Motor Learning in Stroke

Robert M. Hardwick, Vikram A. Rajan, Amy J. Bastian, John W. Krakauer, Pablo A. Celnik

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and Objective: Stroke rehabilitation assumes motor learning contributes to motor recovery, yet motor learning in stroke has received little systematic investigation. Here we aimed to illustrate that despite matching levels of performance on a task, a trained patient should not be considered equal to an untrained patient with less impairment. Methods: We examined motor learning in healthy control participants and groups of stroke survivors with mild-to-moderate or moderate-to-severe motor impairment. Participants performed a series of isometric contractions of the elbow flexors to navigate an on-screen cursor to different targets, and trained to perform this task over a 4-day period. The speed-accuracy trade-off function (SAF) was assessed for each group, controlling for differences in self-selected movement speeds between individuals. Results: The initial SAF for each group was proportional to their impairment. All groups were able to improve their performance through skill acquisition. Interestingly, training led the moderate-to-severe group to match the untrained (baseline) performance of the mild-to-moderate group, while the trained mild-to-moderate group matched the untrained (baseline) performance of the controls. Critically, this did not make the two groups equivalent; they differed in their capacity to improve beyond this matched performance level. Specifically, the trained groups had reached a plateau, while the untrained groups had not. Conclusions: Despite matching levels of performance on a task, a trained patient is not equal to an untrained patient with less impairment. This has important implications for decisions both on the focus of rehabilitation efforts for chronic stroke, as well as for returning to work and other activities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)178-189
Number of pages12
JournalNeurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Learning
Rehabilitation
Isometric Contraction
Elbow
Survivors
Healthy Volunteers
Research Design

Keywords

  • hemiparesis
  • motor activity
  • motor control
  • motor disorders
  • motor impairment
  • motor skills
  • motor skills disorders
  • speed-accuracy trade-off

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Motor Learning in Stroke. / Hardwick, Robert M.; Rajan, Vikram A.; Bastian, Amy J.; Krakauer, John W.; Celnik, Pablo A.

In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2017, p. 178-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hardwick, Robert M.; Rajan, Vikram A.; Bastian, Amy J.; Krakauer, John W.; Celnik, Pablo A. / Motor Learning in Stroke.

In: Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, Vol. 31, No. 2, 2017, p. 178-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8f80f8790f57457994b727b745f7a5bf,
title = "Motor Learning in Stroke",
abstract = "Background and Objective: Stroke rehabilitation assumes motor learning contributes to motor recovery, yet motor learning in stroke has received little systematic investigation. Here we aimed to illustrate that despite matching levels of performance on a task, a trained patient should not be considered equal to an untrained patient with less impairment. Methods: We examined motor learning in healthy control participants and groups of stroke survivors with mild-to-moderate or moderate-to-severe motor impairment. Participants performed a series of isometric contractions of the elbow flexors to navigate an on-screen cursor to different targets, and trained to perform this task over a 4-day period. The speed-accuracy trade-off function (SAF) was assessed for each group, controlling for differences in self-selected movement speeds between individuals. Results: The initial SAF for each group was proportional to their impairment. All groups were able to improve their performance through skill acquisition. Interestingly, training led the moderate-to-severe group to match the untrained (baseline) performance of the mild-to-moderate group, while the trained mild-to-moderate group matched the untrained (baseline) performance of the controls. Critically, this did not make the two groups equivalent; they differed in their capacity to improve beyond this matched performance level. Specifically, the trained groups had reached a plateau, while the untrained groups had not. Conclusions: Despite matching levels of performance on a task, a trained patient is not equal to an untrained patient with less impairment. This has important implications for decisions both on the focus of rehabilitation efforts for chronic stroke, as well as for returning to work and other activities.",
keywords = "hemiparesis, motor activity, motor control, motor disorders, motor impairment, motor skills, motor skills disorders, speed-accuracy trade-off",
author = "Hardwick, {Robert M.} and Rajan, {Vikram A.} and Bastian, {Amy J.} and Krakauer, {John W.} and Celnik, {Pablo A.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1177/1545968316675432",
volume = "31",
pages = "178--189",
journal = "Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair",
issn = "1545-9683",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motor Learning in Stroke

AU - Hardwick,Robert M.

AU - Rajan,Vikram A.

AU - Bastian,Amy J.

AU - Krakauer,John W.

AU - Celnik,Pablo A.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Background and Objective: Stroke rehabilitation assumes motor learning contributes to motor recovery, yet motor learning in stroke has received little systematic investigation. Here we aimed to illustrate that despite matching levels of performance on a task, a trained patient should not be considered equal to an untrained patient with less impairment. Methods: We examined motor learning in healthy control participants and groups of stroke survivors with mild-to-moderate or moderate-to-severe motor impairment. Participants performed a series of isometric contractions of the elbow flexors to navigate an on-screen cursor to different targets, and trained to perform this task over a 4-day period. The speed-accuracy trade-off function (SAF) was assessed for each group, controlling for differences in self-selected movement speeds between individuals. Results: The initial SAF for each group was proportional to their impairment. All groups were able to improve their performance through skill acquisition. Interestingly, training led the moderate-to-severe group to match the untrained (baseline) performance of the mild-to-moderate group, while the trained mild-to-moderate group matched the untrained (baseline) performance of the controls. Critically, this did not make the two groups equivalent; they differed in their capacity to improve beyond this matched performance level. Specifically, the trained groups had reached a plateau, while the untrained groups had not. Conclusions: Despite matching levels of performance on a task, a trained patient is not equal to an untrained patient with less impairment. This has important implications for decisions both on the focus of rehabilitation efforts for chronic stroke, as well as for returning to work and other activities.

AB - Background and Objective: Stroke rehabilitation assumes motor learning contributes to motor recovery, yet motor learning in stroke has received little systematic investigation. Here we aimed to illustrate that despite matching levels of performance on a task, a trained patient should not be considered equal to an untrained patient with less impairment. Methods: We examined motor learning in healthy control participants and groups of stroke survivors with mild-to-moderate or moderate-to-severe motor impairment. Participants performed a series of isometric contractions of the elbow flexors to navigate an on-screen cursor to different targets, and trained to perform this task over a 4-day period. The speed-accuracy trade-off function (SAF) was assessed for each group, controlling for differences in self-selected movement speeds between individuals. Results: The initial SAF for each group was proportional to their impairment. All groups were able to improve their performance through skill acquisition. Interestingly, training led the moderate-to-severe group to match the untrained (baseline) performance of the mild-to-moderate group, while the trained mild-to-moderate group matched the untrained (baseline) performance of the controls. Critically, this did not make the two groups equivalent; they differed in their capacity to improve beyond this matched performance level. Specifically, the trained groups had reached a plateau, while the untrained groups had not. Conclusions: Despite matching levels of performance on a task, a trained patient is not equal to an untrained patient with less impairment. This has important implications for decisions both on the focus of rehabilitation efforts for chronic stroke, as well as for returning to work and other activities.

KW - hemiparesis

KW - motor activity

KW - motor control

KW - motor disorders

KW - motor impairment

KW - motor skills

KW - motor skills disorders

KW - speed-accuracy trade-off

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011631332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85011631332&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1545968316675432

DO - 10.1177/1545968316675432

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 178

EP - 189

JO - Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

T2 - Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

JF - Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

SN - 1545-9683

IS - 2

ER -