Modern management of penetrating tracheal injuries

John D. Lyons, David V. Feliciano, Amy D. Wyrzykowski, Grace Rozycki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Complications after tracheal repair in the past have included wound infections, tracheal stenosis, "spitting" of sutures, and tracheoesophageal fistulas. Modern operative approaches have significantly decreased the incidence of these complications.We conducted retrospective data collection using the TRACS database. Changes that preceded the time interval of the study included the following: 1) an emphasis on clinical (rather than endoscopic) recognition of injury; 2) minimal peritracheal dissection and repair with absorbable sutures; 3) limited use of "protective" tracheostomies; and 4) use of muscle buttresses to cover tracheal repairs, especially in patients with combined injuries. From 1997 to 2010, 22 patients were treated for wounds to the trachea (cervical 20, thoracic 2). The mechanism of injury was a gunshot wound in 15 patients and a stab wound in seven. A clinical diagnosis of the need for cervical operation or of a tracheal injury was made in 19 patients (86%), whereas three patients had positive diagnostic studies. Direct tracheal repair (No. 19) or evaluation of a superficial injury (No. 1) was performed in 20 patients, and three (15%) had a tracheostomy performed. Combined injuries were present in 12 patients (55%), most commonly to the esophagus (10 of 12 [83%]), and 10 of these 12 patients had vascularized buttresses applied to the tracheal repair. There were seven significant complications in patients with combined injuries to the esophagus or carotid artery. One patient (4.5%) died. Patients with penetrating tracheal injuries most commonly present with overt findings. Modern techniques of repair have eliminated many of the complications noted in the past. Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)188-193
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Surgeon
Volume79
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Tracheostomy
Sutures
Esophagus
Tracheoesophageal Fistula
Stab Wounds
Tracheal Stenosis
Gunshot Wounds
Wound Infection
Trachea
Carotid Arteries
Dissection
Thorax
Databases
Muscles
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Lyons, J. D., Feliciano, D. V., Wyrzykowski, A. D., & Rozycki, G. (2013). Modern management of penetrating tracheal injuries. American Surgeon, 79(2), 188-193.

Modern management of penetrating tracheal injuries. / Lyons, John D.; Feliciano, David V.; Wyrzykowski, Amy D.; Rozycki, Grace.

In: American Surgeon, Vol. 79, No. 2, 01.02.2013, p. 188-193.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lyons, JD, Feliciano, DV, Wyrzykowski, AD & Rozycki, G 2013, 'Modern management of penetrating tracheal injuries', American Surgeon, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 188-193.
Lyons JD, Feliciano DV, Wyrzykowski AD, Rozycki G. Modern management of penetrating tracheal injuries. American Surgeon. 2013 Feb 1;79(2):188-193.
Lyons, John D. ; Feliciano, David V. ; Wyrzykowski, Amy D. ; Rozycki, Grace. / Modern management of penetrating tracheal injuries. In: American Surgeon. 2013 ; Vol. 79, No. 2. pp. 188-193.
@article{7c5f72d23f9c4c7fb549692f911e8546,
title = "Modern management of penetrating tracheal injuries",
abstract = "Complications after tracheal repair in the past have included wound infections, tracheal stenosis, {"}spitting{"} of sutures, and tracheoesophageal fistulas. Modern operative approaches have significantly decreased the incidence of these complications.We conducted retrospective data collection using the TRACS database. Changes that preceded the time interval of the study included the following: 1) an emphasis on clinical (rather than endoscopic) recognition of injury; 2) minimal peritracheal dissection and repair with absorbable sutures; 3) limited use of {"}protective{"} tracheostomies; and 4) use of muscle buttresses to cover tracheal repairs, especially in patients with combined injuries. From 1997 to 2010, 22 patients were treated for wounds to the trachea (cervical 20, thoracic 2). The mechanism of injury was a gunshot wound in 15 patients and a stab wound in seven. A clinical diagnosis of the need for cervical operation or of a tracheal injury was made in 19 patients (86{\%}), whereas three patients had positive diagnostic studies. Direct tracheal repair (No. 19) or evaluation of a superficial injury (No. 1) was performed in 20 patients, and three (15{\%}) had a tracheostomy performed. Combined injuries were present in 12 patients (55{\%}), most commonly to the esophagus (10 of 12 [83{\%}]), and 10 of these 12 patients had vascularized buttresses applied to the tracheal repair. There were seven significant complications in patients with combined injuries to the esophagus or carotid artery. One patient (4.5{\%}) died. Patients with penetrating tracheal injuries most commonly present with overt findings. Modern techniques of repair have eliminated many of the complications noted in the past. Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress. All rights reserved.",
author = "Lyons, {John D.} and Feliciano, {David V.} and Wyrzykowski, {Amy D.} and Grace Rozycki",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "79",
pages = "188--193",
journal = "American Surgeon",
issn = "0003-1348",
publisher = "Southeastern Surgical Congress",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modern management of penetrating tracheal injuries

