Motor learning interference is proportional to occlusion of LTP-like plasticity

Gabriela Cantarero, Byron Tang, Rebecca O'Malley, Rachel Salas, Pablo A Celnik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Learning interference occurs when learning something new causes forgetting of an older memory (retrograde interference) or when learning a new task disrupts learning of a second subsequent task (anterograde interference). This phenomenon, described in cognitive, sensory, and motor domains, limits our ability to learn multiple tasks in close succession. It has been suggested that the source of interference is competition of neural resources, although the neuronal mechanisms are unknown. Learning induces long-term potentiation (LTP), which can ultimately limit the ability to induce further LTP, a phenomenon known as occlusion. In humans we quantified the magnitude of occlusion of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation-induced increased excitability after learning a skill task as an index of the amount of LTP-like plasticity used. We found that retention of a newly acquired skill, as reflected by performance in the second day of practice, is proportional to the magnitude of occlusion. Moreover, the degree of behavioral interference was correlated with the magnitude of occlusion. Individuals with larger occlusion after learning the first skill were (1) more resilient to retrograde interference and (2) experienced larger anterograde interference when training a second task, as expressed by decreased performance of the learned skill in the second day of practice. This effect was not observed if sufficient time elapsed between training the two skills and LTP-like occlusion was not present. These findings suggest competition of LTP-like plasticity is a factor that limits the ability to remember multiple tasks trained in close succession.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)4634-4641
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Neuroscience
Volume33
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 13 2013

Fingerprint

Long-Term Potentiation
Learning
Aptitude

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Motor learning interference is proportional to occlusion of LTP-like plasticity. / Cantarero, Gabriela; Tang, Byron; O'Malley, Rebecca; Salas, Rachel; Celnik, Pablo A.

In: Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 33, No. 11, 13.03.2013, p. 4634-4641.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ff4e7c6f7ee34f59b4d2ae64cc7a5e58,
title = "Motor learning interference is proportional to occlusion of LTP-like plasticity",
abstract = "Learning interference occurs when learning something new causes forgetting of an older memory (retrograde interference) or when learning a new task disrupts learning of a second subsequent task (anterograde interference). This phenomenon, described in cognitive, sensory, and motor domains, limits our ability to learn multiple tasks in close succession. It has been suggested that the source of interference is competition of neural resources, although the neuronal mechanisms are unknown. Learning induces long-term potentiation (LTP), which can ultimately limit the ability to induce further LTP, a phenomenon known as occlusion. In humans we quantified the magnitude of occlusion of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation-induced increased excitability after learning a skill task as an index of the amount of LTP-like plasticity used. We found that retention of a newly acquired skill, as reflected by performance in the second day of practice, is proportional to the magnitude of occlusion. Moreover, the degree of behavioral interference was correlated with the magnitude of occlusion. Individuals with larger occlusion after learning the first skill were (1) more resilient to retrograde interference and (2) experienced larger anterograde interference when training a second task, as expressed by decreased performance of the learned skill in the second day of practice. This effect was not observed if sufficient time elapsed between training the two skills and LTP-like occlusion was not present. These findings suggest competition of LTP-like plasticity is a factor that limits the ability to remember multiple tasks trained in close succession.",
author = "Gabriela Cantarero and Byron Tang and Rebecca O'Malley and Rachel Salas and Celnik, {Pablo A}",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4706-12.2013",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "4634--4641",
journal = "Journal of Neuroscience",
issn = "0270-6474",
publisher = "Society for Neuroscience",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motor learning interference is proportional to occlusion of LTP-like plasticity

AU - Cantarero, Gabriela

AU - Tang, Byron

AU - O'Malley, Rebecca

AU - Salas, Rachel

AU - Celnik, Pablo A

PY - 2013/3/13

Y1 - 2013/3/13

N2 - Learning interference occurs when learning something new causes forgetting of an older memory (retrograde interference) or when learning a new task disrupts learning of a second subsequent task (anterograde interference). This phenomenon, described in cognitive, sensory, and motor domains, limits our ability to learn multiple tasks in close succession. It has been suggested that the source of interference is competition of neural resources, although the neuronal mechanisms are unknown. Learning induces long-term potentiation (LTP), which can ultimately limit the ability to induce further LTP, a phenomenon known as occlusion. In humans we quantified the magnitude of occlusion of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation-induced increased excitability after learning a skill task as an index of the amount of LTP-like plasticity used. We found that retention of a newly acquired skill, as reflected by performance in the second day of practice, is proportional to the magnitude of occlusion. Moreover, the degree of behavioral interference was correlated with the magnitude of occlusion. Individuals with larger occlusion after learning the first skill were (1) more resilient to retrograde interference and (2) experienced larger anterograde interference when training a second task, as expressed by decreased performance of the learned skill in the second day of practice. This effect was not observed if sufficient time elapsed between training the two skills and LTP-like occlusion was not present. These findings suggest competition of LTP-like plasticity is a factor that limits the ability to remember multiple tasks trained in close succession.

AB - Learning interference occurs when learning something new causes forgetting of an older memory (retrograde interference) or when learning a new task disrupts learning of a second subsequent task (anterograde interference). This phenomenon, described in cognitive, sensory, and motor domains, limits our ability to learn multiple tasks in close succession. It has been suggested that the source of interference is competition of neural resources, although the neuronal mechanisms are unknown. Learning induces long-term potentiation (LTP), which can ultimately limit the ability to induce further LTP, a phenomenon known as occlusion. In humans we quantified the magnitude of occlusion of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation-induced increased excitability after learning a skill task as an index of the amount of LTP-like plasticity used. We found that retention of a newly acquired skill, as reflected by performance in the second day of practice, is proportional to the magnitude of occlusion. Moreover, the degree of behavioral interference was correlated with the magnitude of occlusion. Individuals with larger occlusion after learning the first skill were (1) more resilient to retrograde interference and (2) experienced larger anterograde interference when training a second task, as expressed by decreased performance of the learned skill in the second day of practice. This effect was not observed if sufficient time elapsed between training the two skills and LTP-like occlusion was not present. These findings suggest competition of LTP-like plasticity is a factor that limits the ability to remember multiple tasks trained in close succession.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84874883560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84874883560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4706-12.2013

DO - 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4706-12.2013

M3 - Article

C2 - 23486938

AN - SCOPUS:84874883560

VL - 33

SP - 4634

EP - 4641

JO - Journal of Neuroscience

JF - Journal of Neuroscience

SN - 0270-6474

IS - 11

ER -