Mixed methods process evaluation of pilot implementation of the African Federation for Emergency Medicine trauma data project protocol in Ethiopia

Adam D. Laytin, Aklilu Azazh, Biruk Girma, Finot Debebe, Lemlem Beza, Heyria Seid, Megan Landes, Julia Wytsma, Teri A. Reynolds

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Introduction: The African Federation for Emergency Medicine Trauma Data Project (AFEM-TDP) has created a protocol for trauma data collection in resource-limited settings using a clinical chart with embedded standardized data points that facilitates a systematic approach to injured patients. We performed a process evaluation of the protocol's implementation at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia to provide insights for adapting the protocol to our setting. Methods: During the pilot implementation period, the quality of collected data was assessed. Structured key informant interviews about participant experiences and perceptions of the protocol implementation were then conducted. Interviews were analysed using a SWOT model. Results: During pilot data collection, the overall capture rate was 21%. Variables collected with high frequency included demographics, vital signs and ED diagnosis, while mechanism of injury and ED disposition were often missed. Key informant interviews identified Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats to the protocol. Strengths included improved patient care, enhanced training for junior providers and facilitated data collection. Weaknesses included inadequate supervision and challenges relating to the physical size of the form, which resulted in missing data. Opportunities included retrospective research and quality improvement work. Threats included perceived lack of a local champion, poor buy-in from other hospital departments and need for ongoing financial support. Conclusion: A mixed methods process evaluation is an invaluable tool when implementing novel data collection protocols, especially in resource-limited settings. We determined early successes and challenges of the implementation of the AFEM-TDP protocol and generated strategies to adapt the protocol to better suit our setting. Lessons from this process evaluation may be informative for other researchers designing and implementing similar data collection protocols.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S28-S31
JournalAfrican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ethiopia
Emergency Medicine
medicine
Medicine
Wounds and Injuries
Interviews
Financial Support
Vital Signs
Hospital Departments
Quality Improvement
Patient Care
Research Personnel
Demography
evaluation
method
project
protocol
resource
Research

Keywords

  • Africa
  • Epidemiology
  • Ethiopia
  • Implementation research
  • Quality improvement
  • Trauma registry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Gerontology
  • Emergency
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Critical Care

Cite this

Mixed methods process evaluation of pilot implementation of the African Federation for Emergency Medicine trauma data project protocol in Ethiopia. / Laytin, Adam D.; Azazh, Aklilu; Girma, Biruk; Debebe, Finot; Beza, Lemlem; Seid, Heyria; Landes, Megan; Wytsma, Julia; Reynolds, Teri A.

In: African Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 9, 01.01.2019, p. S28-S31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Laytin, Adam D. ; Azazh, Aklilu ; Girma, Biruk ; Debebe, Finot ; Beza, Lemlem ; Seid, Heyria ; Landes, Megan ; Wytsma, Julia ; Reynolds, Teri A. / Mixed methods process evaluation of pilot implementation of the African Federation for Emergency Medicine trauma data project protocol in Ethiopia. In: African Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 9. pp. S28-S31.
@article{24347ee9317941e1a240ca3cc06bba2e,
title = "Mixed methods process evaluation of pilot implementation of the African Federation for Emergency Medicine trauma data project protocol in Ethiopia",
abstract = "Introduction: The African Federation for Emergency Medicine Trauma Data Project (AFEM-TDP) has created a protocol for trauma data collection in resource-limited settings using a clinical chart with embedded standardized data points that facilitates a systematic approach to injured patients. We performed a process evaluation of the protocol's implementation at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia to provide insights for adapting the protocol to our setting. Methods: During the pilot implementation period, the quality of collected data was assessed. Structured key informant interviews about participant experiences and perceptions of the protocol implementation were then conducted. Interviews were analysed using a SWOT model. Results: During pilot data collection, the overall capture rate was 21{\%}. Variables collected with high frequency included demographics, vital signs and ED diagnosis, while mechanism of injury and ED disposition were often missed. Key informant interviews identified Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats to the protocol. Strengths included improved patient care, enhanced training for junior providers and facilitated data collection. Weaknesses included inadequate supervision and challenges relating to the physical size of the form, which resulted in missing data. Opportunities included retrospective research and quality improvement work. Threats included perceived lack of a local champion, poor buy-in from other hospital departments and need for ongoing financial support. Conclusion: A mixed methods process evaluation is an invaluable tool when implementing novel data collection protocols, especially in resource-limited settings. We determined early successes and challenges of the implementation of the AFEM-TDP protocol and generated strategies to adapt the protocol to better suit our setting. Lessons from this process evaluation may be informative for other researchers designing and implementing similar data collection protocols.",
keywords = "Africa, Epidemiology, Ethiopia, Implementation research, Quality improvement, Trauma registry",
author = "Laytin, {Adam D.} and Aklilu Azazh and Biruk Girma and Finot Debebe and Lemlem Beza and Heyria Seid and Megan Landes and Julia Wytsma and Reynolds, {Teri A.}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.afjem.2019.01.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "S28--S31",
journal = "African Journal of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "2211-419X",
publisher = "African Federation for Emergency Medicine",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mixed methods process evaluation of pilot implementation of the African Federation for Emergency Medicine trauma data project protocol in Ethiopia

