Molecular Determinants of the Balance between Co-repressor and Co-activator Recruitment to the Retinoic Acid Receptor

Szilvia Benko, James D. Love, Marta Beládi, John W.R. Schwabe, Laszlo Nagy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The repressive and activating states of nuclear hormone receptors are achieved through the recruitment of cofactor proteins. The binding of co-repressors and coactivators is believed to be mutually exclusive and principally regulated by ligand binding. To understand the molecular determinants of the switch induced by ligand in the retinoic acid receptor and in particular the intrinsic role of the ligand binding domain (LBD) in cofactor binding and release, we carried out extensive mutational analysis of surface residues of the LBD. As seen previously we found that co-repressor and co-activator molecules bind to overlapping docking sites on the surface of the retinoic acid receptor α LBD. Perturbation of this surface impaired both co-activator and co-repressor association resulting in a transcriptionally inert receptor. Unexpectedly mutation of two residues, Trp-225 and Ala-392, which lie outside the docking site, had opposite effects on co-activator and co-repressor binding. W225A was a constitutive repressor that failed to bind co-activator and exhibited an increased, and ligand-insensitive, interaction with co-repressor. A392R, on the other hand, had reduced affinity for co-repressors and increased affinity for co-activators and behaved as a constitutive, but still ligand-inducible, activator. Analysis of known structures showed that these mutations lie in the proximity of helix 12 (H12), and their effects are likely to be the result of perturbations in the behavior of H12. These data suggest that residues in the close vicinity of H12 regulate cofactor affinity and determine the basal activity of receptors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)43797-43806
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Biological Chemistry
Volume278
Issue number44
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 31 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Co-Repressor Proteins
Retinoic Acid Receptors
Ligands
Mutation
Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Receptors
Switches
Molecules

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cell Biology

Cite this

Molecular Determinants of the Balance between Co-repressor and Co-activator Recruitment to the Retinoic Acid Receptor. / Benko, Szilvia; Love, James D.; Beládi, Marta; Schwabe, John W.R.; Nagy, Laszlo.

In: Journal of Biological Chemistry, Vol. 278, No. 44, 31.10.2003, p. 43797-43806.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Benko, Szilvia ; Love, James D. ; Beládi, Marta ; Schwabe, John W.R. ; Nagy, Laszlo. / Molecular Determinants of the Balance between Co-repressor and Co-activator Recruitment to the Retinoic Acid Receptor. In: Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2003 ; Vol. 278, No. 44. pp. 43797-43806.
@article{b2a812464e674a179ecb5bcd13a817de,
title = "Molecular Determinants of the Balance between Co-repressor and Co-activator Recruitment to the Retinoic Acid Receptor",
abstract = "The repressive and activating states of nuclear hormone receptors are achieved through the recruitment of cofactor proteins. The binding of co-repressors and coactivators is believed to be mutually exclusive and principally regulated by ligand binding. To understand the molecular determinants of the switch induced by ligand in the retinoic acid receptor and in particular the intrinsic role of the ligand binding domain (LBD) in cofactor binding and release, we carried out extensive mutational analysis of surface residues of the LBD. As seen previously we found that co-repressor and co-activator molecules bind to overlapping docking sites on the surface of the retinoic acid receptor α LBD. Perturbation of this surface impaired both co-activator and co-repressor association resulting in a transcriptionally inert receptor. Unexpectedly mutation of two residues, Trp-225 and Ala-392, which lie outside the docking site, had opposite effects on co-activator and co-repressor binding. W225A was a constitutive repressor that failed to bind co-activator and exhibited an increased, and ligand-insensitive, interaction with co-repressor. A392R, on the other hand, had reduced affinity for co-repressors and increased affinity for co-activators and behaved as a constitutive, but still ligand-inducible, activator. Analysis of known structures showed that these mutations lie in the proximity of helix 12 (H12), and their effects are likely to be the result of perturbations in the behavior of H12. These data suggest that residues in the close vicinity of H12 regulate cofactor affinity and determine the basal activity of receptors.",
author = "Szilvia Benko and Love, {James D.} and Marta Bel{\'a}di and Schwabe, {John W.R.} and Laszlo Nagy",
year = "2003",
month = "10",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1074/jbc.M306199200",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "278",
pages = "43797--43806",
journal = "Journal of Biological Chemistry",
issn = "0021-9258",
publisher = "American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Inc.",
number = "44",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Molecular Determinants of the Balance between Co-repressor and Co-activator Recruitment to the Retinoic Acid Receptor