AU - Lyons, John D.

AU - Feliciano, David V.

AU - Wyrzykowski, Amy D.

AU - Rozycki, Grace

PY - 2013/2/1

Y1 - 2013/2/1

N2 - Complications after tracheal repair in the past have included wound infections, tracheal stenosis, "spitting" of sutures, and tracheoesophageal fistulas. Modern operative approaches have significantly decreased the incidence of these complications.We conducted retrospective data collection using the TRACS database. Changes that preceded the time interval of the study included the following: 1) an emphasis on clinical (rather than endoscopic) recognition of injury; 2) minimal peritracheal dissection and repair with absorbable sutures; 3) limited use of "protective" tracheostomies; and 4) use of muscle buttresses to cover tracheal repairs, especially in patients with combined injuries. From 1997 to 2010, 22 patients were treated for wounds to the trachea (cervical 20, thoracic 2). The mechanism of injury was a gunshot wound in 15 patients and a stab wound in seven. A clinical diagnosis of the need for cervical operation or of a tracheal injury was made in 19 patients (86%), whereas three patients had positive diagnostic studies. Direct tracheal repair (No. 19) or evaluation of a superficial injury (No. 1) was performed in 20 patients, and three (15%) had a tracheostomy performed. Combined injuries were present in 12 patients (55%), most commonly to the esophagus (10 of 12 [83%]), and 10 of these 12 patients had vascularized buttresses applied to the tracheal repair. There were seven significant complications in patients with combined injuries to the esophagus or carotid artery. One patient (4.5%) died. Patients with penetrating tracheal injuries most commonly present with overt findings. Modern techniques of repair have eliminated many of the complications noted in the past. Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress. All rights reserved.

AB - Complications after tracheal repair in the past have included wound infections, tracheal stenosis, "spitting" of sutures, and tracheoesophageal fistulas. Modern operative approaches have significantly decreased the incidence of these complications.We conducted retrospective data collection using the TRACS database. Changes that preceded the time interval of the study included the following: 1) an emphasis on clinical (rather than endoscopic) recognition of injury; 2) minimal peritracheal dissection and repair with absorbable sutures; 3) limited use of "protective" tracheostomies; and 4) use of muscle buttresses to cover tracheal repairs, especially in patients with combined injuries. From 1997 to 2010, 22 patients were treated for wounds to the trachea (cervical 20, thoracic 2). The mechanism of injury was a gunshot wound in 15 patients and a stab wound in seven. A clinical diagnosis of the need for cervical operation or of a tracheal injury was made in 19 patients (86%), whereas three patients had positive diagnostic studies. Direct tracheal repair (No. 19) or evaluation of a superficial injury (No. 1) was performed in 20 patients, and three (15%) had a tracheostomy performed. Combined injuries were present in 12 patients (55%), most commonly to the esophagus (10 of 12 [83%]), and 10 of these 12 patients had vascularized buttresses applied to the tracheal repair. There were seven significant complications in patients with combined injuries to the esophagus or carotid artery. One patient (4.5%) died. Patients with penetrating tracheal injuries most commonly present with overt findings. Modern techniques of repair have eliminated many of the complications noted in the past. Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress. All rights reserved.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875034672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84875034672&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 23336659

AN - SCOPUS:84875034672

VL - 79

SP - 188

EP - 193

JO - American Surgeon

JF - American Surgeon

SN - 0003-1348

IS - 2

ER -