Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in preterm, small-for-gestational- age newborns

Erika F. Werner, David A. Savitz, Teresa M. Janevic, Robert M. Ehsanipoor, Stephen F. Thung, Edmund F. Funai, Heather S. Lipkind

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Objective: To compare neonatal outcomes by method of delivery in preterm (34 weeks of gestation or prior), small-for-gestational-age (SGA) newborns in a large diverse cohort. Methods: Birth data for 1995-2003 from New York City were linked to hospital discharge data. Data were limited to singleton, liveborn, vertex neonates delivered between 25 and 34 weeks of gestation. Births complicated by known congenital anomalies and birth weight less than 500 g were excluded. Small for gestational age was used as a surrogate for intrauterine growth restriction. Associations between method of delivery and neonatal morbidities were estimated using logistic regression. Results: Two thousand eight hundred eighty-five SGA neonates meeting study criteria were identified; 42.1% were delivered vaginally, and 57.9% were delivered by cesarean. There was no significant difference in intraventricular hemorrhage, subdural hemorrhage, seizure, or sepsis between the cesarean delivery and vaginal delivery groups. Cesarean delivery compared with vaginal delivery was associated with increased odds of respiratory distress syndrome. The increased odds persisted after controlling for maternal age, parity, ethnicity, education, primary payer, prepregnancy weight, gestational age at delivery, diabetes, and hypertension. Conclusion: Cesarean delivery was not associated with improved neonatal outcomes in preterm SGA newborns and was associated with an increased risk of respiratory distress syndrome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)560-564
Number of pages5
JournalObstetrics and gynecology
Issue number3
StatePublished - Sep 2012
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology


Dive into the research topics of 'Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in preterm, small-for-gestational- age newborns'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this