Mitigating the heroin crisis in Baltimore, MD, USA: A cost-benefit analysis of a hypothetical supervised injection facility

Amos Irwin, Ehsan Jozaghi, Brian Weir, Sean Travis Allen, Andrew Lindsay, Susan Sherman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: In Baltimore, MD, as in many cities throughout the USA, overdose rates are on the rise due to both the increase of prescription opioid abuse and that of fentanyl and other synthetic opioids in the drug market. Supervised injection facilities (SIFs) are a widely implemented public health intervention throughout the world, with 97 existing in 11 countries worldwide. Research has documented the public health, social, and economic benefits of SIFs, yet none exist in the USA. The purpose of this study is to model the health and financial costs and benefits of a hypothetical SIF in Baltimore. Methods: We estimate the benefits by utilizing local health data and data on the impact of existing SIFs in models for six outcomes: prevented human immunodeficiency virus transmission, Hepatitis C virus transmission, skin and soft-tissue infection, overdose mortality, and overdose-related medical care and increased medication-assisted treatment for opioid dependence. Results: We predict that for an annual cost of $1.8 million, a single SIF would generate $7.8 million in savings, preventing 3.7 HIV infections, 21 Hepatitis C infections, 374 days in the hospital for skin and soft-tissue infection, 5.9 overdose deaths, 108 overdose-related ambulance calls, 78 emergency room visits, and 27 hospitalizations, while bringing 121 additional people into treatment. Conclusions: We conclude that a SIF would be both extremely cost-effective and a significant public health and economic benefit to Baltimore City.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Article number29
JournalHarm Reduction Journal
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 12 2017

Fingerprint

Baltimore
Heroin
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Injections
Opioid Analgesics
Soft Tissue Infections
Public Health
Insurance Benefits
Economics
Costs and Cost Analysis
Skin
Ambulances
Fentanyl
Hepatitis C
Hepacivirus
Health Care Costs
HIV Infections
Prescriptions
Hospital Emergency Service
Hospitalization

Keywords

  • Baltimore, Maryland
  • Cost-benefit
  • Cost-effectiveness
  • Harm reduction
  • Heroin
  • Opiate overdose
  • People who inject drugs
  • Supervised consumption rooms
  • Supervised injection facility

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Mitigating the heroin crisis in Baltimore, MD, USA : A cost-benefit analysis of a hypothetical supervised injection facility. / Irwin, Amos; Jozaghi, Ehsan; Weir, Brian; Allen, Sean Travis; Lindsay, Andrew; Sherman, Susan.

In: Harm Reduction Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 29, 12.05.2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7a5aa20caaa7400ca8da22f7aaf86127,
title = "Mitigating the heroin crisis in Baltimore, MD, USA: A cost-benefit analysis of a hypothetical supervised injection facility",
abstract = "Background: In Baltimore, MD, as in many cities throughout the USA, overdose rates are on the rise due to both the increase of prescription opioid abuse and that of fentanyl and other synthetic opioids in the drug market. Supervised injection facilities (SIFs) are a widely implemented public health intervention throughout the world, with 97 existing in 11 countries worldwide. Research has documented the public health, social, and economic benefits of SIFs, yet none exist in the USA. The purpose of this study is to model the health and financial costs and benefits of a hypothetical SIF in Baltimore. Methods: We estimate the benefits by utilizing local health data and data on the impact of existing SIFs in models for six outcomes: prevented human immunodeficiency virus transmission, Hepatitis C virus transmission, skin and soft-tissue infection, overdose mortality, and overdose-related medical care and increased medication-assisted treatment for opioid dependence. Results: We predict that for an annual cost of $1.8 million, a single SIF would generate $7.8 million in savings, preventing 3.7 HIV infections, 21 Hepatitis C infections, 374 days in the hospital for skin and soft-tissue infection, 5.9 overdose deaths, 108 overdose-related ambulance calls, 78 emergency room visits, and 27 hospitalizations, while bringing 121 additional people into treatment. Conclusions: We conclude that a SIF would be both extremely cost-effective and a significant public health and economic benefit to Baltimore City.",
keywords = "Baltimore, Maryland, Cost-benefit, Cost-effectiveness, Harm reduction, Heroin, Opiate overdose, People who inject drugs, Supervised consumption rooms, Supervised injection facility",
author = "Amos Irwin and Ehsan Jozaghi and Brian Weir and Allen, {Sean Travis} and Andrew Lindsay and Susan Sherman",
year = "2017",
month = "5",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1186/s12954-017-0153-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
journal = "Harm Reduction Journal",
issn = "1477-7517",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mitigating the heroin crisis in Baltimore, MD, USA

