Missing consent forms in the preoperative area

A single-center assessment of the scope of the problem and its downstream effects

Jacqueline Garonzik, Gabriel Brat, Jose H. Salazar, Andrew Dhanasopon, Anthony Lin, Adesola Akinkuotu, Andres O'Daly, Benjamin Elder, Kelly Olino, William Burns, Melissa Camp, Pamela A Lipsett, Julie A. Freischlag, Elliott Haut

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Missing consent forms at surgery can lead to delays in patient care, provider frustration, and patient anxiety. We sought to assess the scope and magnitude of this problem at our institution. We surveyed key informants to determine the frequency and effect of missing consent forms. We found that 66% of patients were missing signed consent forms at surgery and that this caused a delay for 14% of operative cases. In many instances, the missing consent forms interfered with team rounds and resident educational activities. In addition, residents spent less time obtaining consent and were often uncomfortable obtaining consent for major procedures. Finally, 40% of faculty felt dissatisfied with resident consent forms, and more than two-thirds felt patients were uncomfortable with being asked for consent by residents. At our center, missing consent forms led to delayed cases, burdensome and inadequate consent by residents, and extra work for nursing staff.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)886-889
Number of pages4
JournalJAMA Surgery
Volume148
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Consent Forms
Frustration
Nursing Staff
Patient Care
Anxiety
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Missing consent forms in the preoperative area : A single-center assessment of the scope of the problem and its downstream effects. / Garonzik, Jacqueline; Brat, Gabriel; Salazar, Jose H.; Dhanasopon, Andrew; Lin, Anthony; Akinkuotu, Adesola; O'Daly, Andres; Elder, Benjamin; Olino, Kelly; Burns, William; Camp, Melissa; Lipsett, Pamela A; Freischlag, Julie A.; Haut, Elliott.

In: JAMA Surgery, Vol. 148, No. 9, 09.2013, p. 886-889.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Garonzik, J, Brat, G, Salazar, JH, Dhanasopon, A, Lin, A, Akinkuotu, A, O'Daly, A, Elder, B, Olino, K, Burns, W, Camp, M, Lipsett, PA, Freischlag, JA & Haut, E 2013, 'Missing consent forms in the preoperative area: A single-center assessment of the scope of the problem and its downstream effects', JAMA Surgery, vol. 148, no. 9, pp. 886-889. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.354
Garonzik, Jacqueline ; Brat, Gabriel ; Salazar, Jose H. ; Dhanasopon, Andrew ; Lin, Anthony ; Akinkuotu, Adesola ; O'Daly, Andres ; Elder, Benjamin ; Olino, Kelly ; Burns, William ; Camp, Melissa ; Lipsett, Pamela A ; Freischlag, Julie A. ; Haut, Elliott. / Missing consent forms in the preoperative area : A single-center assessment of the scope of the problem and its downstream effects. In: JAMA Surgery. 2013 ; Vol. 148, No. 9. pp. 886-889.
@article{e456df76202b4247aa78b3149c58d988,
title = "Missing consent forms in the preoperative area: A single-center assessment of the scope of the problem and its downstream effects",
abstract = "Missing consent forms at surgery can lead to delays in patient care, provider frustration, and patient anxiety. We sought to assess the scope and magnitude of this problem at our institution. We surveyed key informants to determine the frequency and effect of missing consent forms. We found that 66{\%} of patients were missing signed consent forms at surgery and that this caused a delay for 14{\%} of operative cases. In many instances, the missing consent forms interfered with team rounds and resident educational activities. In addition, residents spent less time obtaining consent and were often uncomfortable obtaining consent for major procedures. Finally, 40{\%} of faculty felt dissatisfied with resident consent forms, and more than two-thirds felt patients were uncomfortable with being asked for consent by residents. At our center, missing consent forms led to delayed cases, burdensome and inadequate consent by residents, and extra work for nursing staff.",
author = "Jacqueline Garonzik and Gabriel Brat and Salazar, {Jose H.} and Andrew Dhanasopon and Anthony Lin and Adesola Akinkuotu and Andres O'Daly and Benjamin Elder and Kelly Olino and William Burns and Melissa Camp and Lipsett, {Pamela A} and Freischlag, {Julie A.} and Elliott Haut",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1001/jamasurg.2013.354",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "148",
pages = "886--889",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Missing consent forms in the preoperative area

T2 - A single-center assessment of the scope of the problem and its downstream effects

AU - Garonzik, Jacqueline

AU - Brat, Gabriel

AU - Salazar, Jose H.

AU - Dhanasopon, Andrew

AU - Lin, Anthony

AU - Akinkuotu, Adesola

AU - O'Daly, Andres

AU - Elder, Benjamin

AU - Olino, Kelly

AU - Burns, William

AU - Camp, Melissa

AU - Lipsett, Pamela A

AU - Freischlag, Julie A.

AU - Haut, Elliott

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Missing consent forms at surgery can lead to delays in patient care, provider frustration, and patient anxiety. We sought to assess the scope and magnitude of this problem at our institution. We surveyed key informants to determine the frequency and effect of missing consent forms. We found that 66% of patients were missing signed consent forms at surgery and that this caused a delay for 14% of operative cases. In many instances, the missing consent forms interfered with team rounds and resident educational activities. In addition, residents spent less time obtaining consent and were often uncomfortable obtaining consent for major procedures. Finally, 40% of faculty felt dissatisfied with resident consent forms, and more than two-thirds felt patients were uncomfortable with being asked for consent by residents. At our center, missing consent forms led to delayed cases, burdensome and inadequate consent by residents, and extra work for nursing staff.

AB - Missing consent forms at surgery can lead to delays in patient care, provider frustration, and patient anxiety. We sought to assess the scope and magnitude of this problem at our institution. We surveyed key informants to determine the frequency and effect of missing consent forms. We found that 66% of patients were missing signed consent forms at surgery and that this caused a delay for 14% of operative cases. In many instances, the missing consent forms interfered with team rounds and resident educational activities. In addition, residents spent less time obtaining consent and were often uncomfortable obtaining consent for major procedures. Finally, 40% of faculty felt dissatisfied with resident consent forms, and more than two-thirds felt patients were uncomfortable with being asked for consent by residents. At our center, missing consent forms led to delayed cases, burdensome and inadequate consent by residents, and extra work for nursing staff.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884637098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884637098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.354

DO - 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.354

M3 - Article

VL - 148

SP - 886

EP - 889

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 9

ER -