More attention when speaking: Does it help or does it hurt?

Nazbanou Nozari, Sharon L. Thompson-Schill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Paying selective attention to a word in a multi-word utterance results in a decreased probability of error on that word (benefit), but an increased probability of error on the other words (cost). We ask whether excitation of the prefrontal cortex helps or hurts this cost. One hypothesis (the resource hypothesis) predicts a decrease in the cost due to the deployment of more attentional resources, while another (the focus hypothesis) predicts even greater costs due to further fine-tuning of selective attention. Our results are more consistent with the focus hypothesis: prefrontal stimulation caused a reliable increase in the benefit and a marginal increase in the cost of selective attention. To ensure that the effects are due to changes to the prefrontal cortex, we provide two checks: We show that the pattern of results is quite different if, instead, the primary motor cortex is stimulated. We also show that the stimulation-related benefits in the verbal task correlate with the stimulation-related benefits in an N-back task, which is known to tap into a prefrontal function. Our results shed light on how selective attention affects language production, and more generally, on how selective attention affects production of a sequence over time.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2770-2780
Number of pages11
JournalNeuropsychologia
Volume51
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Costs and Cost Analysis
Prefrontal Cortex
Motor Cortex
Language
Selective Attention
Costs
Stimulation
Resources

Keywords

  • Cognitive control
  • Executive functions
  • Language production
  • Selective attention
  • Transcranial direct cortical stimulation (tDCS)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

More attention when speaking : Does it help or does it hurt? / Nozari, Nazbanou; Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.

In: Neuropsychologia, Vol. 51, No. 13, 11.2013, p. 2770-2780.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nozari, Nazbanou ; Thompson-Schill, Sharon L. / More attention when speaking : Does it help or does it hurt?. In: Neuropsychologia. 2013 ; Vol. 51, No. 13. pp. 2770-2780.
@article{d52cf0dce724437292dee950bee9cc33,
title = "More attention when speaking: Does it help or does it hurt?",
abstract = "Paying selective attention to a word in a multi-word utterance results in a decreased probability of error on that word (benefit), but an increased probability of error on the other words (cost). We ask whether excitation of the prefrontal cortex helps or hurts this cost. One hypothesis (the resource hypothesis) predicts a decrease in the cost due to the deployment of more attentional resources, while another (the focus hypothesis) predicts even greater costs due to further fine-tuning of selective attention. Our results are more consistent with the focus hypothesis: prefrontal stimulation caused a reliable increase in the benefit and a marginal increase in the cost of selective attention. To ensure that the effects are due to changes to the prefrontal cortex, we provide two checks: We show that the pattern of results is quite different if, instead, the primary motor cortex is stimulated. We also show that the stimulation-related benefits in the verbal task correlate with the stimulation-related benefits in an N-back task, which is known to tap into a prefrontal function. Our results shed light on how selective attention affects language production, and more generally, on how selective attention affects production of a sequence over time.",
keywords = "Cognitive control, Executive functions, Language production, Selective attention, Transcranial direct cortical stimulation (tDCS)",
author = "Nazbanou Nozari and Thompson-Schill, {Sharon L.}",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.019",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "2770--2780",
journal = "Neuropsychologia",
issn = "0028-3932",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "13",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - More attention when speaking

T2 - Does it help or does it hurt?

AU - Nozari, Nazbanou

AU - Thompson-Schill, Sharon L.

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Paying selective attention to a word in a multi-word utterance results in a decreased probability of error on that word (benefit), but an increased probability of error on the other words (cost). We ask whether excitation of the prefrontal cortex helps or hurts this cost. One hypothesis (the resource hypothesis) predicts a decrease in the cost due to the deployment of more attentional resources, while another (the focus hypothesis) predicts even greater costs due to further fine-tuning of selective attention. Our results are more consistent with the focus hypothesis: prefrontal stimulation caused a reliable increase in the benefit and a marginal increase in the cost of selective attention. To ensure that the effects are due to changes to the prefrontal cortex, we provide two checks: We show that the pattern of results is quite different if, instead, the primary motor cortex is stimulated. We also show that the stimulation-related benefits in the verbal task correlate with the stimulation-related benefits in an N-back task, which is known to tap into a prefrontal function. Our results shed light on how selective attention affects language production, and more generally, on how selective attention affects production of a sequence over time.

AB - Paying selective attention to a word in a multi-word utterance results in a decreased probability of error on that word (benefit), but an increased probability of error on the other words (cost). We ask whether excitation of the prefrontal cortex helps or hurts this cost. One hypothesis (the resource hypothesis) predicts a decrease in the cost due to the deployment of more attentional resources, while another (the focus hypothesis) predicts even greater costs due to further fine-tuning of selective attention. Our results are more consistent with the focus hypothesis: prefrontal stimulation caused a reliable increase in the benefit and a marginal increase in the cost of selective attention. To ensure that the effects are due to changes to the prefrontal cortex, we provide two checks: We show that the pattern of results is quite different if, instead, the primary motor cortex is stimulated. We also show that the stimulation-related benefits in the verbal task correlate with the stimulation-related benefits in an N-back task, which is known to tap into a prefrontal function. Our results shed light on how selective attention affects language production, and more generally, on how selective attention affects production of a sequence over time.

KW - Cognitive control

KW - Executive functions

KW - Language production

KW - Selective attention

KW - Transcranial direct cortical stimulation (tDCS)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886299225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886299225&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.019

DO - 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.019

M3 - Article

C2 - 24012690

AN - SCOPUS:84886299225

VL - 51

SP - 2770

EP - 2780

JO - Neuropsychologia

JF - Neuropsychologia

SN - 0028-3932

IS - 13

ER -