Modern humans are not (quite) isometric

Adam Sylvester, Patricia A. Kramer, William L. Jungers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Allometric relationships are important sources of information for many types of anthropological and biological research. The baseline for all allometric relationships is isometry (or geometric similarity), the principal that shape is invariant of size. Here, we formally test for geometric similarity in modern humans, looking at the maximum lengths of four long bones (humerus, radius, femur, and tibia). We use Jolicoeur's multivariate allometry method to examine globally distributed samples of human populations, both collectively and individually. Results indicate that humans are not geometrically similar, although morphological deviations from isometry are small.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371-383
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology
Volume137
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2008

Fingerprint

source of information
Anthropology
Humerus
Tibia
Femur
Bone and Bones
Research
Population

Keywords

  • Allometry
  • Geometric similarity
  • Long bones

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Anatomy

Cite this

Modern humans are not (quite) isometric. / Sylvester, Adam; Kramer, Patricia A.; Jungers, William L.

In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Vol. 137, No. 4, 12.2008, p. 371-383.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sylvester, Adam ; Kramer, Patricia A. ; Jungers, William L. / Modern humans are not (quite) isometric. In: American Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2008 ; Vol. 137, No. 4. pp. 371-383.
@article{a26ac25115314539b80d8b8a43954f33,
title = "Modern humans are not (quite) isometric",
abstract = "Allometric relationships are important sources of information for many types of anthropological and biological research. The baseline for all allometric relationships is isometry (or geometric similarity), the principal that shape is invariant of size. Here, we formally test for geometric similarity in modern humans, looking at the maximum lengths of four long bones (humerus, radius, femur, and tibia). We use Jolicoeur's multivariate allometry method to examine globally distributed samples of human populations, both collectively and individually. Results indicate that humans are not geometrically similar, although morphological deviations from isometry are small.",
keywords = "Allometry, Geometric similarity, Long bones",
author = "Adam Sylvester and Kramer, {Patricia A.} and Jungers, {William L.}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1002/ajpa.20880",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "137",
pages = "371--383",
journal = "American Journal of Physical Anthropology",
issn = "0002-9483",
publisher = "Wiley-Liss Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Modern humans are not (quite) isometric

AU - Sylvester, Adam

AU - Kramer, Patricia A.

AU - Jungers, William L.

PY - 2008/12

Y1 - 2008/12

N2 - Allometric relationships are important sources of information for many types of anthropological and biological research. The baseline for all allometric relationships is isometry (or geometric similarity), the principal that shape is invariant of size. Here, we formally test for geometric similarity in modern humans, looking at the maximum lengths of four long bones (humerus, radius, femur, and tibia). We use Jolicoeur's multivariate allometry method to examine globally distributed samples of human populations, both collectively and individually. Results indicate that humans are not geometrically similar, although morphological deviations from isometry are small.

AB - Allometric relationships are important sources of information for many types of anthropological and biological research. The baseline for all allometric relationships is isometry (or geometric similarity), the principal that shape is invariant of size. Here, we formally test for geometric similarity in modern humans, looking at the maximum lengths of four long bones (humerus, radius, femur, and tibia). We use Jolicoeur's multivariate allometry method to examine globally distributed samples of human populations, both collectively and individually. Results indicate that humans are not geometrically similar, although morphological deviations from isometry are small.

KW - Allometry

KW - Geometric similarity

KW - Long bones

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57149108323&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57149108323&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/ajpa.20880

DO - 10.1002/ajpa.20880

M3 - Article

C2 - 18613073

AN - SCOPUS:57149108323

VL - 137

SP - 371

EP - 383

JO - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

JF - American Journal of Physical Anthropology

SN - 0002-9483

IS - 4

ER -