AU - Laytin, Adam D.

AU - Azazh, Aklilu

AU - Girma, Biruk

AU - Debebe, Finot

AU - Beza, Lemlem

AU - Seid, Heyria

AU - Landes, Megan

AU - Wytsma, Julia

AU - Reynolds, Teri A.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Introduction: The African Federation for Emergency Medicine Trauma Data Project (AFEM-TDP) has created a protocol for trauma data collection in resource-limited settings using a clinical chart with embedded standardized data points that facilitates a systematic approach to injured patients. We performed a process evaluation of the protocol's implementation at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia to provide insights for adapting the protocol to our setting. Methods: During the pilot implementation period, the quality of collected data was assessed. Structured key informant interviews about participant experiences and perceptions of the protocol implementation were then conducted. Interviews were analysed using a SWOT model. Results: During pilot data collection, the overall capture rate was 21%. Variables collected with high frequency included demographics, vital signs and ED diagnosis, while mechanism of injury and ED disposition were often missed. Key informant interviews identified Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats to the protocol. Strengths included improved patient care, enhanced training for junior providers and facilitated data collection. Weaknesses included inadequate supervision and challenges relating to the physical size of the form, which resulted in missing data. Opportunities included retrospective research and quality improvement work. Threats included perceived lack of a local champion, poor buy-in from other hospital departments and need for ongoing financial support. Conclusion: A mixed methods process evaluation is an invaluable tool when implementing novel data collection protocols, especially in resource-limited settings. We determined early successes and challenges of the implementation of the AFEM-TDP protocol and generated strategies to adapt the protocol to better suit our setting. Lessons from this process evaluation may be informative for other researchers designing and implementing similar data collection protocols.

AB - Introduction: The African Federation for Emergency Medicine Trauma Data Project (AFEM-TDP) has created a protocol for trauma data collection in resource-limited settings using a clinical chart with embedded standardized data points that facilitates a systematic approach to injured patients. We performed a process evaluation of the protocol's implementation at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia to provide insights for adapting the protocol to our setting. Methods: During the pilot implementation period, the quality of collected data was assessed. Structured key informant interviews about participant experiences and perceptions of the protocol implementation were then conducted. Interviews were analysed using a SWOT model. Results: During pilot data collection, the overall capture rate was 21%. Variables collected with high frequency included demographics, vital signs and ED diagnosis, while mechanism of injury and ED disposition were often missed. Key informant interviews identified Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats to the protocol. Strengths included improved patient care, enhanced training for junior providers and facilitated data collection. Weaknesses included inadequate supervision and challenges relating to the physical size of the form, which resulted in missing data. Opportunities included retrospective research and quality improvement work. Threats included perceived lack of a local champion, poor buy-in from other hospital departments and need for ongoing financial support. Conclusion: A mixed methods process evaluation is an invaluable tool when implementing novel data collection protocols, especially in resource-limited settings. We determined early successes and challenges of the implementation of the AFEM-TDP protocol and generated strategies to adapt the protocol to better suit our setting. Lessons from this process evaluation may be informative for other researchers designing and implementing similar data collection protocols.

KW - Africa

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Ethiopia

KW - Implementation research

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Trauma registry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060920088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060920088&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.afjem.2019.01.009

DO - 10.1016/j.afjem.2019.01.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 30976497

AN - SCOPUS:85060920088

VL - 9

SP - S28-S31

JO - African Journal of Emergency Medicine

JF - African Journal of Emergency Medicine

SN - 2211-419X

ER -