TY - JOUR
T1 - Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series – Paper 8
T2 - patient-reported outcomes in electronic health records can inform clinical and policy decisions
AU - Ahmed, Sara
AU - Ware, Patrick
AU - Gardner, William
AU - Witter, James
AU - Bingham, Clifton O.
AU - Kairy, Dahlia
AU - Bartlett, Susan J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - Background Given that the goal of health care systems is to improve and maintain the health of the populations they serve, the indicators of performance must include outcomes that are meaningful to patients. The growth of health technologies provides an unprecedented opportunity to integrate the patient voice into clinical care by linking electronic health records (EHRs) to patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection. However, PRO data must be relevant, meaningful, and actionable for those who will have to invest the time and effort to collect it. Objective In this study, we highlight opportunities to integrate PRO data collection into EHRs. We consider how stakeholder perspectives should influence the selection of PROs and ways to enhance engagement in and commitment to PRO implementation. We propose a research and policy agenda to address unanswered questions and facilitate the widespread adoption of PRO data collection into EHRs. Discussion Building a learning health care system that gathers PRO data in ways that can inform individual patient care, quality improvement, and comparative effectiveness research has the potential to accelerate the application of new evidence and knowledge to patient care.
AB - Background Given that the goal of health care systems is to improve and maintain the health of the populations they serve, the indicators of performance must include outcomes that are meaningful to patients. The growth of health technologies provides an unprecedented opportunity to integrate the patient voice into clinical care by linking electronic health records (EHRs) to patient-reported outcome (PRO) data collection. However, PRO data must be relevant, meaningful, and actionable for those who will have to invest the time and effort to collect it. Objective In this study, we highlight opportunities to integrate PRO data collection into EHRs. We consider how stakeholder perspectives should influence the selection of PROs and ways to enhance engagement in and commitment to PRO implementation. We propose a research and policy agenda to address unanswered questions and facilitate the widespread adoption of PRO data collection into EHRs. Discussion Building a learning health care system that gathers PRO data in ways that can inform individual patient care, quality improvement, and comparative effectiveness research has the potential to accelerate the application of new evidence and knowledge to patient care.
KW - Electronic health records
KW - Patient engagement
KW - Patient-reported outcome measure
KW - Personal health record
KW - Quality improvement
KW - Technology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021409132&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021409132&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.011
DO - 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 28433675
AN - SCOPUS:85021409132
SN - 0895-4356
VL - 89
SP - 160
EP - 167
JO - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
JF - Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
ER -