T2 - Harm Reduction Journal

AU - Irwin, Amos

AU - Jozaghi, Ehsan

AU - Weir, Brian

AU - Allen, Sean Travis

AU - Lindsay, Andrew

AU - Sherman, Susan

PY - 2017/5/12

Y1 - 2017/5/12

N2 - Background: In Baltimore, MD, as in many cities throughout the USA, overdose rates are on the rise due to both the increase of prescription opioid abuse and that of fentanyl and other synthetic opioids in the drug market. Supervised injection facilities (SIFs) are a widely implemented public health intervention throughout the world, with 97 existing in 11 countries worldwide. Research has documented the public health, social, and economic benefits of SIFs, yet none exist in the USA. The purpose of this study is to model the health and financial costs and benefits of a hypothetical SIF in Baltimore. Methods: We estimate the benefits by utilizing local health data and data on the impact of existing SIFs in models for six outcomes: prevented human immunodeficiency virus transmission, Hepatitis C virus transmission, skin and soft-tissue infection, overdose mortality, and overdose-related medical care and increased medication-assisted treatment for opioid dependence. Results: We predict that for an annual cost of $1.8 million, a single SIF would generate $7.8 million in savings, preventing 3.7 HIV infections, 21 Hepatitis C infections, 374 days in the hospital for skin and soft-tissue infection, 5.9 overdose deaths, 108 overdose-related ambulance calls, 78 emergency room visits, and 27 hospitalizations, while bringing 121 additional people into treatment. Conclusions: We conclude that a SIF would be both extremely cost-effective and a significant public health and economic benefit to Baltimore City.

AB - Background: In Baltimore, MD, as in many cities throughout the USA, overdose rates are on the rise due to both the increase of prescription opioid abuse and that of fentanyl and other synthetic opioids in the drug market. Supervised injection facilities (SIFs) are a widely implemented public health intervention throughout the world, with 97 existing in 11 countries worldwide. Research has documented the public health, social, and economic benefits of SIFs, yet none exist in the USA. The purpose of this study is to model the health and financial costs and benefits of a hypothetical SIF in Baltimore. Methods: We estimate the benefits by utilizing local health data and data on the impact of existing SIFs in models for six outcomes: prevented human immunodeficiency virus transmission, Hepatitis C virus transmission, skin and soft-tissue infection, overdose mortality, and overdose-related medical care and increased medication-assisted treatment for opioid dependence. Results: We predict that for an annual cost of $1.8 million, a single SIF would generate $7.8 million in savings, preventing 3.7 HIV infections, 21 Hepatitis C infections, 374 days in the hospital for skin and soft-tissue infection, 5.9 overdose deaths, 108 overdose-related ambulance calls, 78 emergency room visits, and 27 hospitalizations, while bringing 121 additional people into treatment. Conclusions: We conclude that a SIF would be both extremely cost-effective and a significant public health and economic benefit to Baltimore City.

KW - Baltimore, Maryland

KW - Cost-benefit

KW - Cost-effectiveness

KW - Harm reduction

KW - Heroin

KW - Opiate overdose

KW - People who inject drugs

KW - Supervised consumption rooms

KW - Supervised injection facility

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019917386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019917386&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12954-017-0153-2

DO - 10.1186/s12954-017-0153-2

M3 - Article

VL - 14

JO - Harm Reduction Journal

JF - Harm Reduction Journal

SN - 1477-7517

IS - 1

M1 - 29

ER -