TY - JOUR
T1 - Model-Based Meta-Analysis of Relapsing Mouse Model Studies from the Critical Path to Tuberculosis Drug Regimens Initiative Database
AU - Berg, Alexander
AU - Clary, James
AU - Hanna, Debra
AU - Nuermberger, Eric
AU - Lenaerts, Anne
AU - Ammerman, Nicole
AU - Ramey, Michelle
AU - Hartley, Dan
AU - Hermann, David
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge the contributions of the Preclinical Sciences Working Group of the Critical Path to TB Drug Regimens Initiative for the critical discussions that helped to define the scope of this project as well as for their review of the analysis plan and feedback on preliminary results. This work was supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, which provided funding to the Critical Path to TB Drug Regimens Initiative and Cognigen Corporation. We declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022/3
Y1 - 2022/3
N2 - Tuberculosis (TB), the disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), remains a leading infectious disease-related cause of death worldwide, necessitating the development of new and improved treatment regimens. Nonclinical evaluation of candidate drug combinations via the relapsing mouse model (RMM) is an important step in regimen development, through which candidate regimens that provide the greatest decrease in the probability of relapse following treatment in mice may be identified for further development. Although RMM studies are a critical tool to evaluate regimen efficacy, making comprehensive "apples to apples" comparisons of regimen performance in the RMM has been a challenge in large part due to the need to evaluate and adjust for variability across studies arising from differences in design and execution. To address this knowledge gap, we performed a model-based meta-analysis on data for 17 unique regimens obtained from a total of 1592 mice across 28 RMM studies. Specifically, a mixed-effects logistic regression model was developed that described the treatment duration- dependent probability of relapse for each regimen and identified relevant covariates contributing to interstudy variability. Using the model, covariate-normalized metrics of interest, namely, treatment duration required to reach 50% and 10% relapse probability, were derived and used to compare relative regimen performance. Overall, the model-based meta-analysis approach presented herein enabled cross-study comparison of efficacy in the RMM and provided a framework whereby data from emerging studies may be analyzed in the context of historical data to aid in selecting candidate drug combinations for clinical evaluation as TB drug regimens.
AB - Tuberculosis (TB), the disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), remains a leading infectious disease-related cause of death worldwide, necessitating the development of new and improved treatment regimens. Nonclinical evaluation of candidate drug combinations via the relapsing mouse model (RMM) is an important step in regimen development, through which candidate regimens that provide the greatest decrease in the probability of relapse following treatment in mice may be identified for further development. Although RMM studies are a critical tool to evaluate regimen efficacy, making comprehensive "apples to apples" comparisons of regimen performance in the RMM has been a challenge in large part due to the need to evaluate and adjust for variability across studies arising from differences in design and execution. To address this knowledge gap, we performed a model-based meta-analysis on data for 17 unique regimens obtained from a total of 1592 mice across 28 RMM studies. Specifically, a mixed-effects logistic regression model was developed that described the treatment duration- dependent probability of relapse for each regimen and identified relevant covariates contributing to interstudy variability. Using the model, covariate-normalized metrics of interest, namely, treatment duration required to reach 50% and 10% relapse probability, were derived and used to compare relative regimen performance. Overall, the model-based meta-analysis approach presented herein enabled cross-study comparison of efficacy in the RMM and provided a framework whereby data from emerging studies may be analyzed in the context of historical data to aid in selecting candidate drug combinations for clinical evaluation as TB drug regimens.
KW - Mycobacterium
KW - model-based metaanalysis
KW - modeling and simulation
KW - relapsing mouse model
KW - tuberculosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126616185&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85126616185&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1128/aac.01793-21
DO - 10.1128/aac.01793-21
M3 - Article
C2 - 35099274
AN - SCOPUS:85126616185
SN - 0066-4804
VL - 66
JO - Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
JF - Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
IS - 3
M1 - e01793-21
ER -