MO‐D‐304A‐01: Spatial and Fourier Analysis of Non‐Stationarity in 3D X‐Ray Computed Tomography

A. Pineda, D. Tward, A. Gonzalez, Jeff Siewerdsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the stationarity of 3D x‐ray cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) through spatial and frequency domain descriptions of noise. Such analysis of the stationarity assumption is an essential component of task‐based assessment of CBCT imaging performance. Method and Materials: Three objects (air, water cylinder + bowtie filter, and water cylinder only) were imaged using a CBCT benchtop and the Feldkamp algorithm for 3D filtered backprojection. Noise‐only 3D images were analyzed from the difference of two CBCT volumes under the three conditions. In the spatial domain, noise stationarity was analyzed in terms of variance maps, and in the frequency domain, in terms of the covariance matrix of the Fourier coefficients — of which the diagonal is the noise‐power spectrum (NPS). For a stationary random process, the Fourier covariance matrix (FCM) is diagonal and the same at every location in the image. Results: The three experimental conditions affected the degree of stationarity: air (highest stationarity), water+bowtie, water cylinder (least stationary). This rank order was consistent in terms of variance maps and the NPS. The off‐diagonal elements of the FCM were non‐negligible in comparison to the NPS and believed to have measurable effect on detectability. Conclusion: The degree of non‐stationarity in CBCT can be controlled experimentally and analyzed through both spatial and frequency domain techniques. From a practical standpoint of system design and evaluation, the findings suggest strategies for meaningful CBCT noise and NPS analysis. Model observer analysis should assess the validity of the stationarity assumption, recognizing its potential effect on task performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2697
Number of pages1
JournalMedical Physics
Volume36
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Spatial Analysis
X Ray Computed Tomography
Fourier Analysis
Tomography
Noise
Water
Air
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Task Performance and Analysis
Spectrum Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biophysics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

MO‐D‐304A‐01 : Spatial and Fourier Analysis of Non‐Stationarity in 3D X‐Ray Computed Tomography. / Pineda, A.; Tward, D.; Gonzalez, A.; Siewerdsen, Jeff.

In: Medical Physics, Vol. 36, No. 6, 2009, p. 2697.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8291ac39823848568fb5cd58fe123079,
title = "MO‐D‐304A‐01: Spatial and Fourier Analysis of Non‐Stationarity in 3D X‐Ray Computed Tomography",
abstract = "Purpose: To analyze the stationarity of 3D x‐ray cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) through spatial and frequency domain descriptions of noise. Such analysis of the stationarity assumption is an essential component of task‐based assessment of CBCT imaging performance. Method and Materials: Three objects (air, water cylinder + bowtie filter, and water cylinder only) were imaged using a CBCT benchtop and the Feldkamp algorithm for 3D filtered backprojection. Noise‐only 3D images were analyzed from the difference of two CBCT volumes under the three conditions. In the spatial domain, noise stationarity was analyzed in terms of variance maps, and in the frequency domain, in terms of the covariance matrix of the Fourier coefficients — of which the diagonal is the noise‐power spectrum (NPS). For a stationary random process, the Fourier covariance matrix (FCM) is diagonal and the same at every location in the image. Results: The three experimental conditions affected the degree of stationarity: air (highest stationarity), water+bowtie, water cylinder (least stationary). This rank order was consistent in terms of variance maps and the NPS. The off‐diagonal elements of the FCM were non‐negligible in comparison to the NPS and believed to have measurable effect on detectability. Conclusion: The degree of non‐stationarity in CBCT can be controlled experimentally and analyzed through both spatial and frequency domain techniques. From a practical standpoint of system design and evaluation, the findings suggest strategies for meaningful CBCT noise and NPS analysis. Model observer analysis should assess the validity of the stationarity assumption, recognizing its potential effect on task performance.",
author = "A. Pineda and D. Tward and A. Gonzalez and Jeff Siewerdsen",
year = "2009",
doi = "10.1118/1.3182230",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "2697",
journal = "Medical Physics",
issn = "0094-2405",
publisher = "AAPM - American Association of Physicists in Medicine",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - MO‐D‐304A‐01

T2 - Spatial and Fourier Analysis of Non‐Stationarity in 3D X‐Ray Computed Tomography

AU - Pineda, A.

AU - Tward, D.

AU - Gonzalez, A.

AU - Siewerdsen, Jeff

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Purpose: To analyze the stationarity of 3D x‐ray cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) through spatial and frequency domain descriptions of noise. Such analysis of the stationarity assumption is an essential component of task‐based assessment of CBCT imaging performance. Method and Materials: Three objects (air, water cylinder + bowtie filter, and water cylinder only) were imaged using a CBCT benchtop and the Feldkamp algorithm for 3D filtered backprojection. Noise‐only 3D images were analyzed from the difference of two CBCT volumes under the three conditions. In the spatial domain, noise stationarity was analyzed in terms of variance maps, and in the frequency domain, in terms of the covariance matrix of the Fourier coefficients — of which the diagonal is the noise‐power spectrum (NPS). For a stationary random process, the Fourier covariance matrix (FCM) is diagonal and the same at every location in the image. Results: The three experimental conditions affected the degree of stationarity: air (highest stationarity), water+bowtie, water cylinder (least stationary). This rank order was consistent in terms of variance maps and the NPS. The off‐diagonal elements of the FCM were non‐negligible in comparison to the NPS and believed to have measurable effect on detectability. Conclusion: The degree of non‐stationarity in CBCT can be controlled experimentally and analyzed through both spatial and frequency domain techniques. From a practical standpoint of system design and evaluation, the findings suggest strategies for meaningful CBCT noise and NPS analysis. Model observer analysis should assess the validity of the stationarity assumption, recognizing its potential effect on task performance.

AB - Purpose: To analyze the stationarity of 3D x‐ray cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) through spatial and frequency domain descriptions of noise. Such analysis of the stationarity assumption is an essential component of task‐based assessment of CBCT imaging performance. Method and Materials: Three objects (air, water cylinder + bowtie filter, and water cylinder only) were imaged using a CBCT benchtop and the Feldkamp algorithm for 3D filtered backprojection. Noise‐only 3D images were analyzed from the difference of two CBCT volumes under the three conditions. In the spatial domain, noise stationarity was analyzed in terms of variance maps, and in the frequency domain, in terms of the covariance matrix of the Fourier coefficients — of which the diagonal is the noise‐power spectrum (NPS). For a stationary random process, the Fourier covariance matrix (FCM) is diagonal and the same at every location in the image. Results: The three experimental conditions affected the degree of stationarity: air (highest stationarity), water+bowtie, water cylinder (least stationary). This rank order was consistent in terms of variance maps and the NPS. The off‐diagonal elements of the FCM were non‐negligible in comparison to the NPS and believed to have measurable effect on detectability. Conclusion: The degree of non‐stationarity in CBCT can be controlled experimentally and analyzed through both spatial and frequency domain techniques. From a practical standpoint of system design and evaluation, the findings suggest strategies for meaningful CBCT noise and NPS analysis. Model observer analysis should assess the validity of the stationarity assumption, recognizing its potential effect on task performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953524066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953524066&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1118/1.3182230

DO - 10.1118/1.3182230

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77953524066

VL - 36

SP - 2697

JO - Medical Physics

JF - Medical Physics

SN - 0094-2405

IS - 6

ER -