mass greater than 270 (100%) or 180 degrees (93%) and focal T2 wall signal abnormality (86%). The overall kappa value for the two readers for all criteria was 0.57 (moderate agreement). CONCLUSION: A circumferential mass or focal T2 signal abnormality on the esophageal wall suggests the presence of EI. An intact fat plane, absence of wall thickening, and no T2 wall signal abnormalities imply that the esophagus is not invaded.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033772129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033772129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 11039351

AN - SCOPUS:0033772129

VL - 21

SP - 1681

EP - 1687

JO - American Journal of Neuroradiology

JF - American Journal of Neuroradiology

SN - 0195-6108

IS - 9

ER -