MR and positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of surgically correctable temporal lobe epilepsy

R. Heinz, N. Ferris, E. K. Lee, R. Radtke, B. Crain, J. M. Hoffman, M. Hanson, S. Paine, A. Friedman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the association of an MR abnormality and a positron emission tomography (PET) abnormality with a good outcome in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy after lobectomy, the association of combined PET and MR findings with good outcomes after lobectomy, and MR and PET pathologic correlation. METHODS: MR and PET were performed on 27 patients in a blinded study. Histologic studies were correlated with foci of increased T2 signal. RESULTS: Increased signal or decreased volume of the hippocampus was noted in 13 of 15 patients with mesial temporal sclerosis. Twelve of 15 had positive PET findings. MR identified 20 (83%) of the 24 patients with good outcomes. PET identified 71%. When MR and PET were combined, they detected 95% of the patients with good outcome. Region of interest measurements of the hippocampus in 11 study patients and 7 control subjects documented a significant increase in signal in the patients with seizures. Histologic correlative studies demonstrated that increased T2 signals related to astrocytosis in the hippocampus and adjacent white matter. CONCLUSION: MR (increased signal and decreased volume of the hippocampus) significantly improved the capability to identify those persons who would be helped by lobectomy. MR sensitivity exceeded that of PET.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1341-1348
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology
Volume15
Issue number7
StatePublished - Jan 1 1994
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Clinical Neurology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'MR and positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of surgically correctable temporal lobe epilepsy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this