AU - Benko, Szilvia

AU - Love, James D.

AU - Beládi, Marta

AU - Schwabe, John W.R.

AU - Nagy, Laszlo

PY - 2003/10/31

Y1 - 2003/10/31

N2 - The repressive and activating states of nuclear hormone receptors are achieved through the recruitment of cofactor proteins. The binding of co-repressors and coactivators is believed to be mutually exclusive and principally regulated by ligand binding. To understand the molecular determinants of the switch induced by ligand in the retinoic acid receptor and in particular the intrinsic role of the ligand binding domain (LBD) in cofactor binding and release, we carried out extensive mutational analysis of surface residues of the LBD. As seen previously we found that co-repressor and co-activator molecules bind to overlapping docking sites on the surface of the retinoic acid receptor α LBD. Perturbation of this surface impaired both co-activator and co-repressor association resulting in a transcriptionally inert receptor. Unexpectedly mutation of two residues, Trp-225 and Ala-392, which lie outside the docking site, had opposite effects on co-activator and co-repressor binding. W225A was a constitutive repressor that failed to bind co-activator and exhibited an increased, and ligand-insensitive, interaction with co-repressor. A392R, on the other hand, had reduced affinity for co-repressors and increased affinity for co-activators and behaved as a constitutive, but still ligand-inducible, activator. Analysis of known structures showed that these mutations lie in the proximity of helix 12 (H12), and their effects are likely to be the result of perturbations in the behavior of H12. These data suggest that residues in the close vicinity of H12 regulate cofactor affinity and determine the basal activity of receptors.

AB - The repressive and activating states of nuclear hormone receptors are achieved through the recruitment of cofactor proteins. The binding of co-repressors and coactivators is believed to be mutually exclusive and principally regulated by ligand binding. To understand the molecular determinants of the switch induced by ligand in the retinoic acid receptor and in particular the intrinsic role of the ligand binding domain (LBD) in cofactor binding and release, we carried out extensive mutational analysis of surface residues of the LBD. As seen previously we found that co-repressor and co-activator molecules bind to overlapping docking sites on the surface of the retinoic acid receptor α LBD. Perturbation of this surface impaired both co-activator and co-repressor association resulting in a transcriptionally inert receptor. Unexpectedly mutation of two residues, Trp-225 and Ala-392, which lie outside the docking site, had opposite effects on co-activator and co-repressor binding. W225A was a constitutive repressor that failed to bind co-activator and exhibited an increased, and ligand-insensitive, interaction with co-repressor. A392R, on the other hand, had reduced affinity for co-repressors and increased affinity for co-activators and behaved as a constitutive, but still ligand-inducible, activator. Analysis of known structures showed that these mutations lie in the proximity of helix 12 (H12), and their effects are likely to be the result of perturbations in the behavior of H12. These data suggest that residues in the close vicinity of H12 regulate cofactor affinity and determine the basal activity of receptors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242290172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242290172&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1074/jbc.M306199200

DO - 10.1074/jbc.M306199200

M3 - Article

C2 - 12917445

AN - SCOPUS:0242290172

VL - 278

SP - 43797

EP - 43806

JO - Journal of Biological Chemistry

JF - Journal of Biological Chemistry

SN - 0021-9258

IS - 44

ER -