TY - JOUR
T1 - Model-free parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI
T2 - Sensitivity to EES volume fraction and bolus timing
AU - Jesberger, John A.
AU - Rafie, Niusha
AU - Duerk, Jeffrey L.
AU - Sunshine, Jeffrey L.
AU - Mendez, Matthew
AU - Remick, Scot C.
AU - Lewin, Jonathan S.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2011 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006/9
Y1 - 2006/9
N2 - Purpose: To quantify the unknown relative sensitivities of semiquantitative measures from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI to variations in the volume fraction Ve of the extravascular extracellular space (EES), and the duration of the contrast injection. Materials and Methods: Tissue-uptake curves were simulated across various values of F, PS, Ve, and bolus timings, with and without additive noise and at different image re-acquisition rates. From each, the peak of the first derivative (Gpeak), the total uptake after the rapid first phase (CE), and the IAUC were calculated and plotted against F for each experimental condition. Relationships between each measure and the corresponding quantitative measure Ktrans were also examined, particularly for linearity. Results: The highest sensitivity to flow was achieved for shorter bolus timings for Gpeak, CE, and IAUC. G peak and IAUC were most linearly related to Ktrans. The sensitivity to Ve was lowest for Gpeak, followed by IAUC and CE. Long sampling intervals resulted in severe underestimation of G peak, while IAUC was unaffected provided that the limits of integration were properly applied. Gpeak could not be properly calculated in the presence of noise without a prior smoothing of the acquired curves, while IAUC was again unaffected by noise. Conclusion: Gpeak and IAUC are both useful model-free analogs of blood flow (i.e., K trans) for pre- and posttreatment comparisons. Gpeak may be the better choice in cases where larger changes in Ve are likely, but only if sufficient noise reduction and fast image sampling are applied. If Ve is expected to remain stable, IAUC is superior to Gpeak by virtue of its stability in the face of noise and more reliable estimation over a wider range of sampling rates.
AB - Purpose: To quantify the unknown relative sensitivities of semiquantitative measures from dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI to variations in the volume fraction Ve of the extravascular extracellular space (EES), and the duration of the contrast injection. Materials and Methods: Tissue-uptake curves were simulated across various values of F, PS, Ve, and bolus timings, with and without additive noise and at different image re-acquisition rates. From each, the peak of the first derivative (Gpeak), the total uptake after the rapid first phase (CE), and the IAUC were calculated and plotted against F for each experimental condition. Relationships between each measure and the corresponding quantitative measure Ktrans were also examined, particularly for linearity. Results: The highest sensitivity to flow was achieved for shorter bolus timings for Gpeak, CE, and IAUC. G peak and IAUC were most linearly related to Ktrans. The sensitivity to Ve was lowest for Gpeak, followed by IAUC and CE. Long sampling intervals resulted in severe underestimation of G peak, while IAUC was unaffected provided that the limits of integration were properly applied. Gpeak could not be properly calculated in the presence of noise without a prior smoothing of the acquired curves, while IAUC was again unaffected by noise. Conclusion: Gpeak and IAUC are both useful model-free analogs of blood flow (i.e., K trans) for pre- and posttreatment comparisons. Gpeak may be the better choice in cases where larger changes in Ve are likely, but only if sufficient noise reduction and fast image sampling are applied. If Ve is expected to remain stable, IAUC is superior to Gpeak by virtue of its stability in the face of noise and more reliable estimation over a wider range of sampling rates.
KW - Angiogenesis
KW - Diffusible tracers
KW - Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
KW - Methodology
KW - Perfusion imaging
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748255512&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748255512&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jmri.20670
DO - 10.1002/jmri.20670
M3 - Article
C2 - 16892197
AN - SCOPUS:33748255512
SN - 1053-1807
VL - 24
SP - 586
EP - 594
JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
IS - 3
ER -