Motion of a cadaver model of cervical injury during endotracheal intubation with a Bullard laryngoscope or a Macintosh blade with and without in-line stabilization

Christopher R. Turner, Jessica Block, Amy Shanks, Michelle Morris, Keith R. Lodhia, Sachin K Gujar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Endotracheal intubation in patients with potential cervical injury is a common dilemma in trauma. Although direct laryngoscopy (DL) with manual in-line stabilization (MILS) is a standard technique there is little data on the effect of MILS on cervical motion. Likewise there is little data available regarding alternative airway techniques in this setting. This study compared intubations with and without MILS in a cadaver model of cervical instability. We also used this model to compare intubations using DL with a Macintosh blade versus a Bullard laryngoscope (BL). Methods: Complete C4-C5 disarticulations were surgically created in 10 fresh human cadavers. The cadavers were then intubated in a random order with either BL or DL with and without MILS. The motion at the unstable interspace was measured for subluxation, angulation, and distraction. Results: MILS did not significantly affect maximal motion of this model in any of the three measures using either DL or BL. There were no clinically significant differences in maximal median motion in any of the three measures when comparing the two blades. However, there was significantly more variance in the subluxation caused by DL than by BL. Conclusions: We were unable to demonstrate any significant effect of MILS on the motion of an unstable cervical spine in this cadaver model. The BL appears to be a viable alternative to DL in the setting of an unstable lower cervical spine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)61-66
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume67
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Laryngoscopes
Laryngoscopy
Intratracheal Intubation
Cadaver
Wounds and Injuries
Intubation
Spine
Disarticulation

Keywords

  • Airway equipment
  • Cervical spine injury
  • Cervical spine instability
  • Endotracheal intubation
  • Endotracheal intubation techniques

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cite this

Motion of a cadaver model of cervical injury during endotracheal intubation with a Bullard laryngoscope or a Macintosh blade with and without in-line stabilization. / Turner, Christopher R.; Block, Jessica; Shanks, Amy; Morris, Michelle; Lodhia, Keith R.; Gujar, Sachin K.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2009, p. 61-66.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8c572aeab9714de0840ba7a7e30a73b5,
title = "Motion of a cadaver model of cervical injury during endotracheal intubation with a Bullard laryngoscope or a Macintosh blade with and without in-line stabilization",
abstract = "Background: Endotracheal intubation in patients with potential cervical injury is a common dilemma in trauma. Although direct laryngoscopy (DL) with manual in-line stabilization (MILS) is a standard technique there is little data on the effect of MILS on cervical motion. Likewise there is little data available regarding alternative airway techniques in this setting. This study compared intubations with and without MILS in a cadaver model of cervical instability. We also used this model to compare intubations using DL with a Macintosh blade versus a Bullard laryngoscope (BL). Methods: Complete C4-C5 disarticulations were surgically created in 10 fresh human cadavers. The cadavers were then intubated in a random order with either BL or DL with and without MILS. The motion at the unstable interspace was measured for subluxation, angulation, and distraction. Results: MILS did not significantly affect maximal motion of this model in any of the three measures using either DL or BL. There were no clinically significant differences in maximal median motion in any of the three measures when comparing the two blades. However, there was significantly more variance in the subluxation caused by DL than by BL. Conclusions: We were unable to demonstrate any significant effect of MILS on the motion of an unstable cervical spine in this cadaver model. The BL appears to be a viable alternative to DL in the setting of an unstable lower cervical spine.",
keywords = "Airway equipment, Cervical spine injury, Cervical spine instability, Endotracheal intubation, Endotracheal intubation techniques",
author = "Turner, {Christopher R.} and Jessica Block and Amy Shanks and Michelle Morris and Lodhia, {Keith R.} and Gujar, {Sachin K}",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1097/TA.0b013e318182afa8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "61--66",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Motion of a cadaver model of cervical injury during endotracheal intubation with a Bullard laryngoscope or a Macintosh blade with and without in-line stabilization

AU - Turner, Christopher R.

AU - Block, Jessica

AU - Shanks, Amy

AU - Morris, Michelle

AU - Lodhia, Keith R.

AU - Gujar, Sachin K

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Background: Endotracheal intubation in patients with potential cervical injury is a common dilemma in trauma. Although direct laryngoscopy (DL) with manual in-line stabilization (MILS) is a standard technique there is little data on the effect of MILS on cervical motion. Likewise there is little data available regarding alternative airway techniques in this setting. This study compared intubations with and without MILS in a cadaver model of cervical instability. We also used this model to compare intubations using DL with a Macintosh blade versus a Bullard laryngoscope (BL). Methods: Complete C4-C5 disarticulations were surgically created in 10 fresh human cadavers. The cadavers were then intubated in a random order with either BL or DL with and without MILS. The motion at the unstable interspace was measured for subluxation, angulation, and distraction. Results: MILS did not significantly affect maximal motion of this model in any of the three measures using either DL or BL. There were no clinically significant differences in maximal median motion in any of the three measures when comparing the two blades. However, there was significantly more variance in the subluxation caused by DL than by BL. Conclusions: We were unable to demonstrate any significant effect of MILS on the motion of an unstable cervical spine in this cadaver model. The BL appears to be a viable alternative to DL in the setting of an unstable lower cervical spine.

AB - Background: Endotracheal intubation in patients with potential cervical injury is a common dilemma in trauma. Although direct laryngoscopy (DL) with manual in-line stabilization (MILS) is a standard technique there is little data on the effect of MILS on cervical motion. Likewise there is little data available regarding alternative airway techniques in this setting. This study compared intubations with and without MILS in a cadaver model of cervical instability. We also used this model to compare intubations using DL with a Macintosh blade versus a Bullard laryngoscope (BL). Methods: Complete C4-C5 disarticulations were surgically created in 10 fresh human cadavers. The cadavers were then intubated in a random order with either BL or DL with and without MILS. The motion at the unstable interspace was measured for subluxation, angulation, and distraction. Results: MILS did not significantly affect maximal motion of this model in any of the three measures using either DL or BL. There were no clinically significant differences in maximal median motion in any of the three measures when comparing the two blades. However, there was significantly more variance in the subluxation caused by DL than by BL. Conclusions: We were unable to demonstrate any significant effect of MILS on the motion of an unstable cervical spine in this cadaver model. The BL appears to be a viable alternative to DL in the setting of an unstable lower cervical spine.

KW - Airway equipment

KW - Cervical spine injury

KW - Cervical spine instability

KW - Endotracheal intubation

KW - Endotracheal intubation techniques

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350447613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350447613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TA.0b013e318182afa8

DO - 10.1097/TA.0b013e318182afa8

M3 - Article

C2 - 19590309

AN - SCOPUS:70350447613

VL - 67

SP - 61

EP - 66

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -